Bail reform as an example of a community psychology intervention in the criminal justice system
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ares, C., Rankin, A., & Sturz, H. The Manhattan Bail Project: An interim report on the use of pre-trial parole.New York University Law Review, 1963,38, 67–95.
Bard, M. Family intervention police teams as a community mental health resource.Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 1969,60, 247–250.
Cook P. (Ed.),Community psychology and community mental health. San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1970.
Foote, C. The coming constitutional crisis in bail.University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1965,113, 959–999.
Foote, C., Markel, J., & Wooley, E. Compelling appearance in court: Administration of bail in Philadelphia.University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1954,102, 1031–1079.
Freed, D., & Wald, P.Bail in the United States: 1964. U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1964.
Goldfarb, R.Ransom: A critique of the American bail system. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.
Kennedy, P. VISTA volunteers bring about successful bail reform in Baltimore.American Bar Association Journal, 1968,54, 1093–1096.
McCarthy, D. Practical results of bail reform.Federal Probation, 1965,29, 10–14.
Morse, W., & Beattie, R. Survey of the administration of criminal justice in Oregon.Oregon Law Review, 1932,11, Supplement.
Nietzel, M. T., & Moss, C. The psychologist in the criminal justice system.Professional Psychology, 1972,3(3), 259–270.
Rankin, A. The effects of pre-trial detention.New York University Law Review, 1964,39, 642–646.
Scott, R. Bail factfinding project at San Francisco.Federal Probation, 1966,30, 39–43.
Smith, R. A new approach to the bail practice.Federal Probation, 1965,29, 3–6.
Wald, P. Pre-trial detention and ultimate freedom: A statistical study.New York University Law Review, 1964,39, 631–655.
Wice, R., & Simon, R. Pre-trial release, a survey of alternative practices.Federal Probation, 1970,34, 60–63.