BUILDING THE AGENDA FOR INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH IN WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT1

Journal of the American Water Resources Association - Tập 40 Số 4 - Trang 925-936 - 2004
William Blomquist1, Tanya Heikkila2, Edella Schlager3
1Indiana University-Purdue
2Columbia University
3Government and Public Policy, School of

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACT: This paper pursues more specifically the recommendations of a recent National Research Council report recommending greater attention to research on institutions in the field of water resource management. The important challenge for the future in institutional research lies in going beyond the observation that institutions are important and in explaining instead how institutions actually affect management options and outcomes. It is possible to illuminate the relationships between institutional features and water management through comparative institutional research. This paper offers recommendations for studying water institutions in a comparative context, including methodological recommendations concerning approaches to comparative institutional research, and topics for comparative institutional research that appear especially fruitful at this time. The example of conjunctive management is used to illustrate the importance of institutional factors in water management, drawing to some extent on the authors’ recent experience with a comparative study of conjunctive management institutions.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Agrawal Arun, 2002, The Drama of the Commons, 41

Allen Peter. T., 1998, Public Participation in Resolving Environmental Disputes and the Problem of Representativeness, Risk, Health, Safety and Environment, 9, 297

10.2307/1058217

Anderson Terry, 1997, Water Markets: Priming the Invisible Pump

10.1111/0002-9092.00098

Blomquist William, 1992, Dividing the Waters: Governing Ground‐water in Southern California

Blomquist William, 2001, Institutions and Conjunctive Water Management Among Three Western States, Natural Resources Journal, 41, 653

Blomquist William, 2004, Common Waters, Diverging Streams: Linking Institutions and Water Management in Arizona, California, and Colorado

10.1080/089419299279326

10.1080/08941920050114628

Conkling Harold, 1946, Utilization of Ground‐Water Storage in Stream System Development, Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers, 111, 275, 10.1061/TACEAT.0005914

10.2307/2082975

DeLeon Peter, 1997, Theories of the Policy Process, 19

Demsetz Harold, 1967, Toward a Theory of Property Rights, American Economic Review, 62, 347

10.1111/j.1752-1688.1995.tb03359.x

El‐Ashry Mohamed T., 1986, Troubled Waters: New Policies for Managing Water in the American West

Grigg Neil S., 1996, Water Resources Management: Principles, Regulations, and Cases

Haddad Brent M., 2000, Rivers of Gold: Designing Markets to Allocate Water in California

Heikkila Tanya 2001.Managing Common‐Pool Resources in a Public Service Industry: The Case of Conjunctive Water Management. Ph.D. Dissertation School of Public Administration and Policy University of Arizona Tucson Arizona.

Howe Charles W., 1997, Water Marketing — The Next Generation, 79

10.1029/WR020i003p00323

Karkkainen Bradley.2002.Collaborative Ecosystem Governance: Scale Complexity and Dynamism. Virginia Environmental Law Journal 189.

Kenney Douglas S., 2000, Arguing About Consensus: Examining the Case Against Western Watershed Initiatives and Other Collaborative Groups Active in Natural Resources Management

Kenney Douglas S., 1999, Research Report RR‐21

Kenney Douglas S. SeanT. McAllister WilliamH. Caile andJasonS. Peckham.2000.The New Watershed Source Book: A Directory and Review of Watershed Initiatives in the Western United States. Natural Resources Law Center University of Colorado School of Law Boulder Colorado.Available athttp://www.colorado.edu/law/centers/nrlc/publications/purchase/research.htm.Accessed inMay 2004.

Kiser Larry L., 1982, Strategies of Political Inquiry, 179

Lasswell Harold D., 1971, A Pre‐View of Policy Sciences

10.1080/089419299279867

Livingston Marie L., 1993, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1227

10.1111/j.1752-1688.1984.tb04747.x

10.1080/15715124.2003.9635189

10.2307/3088419

MacDonnell Lawrence J. CharlesW. Howe KathleenA. Miller TeresaA. RiceandSarahF. Bates 1994.Water Banking in the West. Natural Resources Law Center University of Colorado Boulder Colorado.

10.1080/089419299279786

10.1080/08941920309182

NRC (National Research Council), 2001, National Research Council, Water Science and Technology Board

Natural Resources Law Center, 1998, The State Role in Western Watershed Initiatives

10.3998/mpub.9739

Ostrom Elinor, 2002, The Drama of the Commons

Reisner Marc, 1990, Overlapped Oasis: Reform or Revolution for Western Water

Rose Carol, 2002, Drama of the Commons, 233

Saleth R. Maria, 1999, World Bank Technical Paper No. 447

Scharpf Fritz, 1997, Games Real Actors Play

10.1080/089419200750035593

Simpson Hal, 2002, South Platte River Basin Ground Water Rules to be Amended, Streamlines, 2, 1

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:3(151)

Thomas R.O., 1955, General Aspects of Planned Ground‐Water Utilization, American Society of Civil Engineers, 81, 1

Todd David Keith, 1997, Conjunctive Use of Water Resources: Aquifer Storage and Recovery, 139

USACIR (U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations) 1991.Coordinating Water Resources in the Federal System: The Groundwater‐Surface Water Connection.Report No. A‐109 U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Washington D.C.

Vranesh George, 1999, Vranesh's Colorado Water Law

Wernstedt Kris, 1998, Through A Lens Darkly ‐Super Fund Spectacles on Public Participation at Brownfields Sites, Risk: Health, Safety, and Environment, 9, 153

Western States Water Council 1990.Groundwater Recharge Projects in the Western United States: Economic Efficiency Financial Feasibility and Legal/Institutional Issues.Western States Water Council. Anthony G. Willardson Principal Investigator. Report to the Bureau of Reclamation and the Department of the Interior Midvale Utah.

Wilson James, 2002, Drama of the Commons, 327