Augmented reality in medical education?
Tóm tắt
Learning in the medical domain is to a large extent workplace learning and involves mastery of complex skills that require performance up to professional standards in the work environment. Since training in this real-life context is not always possible for reasons of safety, costs, or didactics, alternative ways are needed to achieve clinical excellence. Educational technology and more specifically augmented reality (AR) has the potential to offer a highly realistic situated learning experience supportive of complex medical learning and transfer. AR is a technology that adds virtual content to the physical real world, thereby augmenting the perception of reality. Three examples of dedicated AR learning environments for the medical domain are described. Five types of research questions are identified that may guide empirical research into the effects of these learning environments. Up to now, empirical research mainly appears to focus on the development, usability and initial implementation of AR for learning. Limited review results reflect the motivational value of AR, its potential for training psychomotor skills and the capacity to visualize the invisible, possibly leading to enhanced conceptual understanding of complex causality.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ifenthaler D, Eseryel D. Facilitating complex learning by mobile augmented reality learning environments. In: Huang R, Spector JM, Kinshuk DGS, editors. Reshaping learning, the frontiers of learning technologies in a global context. New York: Springer; 2013.
Van Merriënboer JJG, Kirschner PA. Ten steps to complex learning, a systematic approach to four-component instructional design. New York: Routledge; 2007.
Salomon G, Perkins DN. Rocky roads to transfer: rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educ Psychol. 1989;24:113–42.
Jonassen D. Meaningful learning with technology. Upper Saddle River: Pearson; 2008.
The New Media Consortium. The HORIZON report 2010 edition. 2013. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/hr2010.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2013.
The New Media Consortium. The HORIZON report 2011 edition. 2013. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/hr2011.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2013
Wu H, Lee S, Chang H, Liang J. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Comput Educ. 2013;62:41–9.
Hugues O, Fuchs P, Nannipieri O. New augmented reality taxonomy: technologies and features of augmented environment. In: Furth B, editor. Handbook of augmented reality. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 47–63.
Azuma R. A survey of augmented reality. Presence. 1997;6(4):355–85.
Azuma R, Baillot Y, Behringer R, Feiner S, Julier S, MacIntyre B. Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Comput Graph. 2001;21(6):34–47.
Zhou F, Duh HBL, Billinghurst M. Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: a review of ten years of ISMAR. In: 7th IEEE and ACM international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR 2008); 2008 Sept 15–18; Cambridge, UK; 2008.
Milgram P, Takemura H, Utsumi F, Kishino. Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality–virtuality continuum. In: Proceedings of telemanipulator and telepresence technologies, vol. 2351; 1994. p. 282–292.
Yu D, Jin JS, Luo S, Lai W. A useful visualization technique: a literature review for augmented reality and its application, limitation & future direction. In: Huang ML, Nguyen QV, Zhang K, editors. Visual information communication. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 311–337. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0312-9. http://public.eblib.com/EBLPublic/PublicView.do?ptiID=511751 http://site.ebrary.com/id/10351877 http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=341596.
Wang H, Bao X, Choudhury RR, Nelakuditi S. InSight: recognizing humans without face recognition. HotMobile. 2013;7:2012.
Genc Y, Riedel S, Souvannavong F, Akinlar C, Navab N. Marker-less tracking for AR: a learning-based approach. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR’02); Darmstadt: IEEE Computer Society; 2002. p. 295–304; IEEE Xplore.
Frank JR, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons Canada RCPSC. The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework: better standards, better physicians, better care, vol. vii. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons Canada; 2005. p. 29.
Winkelmann A. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ. 2007;41:15–22.
McLachlan JC, Bligh J, Bradley P, Searle J. Teaching anatomy without cadavers. Med Educ. 2004;38(4):418–24.
Thomas RG, John NW, Delieu JM. Augmented reality for anatomical education. J Vis Commun Med. 2010;33(1):6–15.
Chien C-H, Chen C-H, Jeng T-S. An interactive augmented reality system for learning anatomy structure. In: Proceedings of the international multiconference of engineers and computer scientists, IMECS, vol. I; 2010. p. 1–6.
Blum T, Kleeberger V, Bichlmeier C, Navab N. Mirracle: an augmented reality magic mirror system for anatomy education. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE virtual reality; 2012 March 4–8; Costa Mesa: IEEE Computer Soc; 2012. p. 115–116; IEEE Xplore.
Hamza-Lup F, Santhanam A, Imielinska C, Meeks S, Rolland J. Distributed augmented reality with 3-D lung dynamics—a planning tool concept. IEEE Trans Info Technol Biomed. 2007;11(1):40.
Gallagher AG, Smith CD, Bowers SP, et al. Psychomotor skills assessment in practicing surgeons experienced in performing advanced laparoscopic procedures. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;197(3):479–88 Epub 2003/08/30.
Westebring-van der Putten EP, Goossens RHM. Haptics in minimally invasive surgery—a review. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008;17(1):3–16.
Fadde PJ. Training complex psychomotor performance skills. In: Silber KH, Foshay WR, Watkins R, Leigh D, Moseley JL, Dessinger JC, editors. Handbook of improving performance in the workplace, vol. 1–3. Hoboken: Wiley; 2010. doi:10.1002/9780470592663.ch14.
Abernethy B, Poolton JM, Masters RSW, Patil NG. Implications of an expertise model for surgical skills training. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78(12):1092–5.
Botden SMBI, Jakimowicz JJ. What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc. 2009;23(8):1693–700.
Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A. Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1549–58.
Botden SMBI. Augmented reality simulation for laparoscopic training. Realistic haptic feedback and meaningful assessment. Dissertation, Technical University Delft, the Netherlands; 2009.
Schmitz B, Specht M, Klemke R. An analysis of the educational potential of augmented reality games for learning. In: Proceedings of the 11th world conference on mobile and contextual learning. Helsinki; 2012. pp. 140–147. http://hdl.handle.net/1820/4790. Accessed 31 Oct 2013.