Augmented reality-based surgical navigation of pelvic screw placement: an ex-vivo experimental feasibility study
Tóm tắt
Minimally invasive surgical treatment of pelvic trauma requires a significant level of surgical training and technical expertise. Novel imaging and navigation technologies have always driven surgical technique, and with head-mounted displays being commercially available nowadays, the assessment of such Augmented Reality (AR) devices in a specific surgical setting is appropriate. In this ex-vivo feasibility study, an AR-based surgical navigation system was assessed in a specific clinical scenario with standard pelvic and acetabular screw pathways. The system has the following components: an optical-see-through Head Mounted Display, a specifically designed modular AR software, and surgical tool tracking using pose estimation with synthetic square markers. The success rate for entry point navigation was 93.8%, the overall translational deviation of drill pathways was 3.99 ± 1.77 mm, and the overall rotational deviation of drill pathways was 4.3 ± 1.8°. There was no relevant theoretic screw perforation, as shown by 88.7% Grade 0–1 and 100% Grade 0–2 rating in our pelvic screw perforation score. Regarding screw length, 103 ± 8% of the planned pathway length could be realized successfully. The novel innovative system assessed in this experimental study provided proof-of-concept for the feasibility of percutaneous screw placement in the pelvis and, thus, could easily be adapted to a specific clinical scenario. The system showed comparable performance with other computer-aided solutions while providing specific advantages such as true 3D vision without intraoperative radiation; however, it needs further improvement and must still undergo regulatory body approval. Future endeavors include intraoperative registration and optimized tool tracking.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Routt MC Jr, Simonian PT, Inaba J. Iliosacral screw fixation of the disrupted sacroiliac joint. Tech Orthop. 1994;9(4):300–14.
Ziran N, Collinge CA, Smith W, Matta JM. Trans-sacral screw fixation of posterior pelvic ring injuries: review and expert opinion. Patient Saf Surg. 2022;16(1):1–12.
Giannoudis PV, Tzioupis CC, Pape HC, Roberts CS. Percutaneous fixation of the pelvic ring: an update. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2007;89(2):145–54.
Davis JA, Movassaghi K, Refaat MI, Lindvall EM. Use of the hybrid operating room for pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery. Injury. 2022;53(11):3754–8.
Bishop JA, Routt MC Jr. Osseous fixation pathways in pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery: osteology, radiology, and clinical applications. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(6):1502–9.
Bates P, Starr A, Reinert CM. The percutaneous treatment of pelvic and acetabular fractures. Dallas: Independent Publisher; 2010.
Euler E, Heining S, Riquarts C, Mutschler W. C-arm-based three-dimensional navigation: a preliminary feasibility study. Comput Aided Surg. 2003;8(1):35–41.
Stöckle U, Schaser K, König B. Image guidance in pelvic and acetabular surgery-expectations, success and limitations. Injury. 2007;38(4):450–62.
Ochs BG, Gonser C, Shiozawa T, Badke A, Weise K, Rolauffs B, et al. Computer-assisted periacetabular screw placement: comparison of different fluoroscopy-based navigation procedures with conventional technique. Injury. 2010;41(12):1297–305.
Traub J, Stefan P, Heining SM, Sielhorst T, Riquarts C, Euler E, et al. Hybrid navigation interface for orthopedic and trauma surgery. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006;9(1):373–80.
Bichlmeier C, Wimmer F, Heining SM, Navab N. Contextual anatomic mimesis: Hybrid in-situ visualization method for improving multi-sensory depth perception in medical augmented reality. 2007; 6th IEEE and ACM international symposium on mixed and augmented reality. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2007.4538837.
Rahman R, Wood ME, Qian L, Price CL, Johnson AA, Osgood GM. Head-mounted display use in surgery: a systematic review. Surg Innov. 2020;27(1):88–100.
Birlo M, Edwards PE, Clarkson M, Stoyanov D. Utility of optical see-through head mounted displays in augmented reality-assisted surgery: a systematic review. Med Image Anal. 2022;77:102361.
Navab N, Martin-Gomez A, Seibold M, Sommersperger M, Song T, Winkler A, et al. Medical Augmented Reality: definition, principle components, domain modeling, and design-development-validation process. J Imaging. 2023;9(1):4.
Garrido-Jurado S, Muñoz-Salinas R, Madrid-Cuevas FJ, Marín-Jiménez MJ. Automatic generation and detection of highly reliable fiducial markers under occlusion. Pattern Recogn. 2014;47(6):2280–92.
Chegini S, Edwards E, McGurk M, Clarkson M, Schilling C. Systematic review of techniques used to validate the registration of augmented-reality images using a head-mounted device to navigate surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;61(1):19–27.
Wanner GA, Heining SM, Raykov V, Pape HC. Back to the future - Augmented Reality in orthopedic trauma surgery. Injury. 2023;54(8):110924.
Dennler C, Safa NA, Bauer DE, Wanivenhaus F, Liebmann F, Götschi T, et al. Augmented Reality navigated sacral-alar-iliac screw insertion. Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15(1):161–8.
Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990;15(1):11–4.
Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA, Allardyce TJ, Garfin SR, Dolinskas C, An HS. Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: An anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(8):1200–6.
Jannin P, Fitzpatrick JM, Hawkes DJ, Pennec X, Shahidi R, Vannier MW. Validation of medical image processing in image-guided therapy. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002;21(12):1445–9.
Jannin P, Korb W. Assessment of image-guided interventions. In: Peters T, Cleary K, editors. Image-guided interventions. Boston, MA: Springer; 2008. p. 531–49.
Holoma Operator Manual v1.5.0. Sofia, Bulgaria: ICB-M Ltd.; 2023. p. 1–125.
Martin-Gomez A, Li H, Song T, Yang S, Wang G, Ding H, et al. STTAR: Surgical Tool Tracking using Off-the-Shelf Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Displays. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2023:1–16.
Green A, Feldman G, Moore DS, Ashikyan O, Sims GC, Sanders D, et al. Identifying safe corridors for anterior pelvic percutaneous instrumentation using computed tomography-based anatomical relationships. Injury. 2022;53(10):3390–3.
Gras F, Gottschling H, Schröder M, Marintschev I, Hofmann GO, Burgkart R. Transsacral osseous corridor anatomy is more amenable to screw insertion in males: a biomorphometric analysis of 280 Pelves. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(10):2304–11.
Dupuis L, van Ginkel LA, Verhamme LM, Maal TJJ, Hermans E, Stirler VMA. Entry point variation in the osseous fixation pathway of the anterior column of the pelvis-a three-dimensional analysis. J Pers Med. 2022;12(10):1748.
Carlson DA, Scheid DK, Maar DC, Baele JR, Kaehr DM. Safe placement of S1 and S2 iliosacral screws: the “vestibule” concept. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(4):264–9.
Mendel T, Appelt K, Kuhn P, Suhm N. Der sakroiliakale Knochenkorridor. Ein virtuelles Volumenmodell zur sicheren Implantation transartikulärer Schrauben [Bony sacroiliac corridor. A virtual volume model for the accurate insertion of transarticular screws]. Unfallchirurg. 2008;111(1):19–26 German.
Stöckle U, König B, Hofstetter R, Nolte LP, Haas NP. Bildwandler-gestützte Navigation. Eine experimentelle Studie zu Beckenverschraubungen [Navigation assisted by image conversion. An experimental study on pelvic screw fixation]. Unfallchirurg. 2001;104(3):215–20 German.
Sylos Labini M, Gsaxner C, Pepe A, Wallner J, Egger J, Bevilacqua V. Depth-awareness in a system for mixed-reality aided surgical procedures. In: International conference on intelligent computing. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 716–26.
Bichlmeier C, Ockert B, Heining SM, Ahmadi A, Navab N. Stepping into the operating theater: ARAV-Augmented Reality Aided Vertebroplasty. In: 2008 7th IEEE/ACM international symposium on mixed and Augmented Reality. Cambridge, UK; 2008. p. 165–6.