Thái độ của sinh viên sư phạm công nghệ thông tin đối với lập trình máy tính và cảm nhận về năng lực tự học cũng như ý kiến của họ về lập trình dựa trên khối Chương trình

Afari, E., & Khine, M. S. (2017). Robotics as an educational tool: Impact of lego mindstorms. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(6), 437–442. Akçay, A., (2015). Analyzing self-efficacy of programming skills in terms of problem solving and inquiry skills. (Master thesis). Necmettin Erbakan University, Institute of Educational, Konya. Altun, A., & Kasalak, İ. (2018). Perceived self-efficacy scale development study related to block-based programming: Scratch case. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 8(1), 209–225. Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661–670. Bardakçı, S., Kılıçer, K., & Özeke, V. (2017). A Projection from Computer Education & Instructional Technologies Departments in Turkey. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 7(2), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.286627. Baz, F. (2018). A comparative analysis of coding software for children. Current Research in Education, 4(1), 36–47. Chaudhary, V., Agrawal, V., Sureka, P., & Sureka, A. (2016). An Experience Report on Teaching Programming and Computational Thinking to Elementary Level Children Using Lego Robotics Education Kit. In 2016 IEEE eighth international conference on Technology for Education (T4E). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/t4e.2016.016. Chavkin, N. F., & Williams, D. L. (1988). Critical issues in teacher training for parent involvement. Educational Horizons, 66(2), 87–89. Chen, C., Haduong, P., Brennan, K., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. (2018). The effects of first programming language on college students’ computing attitude and achievement: A comparison of graphical and textual languages. Computer Science Education, 28(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1547564. Diyas, Y., Brakk, D., Aimambetov, Y., & Sandygulova, A. (2016). Evaluating peer versus teacher robot within educational scenario of programming learning. In the Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (pp. 425-426). IEEE press. Erol, O., & Kurt, A. A. (2017a). Investigation of CEIT students’ attitudes towards programming. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Education Faculty Journal, 1(41), 314–325. Erol, O., & Kurt, A. A. (2017b). The effects of teaching programming with scratch on pre-service information technology teachers’ motivation and achievement. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.017. Ersoy, H., Madran, R. O. & Gülbahar, Y. (2016). A method profosed for teaching programming language: Robotic programming. Academic Information Conference 11-XIII. Fidan, U., & Yalçın, Y. (2012). Lego Nxt Training Kit. The Journal of Afyon Kocatepe University Science Institute, 12(2012), 01510 1–8. Gezgin, D. M., & Adnan, M. (2016). The Students' of mechanical engineering and econometrics perceptions of self-efficacy research. Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Education Faculty Journal, 17(2), 509–525. Gülbahar, Y., & Kalelioğlu, F. (2018). Information and communication technologies and computer science: The process of curriculum development. National Education Journal, 47(217), 5–23. Gunbatar, M., & Karalar, H. (2018). Gender differences in middle school students’ attitudes and self-efficacy perceptions towards mBlock programming. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 925–933. Hernández, D., Trejo, H., & Ordoñez, E. (2015). Development of an exploration land robot using low-cost andOpen Sourceplatforms for educational purposes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 582, 12007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/582/1/012007. Hu, H. (2017). A low-cost autonomous robot and educational platform for intelligent automation experiments. DEStech Transactions on Engineering and Technology Research, (ameme). https://doi.org/10.12783/dtetr/ameme2017/16221 Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R., & Beierlein, C. (2007). Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2823–2837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.007. Işık, A., Çiltaş, A., & Baş, F. (2010). Teacher training and teaching profession. Atatürk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 14(1), 53–62. Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Angeli, C. (2017). Effect of robotics on elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, science learning, and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 175–192. Jdeed, M., Zhevzhyk, S., Steinkellner, F., & Elmenreich, W. (2017). Spiderino - A low-cost robot for swarm research and educational purposes. In 2017 13th workshop on intelligent solutions in embedded systems (WISES). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/wises.2017.7986929. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. B. (2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. Kadir, W. M., Samin, R. E., & Ibrahim, B. S. (2012). Internet controlled robotic arm. Process Engineering, 41, 1065–1071. Kallia, M., & Sentance, S. (2018). Are boys more confident than girls? In Proceedings of the 13th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education on - WiPSCE ‘18. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3265757.3265773. Karimi, Z., Baraani-Dastjerdi, A., Ghasem-Aghaee, N., & Wagner, S. (2016). Links between the personalities, styles and performance in computer programming. Journal of Systems and Software, 111, 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.011. Kazakoff, E. R., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2012). The effect of a classroom-based intensive robotics and programming workshop on sequencing ability in early childhood. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0554-5. Korkmaz, Ö., & Altun, H. (2014). A validity and reliability study of the learning computer programming attitude scale (LeCoPAS). Mevlana International Journal of Education, 4(1), 30–43. Korkmaz, Ö., Çakır, R., Özden, M., Oluk, A., & Sarıoğlu, S. (2015). Investigation of individuals’ computational thinking skills in terms of different variables. Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Education Journal, 34(2), 68–87. Kusuma, I. D., Utaminingrum, F., & Kakeshita, T. (2018). A toolkit to learn algorithmic thinking using mBot robot. Information Processing Society of Japan Kyushu Branch Tuesday Country Information Symposium. Lamb, A., & Johnson, L. (2011). Scratch: Computer programming for 21st century learners. Lego Mindstorms NXT. (2018). In Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved 22:40, Nov 20, 2018, Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lego_Mindstorms_NXT. Lim, G. W., & Kim, C. S. (2019). The effect of modular robot programming education on learning motivation of informatics curriculum. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 22(1), 79–86. Luo, R. C., & Su, K. L. (2003). A multi agent multi sensor based real-time sensory control system for intelligent security robot. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2, 2394–2399. Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 189–208). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Naya, M., Varela, G., Llamas, L., Bautista, M., Prieto, A., & Duro, R. J. (2017). Robobo: The next generation of educational robot. In ROBOT 2017: Third Iberian Robotics Conference (Vol. 2, p. 359). Springer. Numanoğlu, M., & Keser, H. (2017). Robot usage in programming teaching - Mbot example. Bartın University Faculty of Education Journal, 6(2), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.306198. Oktay, A. (2013). Teaching profession and Teacher's specifications. Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(3), 187–193. Ouahbi, I., Kaddari, F., Darhmaoui, H., Elachqar, A., & Lahmine, S. (2015). Learning basic programming concepts by creating games with scratch programming environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1479–1482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.224. Özdemirci, E., Ersin, Ç., & Canal, M. (2017). Realization of application set for Arduino Uno. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of the Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, 8(special 1), 127–133. Özdinç, F., & Altun, A. (2014). Factors effecting information technology teacher Trainees' programming process. Primary Education Online, 13(4). Özmen, B., & Altun, A. (2014). Undergraduate Students' experiences in programming: Difficulties and obstacles. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 5(3), 1–27. http://dergipark.gov.tr/tojqi/issue/21404/229409. Özyurt, Ö., & Özyurt, H. (2014). A study for determining computer programming students’ attitudes towards programming and their programming self-efficacy. Theory and Practice in Education, 11(1), 51–67. Rubio, M. A., Romero-Zaliz, R., Mañoso, C., & de Madrid, A. P. (2015). Closing the gender gap in an introductory programming course. Computers & Education, 82, 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.003. Sayın, Z., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2016). Coding education as a new 21st century skill and its effect on educational policies. Academic Informatics Conference, 3-5. Shukla, A., Singh, R., Agarwal, R., Suhail, M., Saha, S. K., & Chaudury, S. (2017). Development of a low-cost education platform. In proceedings of the advances in robotics on - AIR ‘17. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132446.3134902. Silva, M. P., Neves, D., Gonçalves, J., & Costa, P. (2016). Proposal of the microfactory robotic competition, of the factory environment and of its official robot which is also a low cost versatile educational robot. In INTED2016 Proceedings. IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2016.1008. Sırakaya, M. (2018). Student views on coding training. Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Education Journal, 37(2), 79–90. Telegenov, K., Tlegenov, Y., & Shintemirov, A. (2015). A low-cost open-source 3-D-printed three-finger gripper platform for research and educational purposes. IEEE Access, 3, 638–647. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2015.2433937. Toh, E., Poh, L., Causo, A., Tzuo, P. W., Chen, I., & Yeo, S. H. (2016). A review on the use of robots in education and young children. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 136–143. Tsan, J., Boyer, K. E., & Lynch, C. F. (2016). How early does the CS gender gap emerge? In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education - SIGCSE ‘16. ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844605. Witherspoon, E. B., Schunn, C. D., Higashi, R. M., & Shoop, R. (2018). Attending to structural programming features predicts differences in learning and motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12219. Wong, N. K. (2015). Affordable open-source Mobile robot kit for education and research. Davis: University of California. Yağcı, M. (2016). Effect of attitudes of information technologies (IT) preservice teachers and computer programming (CP) students toward programming on their perception regarding their self-sufficiency for programming. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v13i1.3502. Yılmaz, N., Sağıroğlu, Ş., & Bayrak, M. (2013). General aimed web based Mobile robot: Sunar. Gazi University Journal of Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, 21(4). Yu, B. G., Lee, W. G., & Kim, J. (2015). The utilization time of effective programming in the programming education utilizing the robot. International Journal of Imaging and Robotics, 15(3), 106–115. Yukselturk, E., & Altiok, S. (2016). An investigation of the effects of programming with scratch on the preservice IT teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions and attitudes towards computer programming. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12453. Yünkül, E., Durak, G., Çankaya, S., & Mısırlı, Z. (2017). The effects of scratch software on students’ computational thinking skills. Necatibey Faculty of Education Journal of Electronic Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 502–517. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.373424.