Attitude of physiotherapists toward electronic health record in Croatia

Archives of Physiotherapy - Tập 9 - Trang 1-7 - 2019
Manuela Filipec1, Gordana Brumini2
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Clinical Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia
2Department of Medical Informatics, Rijeka University School of Medicine, Rijeka, Croatia

Tóm tắt

Electronic health record can facilitate everyday clinical practice of physiotherapists. The aim of this study is to determine attitude of physiotherapists towards implementation of information technology in their work and the differences in attitude in relation to gender, age, level of education and type of health institutions. This study is a cross-sectional survey of Croatian physiotherapists. The questionnaire ″Attitude of physiotherapists towards implementation of electronic health record included 12 items scored on a Likert-type scale from 1 to 5 and presented the award values as “Disagree”, “Neither agree nor disagree” and “Agree”. Croatian physiotherapists were (n = 267) recruited from 13 health care institutions. For analysis chi square test, t-test, one-way analysis of variance and as a post-hoc Tukey test were used. Explanatory factorial analysis confirmed two factors: Satisfaction in the work of physiotherapists using computers (SAT) and Necessity of computers in the work of physiotherapists (NEC). Most physiotherapists agree on (SAT) (47.9%) and on (NEC) (51.3%). Male physiotherapists were significantly more likely to disagree with statements related to SAT (p < 0.001) and NEC (p = 0.035) than female physiotherapists. Physiotherapists aged between 46 and 55 years were significantly more like to disagree on NEC in comparison to all the other groups of participants (p < 0.001). Physiotherapists with secondary school degree were significantly more like to disagree on NEC as compared with participants with bachelor’s degree (p = 0.009), as well as in comparison with physiotherapists with a university degree (p = 0.002). Most of the physiotherapists who are employed in Clinical hospitals and in the Speciality hospital agree with that statement (all p > 0.05). The attitude of Croatian physiotherapists towards electronic health record differs according to the age, gender, level of education and type of health care institutions. This finding can facilitate implementation of electronic health record in physiotherapy. Not applicable.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Buyl R, Nyssen M. Structured electronic physiotherapy records. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78:473–81. Vreeman DJ, Taggard SL, Rhine MD, Worrell TW. Evidence for electronic health record Systems in Physical Therapy. Phys Ther. 2006;86:434–46. Partia R. The content and structure of electronic health records in physiotherapy. Physiotherapy. 2015;101:eS833–eS1237. Ajami S, Ketabi S, Isfahani SS, Heidari A. Readiness assessment of electronic health records implementation. Acta Inform Med. 2011;19:224–7. Deutscher D, Hart DL, Dickstein R, Horn SD, Gutvirtz M. Implementing an integrated electronic outcomes and electronic health record process to create a Foundation for Clinical Practice Improvement. Phys Ther. 2008;88:270–85. Kuusisto A, Asikainen P, Iltanen S, Saranto K. The effects of electronic health record on the flow of information – a pilot study. Med Inf. 2013;92:1060–6. Middleton B, Bloomrosen M, Dente MA, Hashmat B, Koppel R, Overhage JM, et al. Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIAJ. Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20:e2–8. de Lusignan S, Mold F, Sheikh A, Majeed A, Wyatt JC, Quinn T, et al. Patients’ online access to their electronic health records and linked online services: a systematic interpretative review. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e006021. Hincapie A, Warholak T. The impact of health information exchange on health outcomes. Appl Clin Inf. 2011;2:499–507. Sarkar IN. Evaluation of biomedical informatics innovations and their impact on public health. Methods Inf Med. 2012;51:93–4. Cooke CE, Isetts BJ, Sullivan TE, Fustgaard M, Belletti MA. Potential value of electronic prescribing in health economic and outcomes research. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2010;1:163–78. Lubick Goldzweig C, Towfigh A, Maglione M, Shekelle PG. Costs and benefits of health information technology: new trends from the literature. Health Aff. 2009;28:w282–93. Ajami S. Barriers to implement electronic health records (EHRs). Mater Sociomed. 2013;25:213–5. Kruse CS, Mileski M, Alaytsev V, Carol E, Williams A. Adoption factors assosciated with electronic health record among long-term facilities:a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;25:e006615. Brumini G. The attitude of health professionals towards the process of computerization of hospitals: Dissertation. Rijeka: University School of Medicine Rijeka; 2007. Hwang JI, Park HA. Factors associated with nurses’ informatics competency. Com Inf Nur. 2011;29:256–62. Lakbala P, Dindarloo K. Physicians’ perception and attitude toward electronic medical record. Springerplus. 2014;3:63. Kuang-Ming K, Chung-Feng L, Ma CC. An investigation of the effect of nurses’technology readiness on the acceptance of mobile electronic medical record systems. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13:1–14. Kipturgo MK, Kivuti-Bitok LW, Karani AK, Muiva MM. Attitudes of nursing staff towards computerisation: a case of two hospitals in Nairobi, Kenya. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014;2:14–35. Nour El-Din MM. Physicians’ use of and attitudes toward electronic medical record system implemented at a teaching Hospital in Saudi Arabia. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2007;82:347–64. de Veer AJ, Francke AL. Attitudes of nursing staff towards electronic patient records: a questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;7:846–54. Shoham S, Gonen A. Intentions of hospital nurses to work with computers: based on the theory of planned behavior. CIN. 2008;26:106–16. Kivuti L, Chepchirchir A. Computerization readiness. J Nurs Inform. 2011;15:178–87. Eley R, Fallon T, Soar J, Buikstra E, Hegney D. Barriers to use of information and computer technology by Australia’s nurses: a national survey. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18:1151–8. Baddour AA, Dablool AS. Information technology adopting by doctors. Int J Pure Appl Sci Technol. 2012;11:79–91. Huryk LA. Factors influencing nurses’ attitudes towards healthcare information technology. J Nurs Manag. 2010;18:606–12. Brumini G, Kovic I, Zombori D, Lulic I, Petrovecki M. Nurses’ attitudes towards computers: cross sectional questionnaire study. Croat Med J. 2005;46:101–4. Brumini G, Kovic I, Zombori D, Lulic I, Bilic-Zulle L, Petrovecki M. Comparisons of Physicians' and Nurses' attitudes towards computers. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;116:608–13.