Attention and Performance

Annual Review of Psychology - Tập 52 Số 1 - Trang 629-651 - 2001
Harold Pashler1,2, James C. Johnston3,2, Eric Ruthruff3,2
1Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
2NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, 94035
3Department of Psychology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093

Tóm tắt

▪ Abstract  Recent progress in the study of attention and performance is discussed, focusing on the nature of attentional control and the effects of practice. Generally speaking, the effects of mental set are proving more pervasive than was previously suspected, whereas automaticity is proving less robust. Stimulus attributes (e.g. onsets, transients) thought to have a “wired-in” ability to capture attention automatically have been shown to capture attention only as a consequence of voluntarily adopted task sets. Recent research suggests that practice does not have as dramatic effects as is commonly believed. While it may turn out that some mental operations are automatized in the strongest sense, this may be uncommon. Recent work on task switching is also described; optimal engagement in a task set is proving to be intimately tied to learning operations triggered by the actual performance of a new task, not merely the anticipation of such performance.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Allport A, Styles EA, Hsieh S. 1994.Shifting intentional set: exploring the dynamic control of tasks.InAttention and Performance XV: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing, ed. C Umilta, M Moscovitch, pp. 421–52. Cambridge: MIT Press

10.1037//0096-1523.26.2.594

10.3758/BF03205306

10.1037/h0026899

10.3758/BF03211962

10.3758/BF03198124

10.1080/17470216308416546

10.1163/156856899X00120

10.1016/0001-6918(82)90043-9

10.1037//0096-1523.19.5.965

Dutta A, Walker BN. 1995.Persistence of the PRP effect: evaluating the response-selection bottleneck. Presented at 36th Annu. Meet. Psychonom. Soc., Los Angeles

Fagot C. 1994.Chronometric investigations of task switching. PhD thesis. Univ. Calif., San Diego

10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.847

10.1037//0096-1523.18.4.1015

10.1037//0096-1523.20.2.317

10.1111/1467-9280.00034

10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.699

10.1037/h0032762

10.1037/h0035451

Halliday AM, 1959, Q. J. Exp. Psychol., 11, 72

Hazeltine E, Teague D, Ivry R. 2000.Dual-task performance during simultaneous execution: evidence for concurrent response selection processes. Presented at Annu. Meet. Cogn. Neurosci. Soc., San Francisco

10.1037//0096-3445.109.1.98

10.1037/10538-000

Jersild AT, 1927, Arch. Psychol.

Johnston JC, Delgado DF. 1993.Bypassing the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task performance. Presented at 34th Annu. Meet. Psychonom. Soc., Washington, DC

Jonides J. 1981.Voluntary versus automatic movements of the mind's eye.InAttention and Performance IX, ed. J Long, A Baddeleypp. 197–203. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum

10.3758/BF03208805

10.1080/14640746808400145

10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00530.x

10.1038/7286

Levy J, 2000, J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform.

10.1037//0033-295X.95.4.492

10.3758/BF03206020

10.1037//0096-1523.18.2.471

10.1080/14640747708400639

10.1080/14640747808400656

10.1037//0278-7393.22.6.1423

10.3758/BF03208064

10.1037//0096-1523.15.2.315

Neisser U, 1976, Cognition and reality: principles and implications of cognitive psychology.

Newell A. 1973.You can't play twenty questions with nature and win: projective comments on the papers of this symposium.InVisual Information Processing, ed. WG Chase, pp. 283–308. New York: Academic

10.1037//0278-7393.23.2.324

10.3758/BF03210840

Parasuraman R, 1998, The Attentive Brain.

10.3758/BF03208800

10.1037//0096-1523.16.4.843

10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220

Pashler H, 1998, The Psychology of Attention.

10.1080/14640749308401067

Pashler H, Johnston J. 1998.Attentional limitations in dual-task performance.InAttention, ed. HE Pashler, pp. 155–89. Hove, UK: Psychology Press/Erlbaum

10.1080/00335558008248231

Posner MI, Snyder CRR. 1975. Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. SeeRabbitt & Dornic 1975, pp. 669–81

Rabbitt PMA, 1975, Attention and Performance V.

Remington RW, 2000, Percept. Psychophys.

10.3758/BF03212254

10.1037//0278-7393.25.2.532

10.1037//0096-3445.124.2.207

Rosenbloom P, Newell A. 1987.Learning by chunking: a production system model of practice.InProduction System Models of Learning and Development, ed. D Klahr, P Langley, pp. 221–86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Ruthruff E, 2000, J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform.

Ruthruff E, 2000, Psychonom. Bul. Rev.

Ruthruff E, 2000, J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform.

10.1037//0882-7974.13.3.445

10.1037//0033-295X.84.1.1

Schumacher EH, Seymour T, Glass JM, Lauber EJ, Kieras DE, Meyer DE. 1997.Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance. Presented at 38th Annu. Meet. Psychonom. Soc., Philadelphia

10.2307/1421465

Sternberg S. 1969.The discovery of processing stages: extensions of Donders' method.InAttention and Performance II, ed. WG Koster, pp. 276–315. Amsterdam: North Holland

10.1037//0096-1523.13.1.89

10.3758/BF03211619

10.3758/BF03211656

10.1037/10867-000

Townsend JT. 1974.Issues and models concerning the processing of a finite number of inputs.InHuman Information Processing: Tutorials in Performance and Cognition, ed. BH Kantowitz, pp. 133–68. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

10.1037//0096-1523.25.5.1268

10.1016/0001-6918(67)90040-6

10.1111/1467-8721.ep10769733

10.1037//0096-1523.15.3.419

10.1037//0096-1523.25.3.661

10.1037//0096-1523.20.1.95

10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.601

10.1037//0096-1523.16.1.121