Assessment of the Accuracy of Stereotactic Target Localization Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Phantom Study

Journal of Radiosurgery - Tập 1 - Trang 99-111 - 1998
J. Novotný1, J. Vymazal1, R. Liščák1, V. Vladyka1
1Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery Dept., Hospital Na Homolce, Prague 5, Czech Republic

Tóm tắt

Magnetic resonance imaging is a valuable technique for brain target visualization and localization for stereotactically guided open surgery, stereotactic biopsy, or stereotactic radiosurgery. However, questions remain regarding the extent of image distortion (caused mainly by inhomogeneity of the constant magnetic field induced by the imaged object and nonlinearities in the gradient fields) and its effect on the accuracy of stereotactic localization. A phantom study has been carried out to assess the accuracy of stereotactic localization using spin echo T1-weighted, T2-weighted, proton density, and gradient echo three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. A special cubical perspex phantom with the insert of an array of 81 solid perspex rods (2 mm in diameter and spaced 15 mm) was constructed and attached to the base of a Leksell sterotactic frame. The deviations between sterotactic coordinates based on magnetic resonance imaging determined in the treatment planning system and real geometrical position given by the construction of an array of perspex rods within the phantom were evaluated in a series of axial and coronal images for the above-mentioned four sequences. No dependence of the extent of deviations on the investigation sequences was observed. The image orientation and spatial position of measured points in the volume of cubical phantom were also not significantly influenced. The maximal deviation was observed for T1-weighted coronal study, 1.8 mm in the Z coordinate. However, average deviations in all of the eight performed studies were less than or equal to 0.6 mm. Phantom measurements proved minimal distortion effects for all investigated modalities and therefore no special corrections were applied for stereotactic localization.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bucholz RD, Ho HW, Rubin JP: Variables affecting the accuracy of stereotactic localization using computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 79:667–673, 1993 Guo WY, Chu WC, Wu MC, Gwan WP, Pan DHC, Chung WY, Chang CY: Systematic accuracy evaluation for MR-guided gamma knife radiosurgery. Seventh International Leksell Gamma Knife Society Meeting, Nov. 12–15, 1995, Lana'i, Hawaii Kondziolka D, Dempsey PK, Lunsford LD, Kestle JRW, Dolan EJ, Kanal E, Tasker RR: A comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for stereotactic coordinate determination. Neurosurgery 30:402–406, 1992 Meuli RA, Verdun FR, Bochud FO, Emsley L, Fankhauser H: Assessment of MR image deformation for stereotactic neurosurgery using a tagging sequence. Am J Neuroradiol 15:45–49, 1994 Phillips MH, Kessler M, Chuang FYS, Frankel K, Lyman JT, Fabrikant JI, Levy RP: Image correlation of MRI and CT in treatment planning for radiosurgery of intracranial vascular malformations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 20:881–889 Piovan E, Zampiery PG, Alessandriny F, Gerosa MA, Nicolato A, Pasoli A, Foroni R, Giri MG, Bricolo A, Benati A: Quality assessment of magnetic resonance stereotactic localization for gamma knife radiosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 64(suppl 1):228–232, 1995 Posewitz A, Jones D, Young RF: Evaluating MRI inaccuracies. Seventh International Leksell Gamma Knife Society Meeting, Nov. 12–15, 1995, Lana'i, Hawaii Prott FJ, Haverkamp U, Willich N, Resch A, Stober U, Potter R: Comparison of imaging accuracy at different MRI units based on phantom measurements. Radiother and Oncol 37:221–224, 1995 Schad LR, Boesecke R, Schlegel W, Hartmann GH, Sturm V, Strauss LG, Lorenz WJ: Three dimensional image correlation of CT, MR, and PET studies in radiotherapy treatment planning of brain tumors. J Computer Assisted Tomogr 11:948–954, 1987 Schad LR, Lott S, Schmitt F, Sturm V, Lorenz WJ: Correction of spatial distortion in MR imaging: A prerequisite for accurate stereotaxy. J Computer Assisted Tomogr 11:499–505, 1987 Schad LR, Ehricke HH, Wowra B, Layer G, Engenhart R, Kauczor HU, Zabel HJ, Brix G, Lorenz WJ: Correction of spatial distortion in magnetic resonance angiography for radiosurgical treatment planning of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Magn Reson Imag 10:609–621, 1992 Sumanaweera TS, Adler JR Jr, Napel S, Glover GH: Characterization of spatial distortion in magnetic resonance imaging and its implication for stereotactic surgery. Neurosurgery 35:696–702, 1994 Sumanaweera TS, Glover G, Song S, Adler JR, Napel S: Quantifying MRI geometric distortion in tissue. Magn Reson Med 31: 40–47, 1994 Vernon S, Verhey L, Petti P: Accuracy of stereotactic localization using magnetic resonance imaging—A second investigation. Seventh International Leksell Gamma Knife Society Meeting, Nov. 12–15, 1995, Lana'i, Hawaii Walton L, Hampshire A, Forster DMC, Kemeny AA: Stereotactic localization using magnetic resonance imaging. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 64(suppl 1):155–163, 1995 Walton L, Hampshire A, Forster DMC, Kemeny AA: Accuracy of stereotactic localisation using MRI. A comparison of 2D and 3D data acquisition. Seventh International Leksell Gamma Knife Society Meeting, Nov. 12–15, 1995, Lana'i, Hawaii Walton L, Hampshire A, Forster DMC, Kemeny AA: A phantom study to assess the accuracy of stereotactic localization, using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with the Leksell stereotactic system. Neurosurgery 38:170–178, 1996 Goldberg HI, Lavi E, Atlas SW: Extra-axial brain tumors. In Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain and Spine. SW Atlas (ed). Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996, pp 423–487 Horowitz AL: MRI Physics for Radiologists: A Visual Approach. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1995