Assessment of Student Learning Associated with Tree Thinking in an Undergraduate Introductory Organismal Biology Course

CBE Life Sciences Education - Tập 12 Số 3 - Trang 542-552 - 2013
James J. Smith1,2, Kendra Spence Cheruvelil1,3, Stacie Auvenshine3
1*Lyman Briggs College, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48825-1107
2Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
3Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824

Tóm tắt

Phylogenetic trees provide visual representations of ancestor–descendant relationships, a core concept of evolutionary theory. We introduced “tree thinking” into our introductory organismal biology course (freshman/sophomore majors) to help teach organismal diversity within an evolutionary framework. Our instructional strategy consisted of designing and implementing a set of experiences to help students learn to read, interpret, and manipulate phylogenetic trees, with a particular emphasis on using data to evaluate alternative phylogenetic hypotheses (trees). To assess the outcomes of these learning experiences, we designed and implemented a Phylogeny Assessment Tool (PhAT), an open-ended response instrument that asked students to: 1) map characters on phylogenetic trees; 2) apply an objective criterion to decide which of two trees (alternative hypotheses) is “better”; and 3) demonstrate understanding of phylogenetic trees as depictions of ancestor–descendant relationships. A pre–post test design was used with the PhAT to collect data from students in two consecutive Fall semesters. Students in both semesters made significant gains in their abilities to map characters onto phylogenetic trees and to choose between two alternative hypotheses of relationship (trees) by applying the principle of parsimony (Occam's razor). However, learning gains were much lower in the area of student interpretation of phylogenetic trees as representations of ancestor–descendant relationships.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson DL, 2002, J Res Sci Teach, 39, 952, 10.1002/tea.10053

Baum DA, 2005, Science, 310, 979, 10.1126/science.1117727

Bloome D, 1989, Curric Inq, 19, 265, 10.1080/03626784.1989.11075331

Brewer S, 1996, Bioscene, 22, 11

Campbell NA, 2008, Biology, 8th ed.

Catley KM, 2010, J Res Sci Teach, 47, 861, 10.1002/tea.20384

College Board, 2011, AP Biology Curriculum Framework 2012–2013

Darwin C, 1859, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection

Flammer L (2007). Whale Ankles and DNA: Whale Connections … Discovered In: www.indiana.edu/∼ensiweb/lessons/wh.a%26d.les.html (accessed 1 July 2011).

Giese AR, 2005, Am Biol Teach, 67, 412, 10.1662/0002-7685(2005)067[0412:UIPTTC]2.0.CO;2

Gregory TR, 2008, Evol Educ Outreach, 1, 121, 10.1007/s12052-008-0035-x

Halverson KL, 2011, Evol Educ Outreach, 4, 95, 10.1007/s12052-010-0307-0

Handelsman J, 2007, Scientific Teaching

Johnson DW, 1998, Advanced Cooperative Learning, 3

Julius ML, 2006, J Coll Sci Teach, 35, 40

Li C, 2008, Nature, 456, 497, 10.1038/nature07533

Maier CA, 2001, Am Biol Teach, 63, 642, 10.2307/4451210

Meir E, 2007, Am Biol Teach, 69, 71, 10.1662/0002-7685(2007)69[71:CSMAET]2.0.CO;2

Meisel RP, 2011, Evol Educ Outreach, 3, 621, 10.1007/s12052-010-0254-9

Meltzer DE, 2002, Am J Phys, 70, 1259, 10.1119/1.1514215

Novick LR, 2010, Evol Educ Outreach, 3, 539, 10.1007/s12052-010-0243-z

Padian K, 2008, Integr Comp Biol, 48, 175, 10.1093/icb/icn023

10.1187/cbe.07-01-0007

Singer F, 2001, Am Biol Teach, 63, 518, 10.1662/0002-7685(2001)063[0518:TCMHTP]2.0.CO;2

Smith JJ, 2009, Evol Educ Outreach, 2, 429, 10.1007/s12052-009-0156-x

Weber E, 2009, Bull Ecol Soc Am, 90, 501, 10.1890/0012-9623-90.4.501