Assessing placement bias of the global river gauge network

Nature Sustainability - Tập 5 Số 7 - Trang 586-592
Corey A. Krabbenhoft1, George H. Allen2, Peirong Lin3, Sarah E. Godsey4, Daniel C. Allen5, Ryan M. Burrows6, Amanda Delvecchia7, Ken M. Fritz8, Margaret Shanafield9, Amy J. Burgin10, Margaret Zimmer11, Thibault Datry12, Walter K. Dodds13, C. Nathan Jones14, Meryl C. Mims15, Catherin Franklin2, John C. Hammond16, Samuel C. Zipper17, Adam Ward18, Katie H. Costigan14, Hylke E. Beck19, Julian D. Olden20
1Department of Biological Sciences and Research and Education in Energy, Environment and Water (RENEW) Institute, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
2Department of Geography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
3Institute of Remote Sensing and GIS, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
4Department of Geosciences,, Idaho State University, Pocatello,ID, USA
5Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
6School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Burnley, Victoria, Australia
7Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
8Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, USA
9National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training, College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
10Kansas Biological Survey–Center for Ecological Research, Environmental Studies Program, and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
11Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
12INRAE, UR Riverly, Centre Lyon-Grenoble Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Villeurbanne, France
13Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS USA
14Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
15Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
16US Geological Survey MD-DE-DC Water Science Center, Catonsville, MD, USA
17Kansas Geological Survey, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
18O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
19Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, Ispra, Italy
20School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Vörösmarty, C. J. et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467, 555–561 (2010).

Ruhi, A., Messager, M. L. & Olden, J. D. Tracking the pulse of the Earth’s fresh waters. Nat. Sustain. 1, 198–203 (2018).

Pearson, C. Short- and medium-term climate information for water management. World Meteorol. Organ. Bull. 57, 173–177 (2008).

Tetzlaff, D., Carey, S. K., McNamara, J. P., Laudon, H. & Soulsby, C. The essential value of long-term experimental data for hydrology and water management. Water Resour. Res. 53, 2598–2604 (2017).

Carlisle, D. M., Wolock, D. M. & Meador, M. R. Alteration of streamflow magnitudes and potential ecological consequences: a multiregional assessment. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 264–270 (2011).

Shrestha, S., Kazama, F. & Newham, L. T. H. A framework for estimating pollutant export coefficients from long-term in-stream water quality monitoring data. Environ. Model. Softw. 23, 182–194 (2008).

Lepistö, A., Futter, M. N. & Kortelainen, P. Almost 50 years of monitoring shows that climate, not forestry, controls long-term organic carbon fluxes in a large boreal watershed. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 1225–1237 (2014).

Hester, G., Ford, D., Carsell, K., Vertucci, C. & Stallings, E. A. Flood Management Benefits of USGS Streamgaging Program (National Hydrologic Warning Council, 2006).

Xu, H., Xu, C.-Y., Chen, H., Zhang, Z. & Li, L. Assessing the influence of rain gauge density and distribution on hydrological model performance in a humid region of China. J. Hydrol. 505, 1–12 (2013).

Kiang, J. E., Stewart, D. W., Archfield, S. A., Osborne, E. B. & Eng, K. A National Streamflow Network Gap Analysis (USGS, 2013).

Deweber, J. T. et al. Importance of understanding landscape biases in USGS gage locations: implications and solutions for managers. Fisheries 39, 155–163 (2014).

Tickner, D. et al. Bending the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss: an emergency recovery plan. BioScience 70, 330–342 (2020).

Grill, G. et al. Mapping the world’s free-flowing rivers. Nature 569, 215–221 (2019).

Olden, J. D. et al. Hydrologic classification of Tanzanian rivers to support national water resource policy. Ecohydrology. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.2282 (2021).

Lin, P. et al. Global reconstruction of naturalized river flows at 2.94 million reaches. Water Resour. Res. 55, 6499–6516 (2019).

Yamazaki, D. et al. MERIT Hydro: a high-resolution global hydrography map based on latest topography dataset. Water Resour. Res. 55, 5053–5073 (2019).

Beck, H. E. et al. Bias correction of global high-resolution precipitation climatologies using streamflow observations from 9,372 catchments. J. Clim. 33, 1299–1315 (2020).

Do, H. X., Gudmundsson, L., Leonard, M. & Westra, S. The Global Streamflow Indices and Metadata Archive (GSIM)—part 1: the production of a daily streamflow archive and metadata. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 765–785 (2018).

Linke, S. et al. Global hydro-environmental sub-basin and river reach characteristics at high spatial resolution. Sci. Data 6, 283 (2019).

Dobrushin, R. L. Prescribing a system of random variables by conditional distributions. Theory Probab. Appl. 15, 458–486 (1970).

Schefzik, R., Flesch, J. & Goncalves, A. Fast identification of differential distributions in single-cell RNA-sequencing data with waddR. Bioinformatics 37, 3204–3211 (2021).

Reid, A. J. et al. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biol. Rev. 94, 849–873 (2019).

Wittemyer, G., Elsen, P., Bean, W. T., Burton, A. C. O. & Brashares, J. S. Accelerated human population growth at protected area edges. Science 321, 123–126 (2008).

Colvin, S. A. R. et al. Headwater streams and wetlands are critical for sustaining fish, fisheries, and ecosystem Services. Fisheries 44, 73–91 (2019).

Chen, K. & Olden, J. D. Threshold responses of riverine fish communities to land use conversion across regions of the world. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4952–4965 (2020).

Pardo, I. et al. The European reference condition concept: a scientific and technical approach to identify minimally-impacted river ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 420, 33–42 (2012).

Sauquet, E. et al. Classification and trends in intermittent river flow regimes in Australia, northwestern Europe and USA: a global perspective. J. Hydrol. 597, 126170 (2021).

Creed, I. F. et al. Enhancing protection for vulnerable waters. Nat. Geosci. 10, 809–815 (2017).

Abell, R. et al. Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. BioScience 58, 403–414 (2008).

Wilhite, D. A. in Coping with Drought Risk in Agriculture and Water Supply Systems: Drought Management and Policy Development in the Mediterranean, Vol. 26 (eds. Iglesias, A. et al.) 3–19 (Springer Science and Business Media, 2009).

Winemiller, K. O. et al. Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong. Science 351, 128–129 (2016).

Seyfried, M. S. & Wilcox, B. P. Scale and the nature of spatial variability: field examples having implications for hydrologic modeling. Water Resour. Res. 31, 173–184 (1995).

Hammond, J. C. et al. Spatial patterns and drivers of nonperennial flow regimes in the contiguous United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL090794 (2021).

Messager, M. L. et al. Global prevalence of non-perennial rivers and streams. Nature 594, 391–397 (2021).

Busch, M. H. et al. What’s in a name? Patterns, trends, and suggestions for defining non-perennial rivers and streams. Water 12, 1980 (2020).

Zipper, S. C. et al. Pervasive changes in stream intermittency across the United States. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 084033 (2021).

Jaeger, K. L., Olden, J. D. & Pelland, N. A. Climate change poised to threaten hydrologic connectivity and endemic fishes in dryland streams. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13894–13899 (2014).

Beaufort, A., Lamouroux, N., Pella, H., Datry, T. & Sauquet, E. Extrapolating regional probability of drying of headwater streams using discrete observations and gauging networks. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 22, 3033–3051 (2018).

Argerich, A. et al. Comprehensive multiyear carbon budget of a temperate headwater stream: carbon budget of a headwater stream. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 121, 1306–1315 (2016).

Molden, D. J., Shrestha, A. B., Nepal, S. & Immerzeel, W. W. in Water Security, Climate Change and Sustainable Development (eds. Biswas, A. K. & Tortajada, C.) 65–82 (Springer, 2016).

Kaletová, T. et al. Relevance of intermittent rivers and streams in agricultural landscape and their impact on provided ecosystem services—a Mediterranean case study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 2693 (2019).

Zimmer, M. A. et al. Zero or not? Causes and consequences of zero-flow stream gage readings. WIREs Water 7, e1436 (2020).

Wine, M. L. Toward strong science to support equitable water sharing in securitized transboundary watersheds. Biologia 9, 907–915 (2020).

Alsdorf, D. E. GEOPHYSICS: tracking fresh water from space. Science 301, 1491–1494 (2003).

Benstead, J. P. & Leigh, D. S. An expanded role for river networks. Nat. Geosci. 5, 678–679 (2012).

Allen, D. C. et al. Citizen scientists document long-term streamflow declines in intermittent rivers of the desert southwest, USA. Freshw. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1086/701483 (2019).

Joo, H. et al. Optimal stream gauge network design using entropy theory and importance of stream gauge stations. Entropy 21, 991 (2019).

Vörösmarty, C. et al. Global water data: a newly endangered species. Eos 82, 54–58 (2001).

Jordahl, K. et al. Geopandas/geopandas. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3946761 (2020).

Lin, P., Pan, M., Wood, E. F., Yamazaki, D. & Allen, G. H. A new vector-based global river network dataset accounting for variable drainage density. Sci. Data 8, 28 (2021).

Yu, S. et al. Evaluating a landscape-scale daily water balance model to support spatially continuous representation of flow intermittency throughout stream networks. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 24, 5279–5295 (2020).

Kennard, M. J. et al. Classification of natural flow regimes in Australia to support environmental flow management. Freshw. Biol. 55, 171–193 (2010).

Flow/No Flow Observations with Discharge Data from Probabilistic Stream Surveys (US EPA Office of Research and Development, 2021).

Rosenbaum, P. R. & Rubin, D. B. The bias due to incomplete matching. Biometrics 41, 103–116 (1985).

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Nature Sustainability

Tập 5 Số 7

586-592

Thông tin tác giả