Assessing in-class participation for EFL: considerations of effectiveness and fairness for different learning styles
Tóm tắt
This study investigates the effectiveness and fairness of teacher-led assessment of students’ in-class participation and its effect on actual participation levels and language test scores, taking into account the diversity of second language learners’ learning styles. The level of participation was measured across ten criteria over a one-semester period in four classes of beginner/intermediate level adult Korean students of English as a foreign language (EFL). The classes were divided into two test groups who had their level of participation assessed as part of their overall grade (n = 76) and two control groups whose participation was measured covertly according to the same criteria (n = 65), alongside a pre- and post-course general English proficiency test (the Oxford Quick Placement Test), and a questionnaire designed to ascertain a learner’s general learning style orientation. The results suggest a broad range of learning styles may be found even in mono-cultural language learning groups, dispelling the stereotype of the ‘quiet’, ‘rote-learning’ Asian student. There were only minor differences between test and control groups in terms of proficiency test scores and participation levels, suggesting that including participation as a measure of course achievement has little impact on performance. Learners with individualistic learning styles generally achieved lower proficiency test and participation scores than those with styles suited to in-class interaction. However, we also report partial evidence of improved proficiency test scores for learners with group-oriented learning styles at the expense of learners with individualistic learning styles in the test group (and vice-versa in the control group), an effect of pedagogy known as the ‘meshing hypothesis’ - a hypothesis that has often been criticised in the learning styles literature. The results suggest that including in-class participation as part of a measure of achievement for EFL courses may be both ineffective and unfair for those with certain learning styles, and greater care must be afforded to promote inclusivity of assessment practices given the diversity of learning styles that might be present within a given cohort.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bean, JC, & Peterson, D. (1998). Grading classroom participation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74, 33–40.
Brown, P, & Levinson, SC. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carstens, DS, Lee, MR, & Malone, LC. (2012). Discussion forum rubrics: Using rubrics to enhance and increase project management students’ participation in online discussions. Journal of Project, Program & Portfolio Management., 2(2), 35–53.
Coffield, F. (2012). Learning Styles: unreliable, invalid and impractical and yet still widely used. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Coffield, F, Moseley, D, Hall, E, & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning. A systematic and critical review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dallimore, EJ, Hertenstein, JH, & Platt, MB. (2004). Classroom participation and discussion effectiveness: Student-generated strategies. Communication Education, 53(1), 103–115.
Dallimore, EJ, Hertenstein, JH, & Platt, MB. (2010). Class participation in accounting courses: Factors that affect student comfort and learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(4), 613–629.
Dallimore, EJ, Hertenstein, JH, & Platt, MB. (2013). Impact of Cold-Calling on Student Voluntary Participation. Journal of Management Education, 37(3), 305–351.
Dancer, D, & Kamvounias, P. (2005). Student involvement in assessment: a project designed to assess class participation fairly and reliably. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 445–454.
DeCapua, A, & Wintergerst, A. (2005). Assessing and validating a learning styles instrument. System, 33, 1–16.
Domino, G. (1979). Interactive effects of achievement orientation and teaching style on academic achievement. ACT Research Report, 39, 1–9.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fritschner, LM. (2000). Inside the undergraduate college classroom: faculty and students differ on the meaning of student participation. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(3), 342–62.
Griffiths, C. (2012). Learning styles: traversing the quagmire’. In S Mercer, S Ryan, & M Williams (Eds.), Psychology for Language Learning: Insights from Research, Theory, and Practice (pp. 151–68). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Heyman, JE, & Sailors, JJ. (2011). Peer assessment of class participation: applying peer nomination to overcome rating inflation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(5), 605–618.
Hsieh, FY. (2014). The effect of cultural background and language proficiency on the use of oral communication strategies by second language learners of Chinese. System, 45, 1–16.
Kang, D. (2014). The effects of study-abroad experiences on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate, speaking abilities, and participation in classroom interaction. System, 42, 319–332.
Kennedy, P. (2002). Learning cultures and learning styles: myth-understandings about adult Hong Kong–Chinese learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21(5), 430–445.
Kim, HK, & Lee, S. (2012). Teacher’s use of funds of knowledge to promote class participation and engagement in an EFL context. In B Yoon & HK Kim (Eds.), Teachers’ Roles in Second Language Learning: Classroom Applications of Socio-cultural Theory (pp. 121–134). Seoul, Korea: Information Age Publishing.
Lee, G. (2009). Speaking up: Six Korean students’ oral participation in class discussions in US graduate seminars. English for Specific Purposes, 28(3), 142–156.
Littlewood, W, & Liu, NF. (1997). Why do many students appear reluctant to participate in classroom learning discourse? System, 25(3), 371–384.
Massa, LJ, & Mayer, RE. (2006). Testing the ATI hypothesis: Should multimedia instruction accommodate verbalizer-visualizer cognitive style? Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 321–336.
Mello, JA. (2010). The good, the bad and the controversial: The practicalities and pitfalls of the grading of class participation’. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(1), 77–97.
Park, C. (1997). Learning style preferences of Korean, Mexican, Armenian-American, and Anglo students in secondary schools. National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP). Bulletin, 81(585), 103.
Pashler, H, McDaniel, M, Rohrer, D, & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 106–199.
Peng, J. (2012). Towards an ecological understanding of willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms in China. System, 40(2), 203–213.
Reid, J. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87–110.
Reid, J (Ed.). (1995). Learning Styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom. New York: Heinle.
Richards, JC. (2014). Key Issues in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rogers, SL. (2011). Grading participation in college courses: Instructor attitudes and practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Albany: State University of New York.
Scollon, R, & Scollon, S. (1995). Intercultural communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tani, M. (2005). Quiet, but only in class: Reviewing the in-class participation of Asian students. In Higher Education in a Changing World: Proceedings of the 2005 Annual International Conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Inc. (HERDSA). Sydney, NSW: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.
Vandrick, S. (2000) Language, culture, class, gender and class participation. Paper presented at TESOL Annual International Convention, Vancouver, Canada
Weaver, RR, & Qi, J. (2005). Classroom organisation and participation: College students’ perceptions. Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), 570–601.
Wintergerst, A, & DeCapua, A, (1999). Learning Styles Indicator (LSI). Copyrighted by Wintergerst and DeCapua. Available through Ann Wintergerst, Department of Languages and Literatures, St. John’s University, Jamaica, New York, 11439
Wintergerst, A, & DeCapua, A. (2001). Exploring the learning styles of Russian-speaking students of English as a second language. The CATESOL Journal, 13, 23–46.
Wintergerst, A, DeCapua, A, & Verna, MA. (2003). Conceptualizing learning style modalities for ESL/EFL students. System, 31(1), 85–106.
Yu, L. (2001). Communicative language teaching in China: Progress and resistance’. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 194–198.