Aspects of interspecific interaction betweenReithrodontomys megalotis andMicrotus montanus in one acre enclosures

Asdell, S. A. (1964)Patterns of mammalian reproduction. 2nd ed. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, N. Y. 670 p. Bancroft, W. L. (1967) Record fecundity forReithrodontomys megalotis.J. Mammal. 48: 306–308. Birkenholz, D. E. (1967) The harvest mouse (R. megalotis) in central Illinois.Ill. State Acad Sci. Trans. 60: 49–53. Brummel, C. N. (1961) Some aspects of the life history and ecology of the western harvest mouse in southeastern South Dakota.Proc. S. D. Acad. Sci. 40: 85–92. Catlett, R. H. andH. S. Shellhammer (1962) A comparison of behavioral and biological characteristics of house mice and harvest mice.J. Mammal. 43: 133–144. Chitty, D. andH. Chitty (1962) Population trends among the voles at Lake Vyrnwy, 1923–60.Symp. Theriologicum. Brno, 1960. p. 67–76. Conley, W. H. (1971) Behavior, demography, and competition inMicrotus longicaudus andM. mexicanus. Ph. D. Thesis, Texas Tech. Univ., Lubbock, Texas, 46 p. Dunaway, P. B. (1968) Life history and populational aspects of the eastern harvest mouse.Amer. Midl. Nat. 79: 48–67. Fisher, R. A. (1958)The genetical theory of natural selection. 2nd revised ed. Dover, New York. 291 p. (originally published in 1929). Fisler, G. F. (1965) Adaptations and speciation in harvestmice of the marshes of San Francisco Bay.Univ. Calif. Publ. Zool. 77: 1–108. Fisler, G. F. (1971) Age structure and sex ratio in populations ofReithrodontomys.J. Mammal. 52: 653–662. Grant, P. R. (1971) Experimental studies of competitive interaction in a two species system. III.Microtus andPeromyscus species in enclosures.J. Anim. Ecol. 40: 323–50. Hall, K. andW. H. Newton (1946) The normal course of separation of the pubes in pregnant mice.J. Physiol. 104: 346–352. Hamilton, W. J., Jr. (1941) Reproduction of the field mouseMicrotus pennsylvanicus (Ord.).Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Mem. 237. 23 p. Hoffmann, R. S. (1958) The role of reproduction and mortality in population fluctuations of voles (Microtus).Ecol. Monogr. 28: 79–109. Keller, B. L. andC. J. Krebs (1970) Microtus population biology III. Reproductive changes in fluctuating populations ofM. ochrogaster andM. pennsylvanicus in Southern Indiana, 1965–67.Ecol. Monogr. 40: 263–294. Krebs, C. J. (1966) Demographic changes in fluctuating populations ofMicrotus californicus.Ecol. Monogr. 36: 239–273. Krebs, C. J. (1972)Ecology; the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Harper and Row. New York. 694 p. Krebs, C. J., B. L. Keller andR. H. Tamarin (1969)Microtus Population Biology: Demographic changes in fluctuating populations ofM. orchrogaster andM. pennsylvanicus in southern Indiana.Ecology 50: 587–607. Krebs, C. J., M. S. Gaines, B. L. Keller, J. H. Myers andR. H. Tamarin (1973) Population cycles in small rodents.Science 179: 35–41. Lack, D. (1966) Population studies of birds. Claredon, Press. Oxford. 341 p. Lerass, H. J. (1938) Observations on the growth and behavior of harvest mice.J. Mammal. 19: 441–444. Lidicker, W. Z. (1966) Ecological observations on a feral house mouse population declining to extinction.Ecol. Monogr. 36: 27–5. Long, C. A. (1962) Records of reproduction for harvest mice.J. Mammal. 43: 103–104. Metzgar, L. H. (1967) An experimental comparison of screech owl predation on resident and transient white-footed mice.J. Mammal. 48: 387–391. Packard, R. L. (1963) An ecological study of the fulvous harvest mouse in eastern Texas.Amer. Midl. Nat. 79: 63–88. Pitcher, E. J. (1973) Aspects of interspecific, interaction betweenReithrodontomys megalotis andMicrotus montanus in one acre enclosures. MS Thesis, Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho. 57 p. Sokal, R. R. andF. J. Rohlf (1969)Biometry; the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W. H. Freeman. San Francisco. 776 p. Svihla, R. D. (1931) Notes on desert and dusky harvest mice (Reithrodontomys megalotis megalotis andR. m. nigrescens).J. Mammal. 12: 363–365. Zukerman, S. (1953) The breeding seasons of mammals in captivity.Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 122: 827–950.