Articulatory suppression delays processing of abstract words: The role of inner speech

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology - Tập 75 Số 7 - Trang 1343-1354 - 2022
Chiara Fini1, Gian Daniele Zannino2, Matteo Orsoni3, Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo4,2, Mariagrazia Benassi3, Anna M. Borghi1,5
1Department of Dynamic, Clinical Psychology and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
2Laboratory of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, I.R.C.C.S. Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy
3Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
4Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy
5Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Italian National Research Council, Rome, Italy

Tóm tắt

Compared to concrete concepts, like “book,” abstract concepts expressed by words like “justice” are more detached from sensorial experiences, even though they are also grounded in sensorial modalities. Abstract concepts lack a single object as referent and are characterised by higher variability both within and across participants. According to the Word as Social Tool (WAT) proposal, owing to their complexity, abstract concepts need to be processed with the help of inner language. Inner language can namely help participants to re-explain to themselves the meaning of the word, to keep information active in working memory, and to prepare themselves to ask information from more competent people. While previous studies have demonstrated that the mouth is involved during abstract concepts’ processing, both the functional role and the mechanisms underlying this involvement still need to be clarified. We report an experiment in which participants were required to evaluate whether 78 words were abstract or concrete by pressing two different pedals. During the judgement task, they were submitted, in different blocks, to a baseline, an articulatory suppression, and a manipulation condition. In the last two conditions, they had to repeat a syllable continually and to manipulate a softball with their dominant hand. Results showed that articulatory suppression slowed down the processing of abstract more than that of concrete words. Overall results confirm the WAT proposal’s hypothesis that abstract concepts processing involves the mouth motor system and specifically inner speech. We discuss the implications for current theories of conceptual representation.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1086/650525

10.1037/bul0000021

10.1111/tops.12096

10.1126/science.1736359

10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.103

10.3758/BF03195471

10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02014

10.1017/S0305000920000070

10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001

10.1080/01690960344000026

10.3758/s13423-016-1028-3

10.1098/rstb.2017.0144

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.003.0013

10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116626

Bertinetto P. M., Burani C., Laudanna A., Marconi L., Ratti D., Rolando C., Thornton A. M. (2005). CoLFIS (Corpus e Lessico di Frequenza dell’Italiano Scritto) [Corpus and frequency lexicon of written Italian]. Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, CNR, http://www.istc.cnr.it/grouppage/colfisEng

10.1162/0898929054021102

10.1111/tops.12354

10.5334/joc.134

10.1016/j.plrev.2019.06.004

10.1098/rstb.2017.0134

10.1098/rstb.2017.0121

10.1007/978-1-4614-9539-0

10.1037/bul0000089

Borghi A. M., 2020, Embodied psychology: Thinking, feeling, and acting

10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00015

10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01498

10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5

10.1016/j.cogsys.2019.09.010

10.4324/9780203055069

10.1093/cercor/bhu057

10.1177/0956797620910748

10.3758/BRM.42.4.1042

10.1111/tops.12102

10.3758/s13423-015-0825-4

10.1098/rstb.2017.0135

10.1007/s00426-020-01438-6

10.1016/j.cortex.2017.10.021

Egger V., 1881, La parole intérieure: essai de psychologie descriptive

10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00838

10.1371/journal.pone.0067090

10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010

10.1371/journal.pone.0114615

10.2466/pms.1990.71.3.1043

10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211

10.1093/oso/9780198796640.001.0001

10.1016/j.jecp.2010.06.002

Loevenbruck H., 2018, Inner speech: New voices, 131

10.1098/rstb.2017.0137

10.7717/peerj.5987

10.1007/s10936-013-9252-8

Murphy G., 2004, The big book of concepts

10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x

10.31234/osf.io/5d6h7

10.3389/fnhum.2012.00275

10.3758/MC.38.8.1147

10.1016/j.bbr.2013.12.034

Piaget J. E. A. N., 1945, The formation of the symbol in children

Piaget J., 1976, La formation du symbole chez l’enfant

10.1038/nrn2811

10.1073/pnas.0907307107

Tomasino B., 2013, ” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7

10.1037/a0036477

10.1037/a0014504

10.1080/07350198709359146

10.3758/s13428-019-01249-7

10.1093/cercor/bht025

10.1016/j.jml.2020.104173

Vygotsky L. S., 1986, Thought and language

10.1080/09541440802205067

10.1037/xge0000014

10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.023