Argumentation in science education as an evolving concept: Following the object of activity

Berland, 2009, Making sense of argumentation and explanation, Science Education, 93, 26, 10.1002/sce.20286

Clark, 2007, Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments, Educational Psychology Review, 19, 343, 10.1007/s10648-007-9050-7

Cross, 2007, Argumentation: A strategy for improving achievement and revealing scientific identities, International Journal of Science Education, 30, 837, 10.1080/09500690701411567

Duschl, 2002, Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education, Studies in Science Education, 38, 39, 10.1080/03057260208560187

Engels, 1925, Dialectics

Engeström, 1987

Engeström, 1995, Objects, contradictions and collaboration in medical cognition: An activity-theoretical perspective, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 7, 395, 10.1016/0933-3657(95)00012-U

Engeström, 1996, Learning actions and knowledge creation in industrial work teams

Engeström, 1999, Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 63, 10.1023/A:1008648532192

Engeström, 1999, Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice, 377

Engeström, 2000, Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work, Ergonomics, 43, 960, 10.1080/001401300409143

Engeström, 2001, Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization, Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133, 10.1080/13639080020028747

Engeström, 2004, New forms of learning in co-configuration work, Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 11, 10.1108/13665620410521477

Engeström, 2005

Engeström, 2005, Object-oriented interagency: Toward understanding collective intentionality in distributed activity fields, 89

Engeström, 2005, From individual action to collective activity and back: Developmental work research as an interventionist methodology, 171

Engeström, 2005, Communication, discourse and activity, 139

Engeström, 2005, Introduction: In search of the Sampo, 9

Engeström, 2006, Development, movement and agency: Breaking away into mycorrhizae activities, 1

Engeström, 2012, Concept formation in the wild, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19, 201, 10.1080/10749039.2012.690813

Engeström, 2003, The discursive construction of collaborative care, Applied Linguistics, 24, 286, 10.1093/applin/24.3.286

Engeström, 2003, Spatial and temporal expansion of the object as a challenge for reorganizing work, 151

Erduran, 2004, TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse, Science Education, 88, 915, 10.1002/sce.20012

Erduran, 2015, Research trends on argumentation in science education: A journal content analysis from 1998-2014, International Journal of STEM Education, 2015, 2(5)

Jiménez-Aleixandre, 2008, Argumentation in science education: An overview, 3

Jiménez-Aleixandre, 2004, Scientific authority and empirical data in argument warrants about the prestige oil spill

Kaptelinin, 2005, The object of activity, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12, 4, 10.1207/s15327884mca1201_2

Kelly, 2002, Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing, Science Education, 86, 314, 10.1002/sce.10024

Kelly, 1998, Students' reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis, International Journal of Science Education, 20, 849, 10.1080/0950069980200707

Kuhn, 1991

Kuhn, 2003, The development of argument skills, Child Development, 74, 1245, 10.1111/1467-8624.00605

Kuhn, 2006, Fostering scientific argumentation by creating a need for students to attend to each other's claims and evidence, 370

Lazarou, 2012

Lazarou, 2016, Argumentation in science education as a systemic activity: An activity-theoretical perspective, International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 150, 10.1016/j.ijer.2016.07.008

Leont'ev, 1978

Leont'ev, 1981

Martin, 2009, Factors affecting the implementation of argument in the elementary science classroom. A longitudinal case study, Research in Science Education, 39, 17, 10.1007/s11165-007-9072-7

Marx

Marx, 1973

Marx, 1968

Mason, 1996, An analysis of children's construction of new knowledge through their use of reasoning and arguing in classroom discussions, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9, 411, 10.1080/0951839960090404

Naylor, 2007, Argumentation and primary science, Research in Science Education, 37, 17, 10.1007/s11165-005-9002-5

Nicolini, 2007, Stretching out and expanding work practice in time and space: The case of telemedicine, Human Relations, 60, 889, 10.1177/0018726707080080

Osborne, 2004, Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994, 10.1002/tea.20035

Thomas, 2006, A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis, American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237, 10.1177/1098214005283748

Toulmin, 2003

Tytler, 2003, Tracing young children's scientific reasoning, Research in Science Education, 33, 433, 10.1023/B:RISE.0000005250.04426.67

van Eemeren, 2004

Vygotsky, 1978

Zohar, 2002, Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35, 10.1002/tea.10008