Are Progressive Texts Necessarily Disruptive? Investigating Teacher Engagement with Gendered Textbooks in Ugandan Classrooms

Teachers College Record - Tập 123 Số 1 - Trang 1-26 - 2021
Lydia Namatende-Sakwa1
1Kyambogo University

Tóm tắt

Background Undergirding the dominant research focus on gender representation in textbooks is the assumption that making texts progressive in their construction of gender is a panacea for equality in the classroom. As this study demonstrates, however, textbooks containing traditional representations of gender can be used to challenge biases, while textbooks with progressive representations can be undermined. This suggests that “fixing” gender in textbooks to make them progressive does not guarantee how teachers enact them in the classroom. Indeed, the predominant focus on texts, rather than teachers’ gender knowledge base, has had little impact on classroom practice. This justifies the shift to “teacher talk around the text,” which, as scholars argue, should be the focus of research. Purpose and Research Questions This study, which goes beyond the dominant focus on textbooks to draw attention to how teachers take them up, was guided by the following research questions: How do teachers use gendered textbooks in the classroom? What discourses and practices circulate? What informs teacher selection of textbooks? Is gender one of the considerations? Context The study was situated in Uganda, a multiethnic patriarchal developing country in East Africa. Research Design A qualitative case study approach was taken up with two cases, specifically an affluent girls’ single-sex school and a less affluent mixed school. This illuminated how gender is constructed in relation to other socially constructed categories. Data Collection and Analysis The investigation involved textual analysis, classroom observations, and interviews, which were analyzed using feminist poststructural discourse analysis to identify and name discourses and discursive practices cited during the classroom interactions. Findings/Results Overall, the teachers’ use of textbooks in both cases challenged previous research, which assumed that teachers necessarily take up gender as constructed in textbooks. This overlooked teachers’ gendered truths, which, as shown in my study, informed how they took up and/or rejected both traditional and transgressive texts. Traditional gendered texts, which illuminated dominant realities, surprisingly offered more disruptive potential for engaging with gendered hierarchies than did progressive texts, which constructed marginal realities and/or realities incongruent with dominant truths. Conclusions/Recommendations The study has implications for teacher education in Uganda, which should prepare teachers by unsettling the taken-for-granted gender knowledge base, through disrupting traditional gendered ways of thinking/discourses. This will create possibility for producing teachers who can critically navigate gendered texts, by deconstructing gendered power relations during classroom engagement with texts. Indeed, as research has indicated, teachers are capable of challenging gender bias if well prepared. It will also be useful for researchers to observe lessons in which expert teachers engage with gendered textbooks, providing a model to inform teacher education.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abolaji M. S., 2015, Gender representation in learning materials: International perspectives, 150

Appleby R., 2015, Gender representation in learning materials: International perspectives, 105

Bag E., 2015, Gender representation in learning materials: International perspectives, 64

Bantebya K. G., 2006, Women, work and domestic virtue in Uganda

10.1080/14681366.2012.669394

10.1057/9780230501263

10.1126/science.7434028

Chew K., 2013, Care2

Coffey A., 2000, Feminism and the classroom teacher: Research, praxis and pedagogy

Connell R. W., 2008, Gender, 2

Davies B., 2003, Frogs and snails and feminist tales: Preschool children and gender

Davies B., 2004, Gender in Japanese preschools: Frogs and snails and feminist tales in Japan

10.1080/0950069032000138888

10.7208/chicago/9780226206868.001.0001

Eslami Z. R., 2015, Gender representation of gender in learning materials: An international perspective, 86

10.1177/0011392112459744

Foucault M., 1980, Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings (1972–1977)

10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.03.005

10.1080/09540253.2014.933190

Francis B., 1998, Power plays: Primary school children's constructions of gender, power and adult work

10.1177/000494410805200307

10.1080/09500789009541271

10.4324/9780203121375

Hideto D. H., 2004, JALT, 1005

10.17763/haer.56.2.y11m78k58t4052x2

10.1080/00131911.2014.910178

10.1080/09540250903359452

10.1080/09540259721204

10.1111/aeq.12068

10.4135/9781452225548.n5

10.1016/j.linged.2014.07.002

10.1075/dapsac.2

Mac an Ghaill M., 1994, Making of men: Masculinities, sexualities, and schooling, 15

10.1177/0003122412451728

Messner M. A., 2002, Taking the field: Women, men and sports

10.1080/09540250120081751

Moore E., 2015, Gender representation in learning materials: International perspectives, 164

Muhwezi K. M., 2003, Gender sensitive educational policy and practice: Uganda case study

10.4324/9781315764092-6

Nakayiwa F., 2016, African Journal of Rural Development, 1, 193

10.1080/09540253.2018.1543858

Namatende-Sakwa L., 2018, Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 26, 609

10.1080/09518398.2017.1422285

10.1558/genl.34847

10.1007/s10649-006-5423-y

O'Connor J. P., 2000, Female Education in Mathematics and Science in Africa (FEMSA)

10.1007/s10649-011-9348-8

Ott C., 2015, Gender representation in learning materials: International perspectives, 52

Paechter C., 2007, Being boys, being girls: Learning masculinities and femininities

Pawelczyk J., 2015, Gender representation in learning materials: International perspectives, 193

Phipps A., 2014, Politics of the body: Gender in a neoliberal and neoconservative age

10.2307/3586584

10.1207/S15327701JLIE0101_4

10.1086/493756

10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01195.x

Ropers-Huilman B., 1998, Feminist teaching in theory and practice: Situating power and knowledge in poststructural classrooms

Rujumba K., 2012, Pittsburg Post Gazette

10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00267.x

10.1080/09518390050156422

10.1177/136216880000400204

10.1057/9780230505582

Sunderland J., 2015, Gender representation in learning materials: International perspectives, 19

Sunderland J., 2015, Gender representation in learning materials: International perspectives, 19

10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00034-6

Tainio L., 2015, Gender representation in learning materials, 125

Thorne B., 1993, Gender play: Girls and boys in school

10.1007/978-1-349-17661-8_7

Walkerdine V., 1990, School girl fictions

Walkerdine V., 1998, Counting girls out: Girls and mathematics

Weedon C., 1997, Feminist practice and poststructural theory, 2

Yin R. K., 2003, Case study research: Design and methods, 3

Youdell D., 2006, Impossible bodies, impossible selves: Exclusions and student subjectivities

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Teachers College Record

Tập 123 Số 1

1-26

Thông tin tác giả