Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Công việc và nguồn lực từ việc sử dụng phương tiện kỹ thuật số trong giáo viên
Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung - Trang 1-11 - 2023
Tóm tắt
Việc sử dụng phương tiện kỹ thuật số đối với một bộ phận giáo viên liên quan tới trải nghiệm căng thẳng tăng cao. Căng thẳng do những khía cạnh tiêu cực của việc sử dụng phương tiện kỹ thuật số gây ra được nghiên cứu chủ yếu dưới thuật ngữ „căng thẳng kỹ thuật số“ hoặc „căng thẳng công nghệ“ trong các nghiên cứu quốc tế. Tuy nhiên, đối với giáo viên Đức, các phát hiện vẫn còn ít ỏi. Ngược lại, một bộ phận khác của giáo viên dường như gặp ít khó khăn hơn trong việc triển khai phương tiện kỹ thuật số vào đời sống học đường và thay vào đó có thể hưởng lợi từ những ưu điểm của phương tiện kỹ thuật số. Câu hỏi về việc liệu những lợi ích này có thể trở thành nguồn lực tích cực đối với căng thẳng và tình trạng sức khỏe của giáo viên vẫn chưa được xem xét một cách đầy đủ. Mục tiêu của nghiên cứu là tập hợp và hệ thống hóa các yếu tố ảnh hưởng tiềm năng của việc sử dụng phương tiện kỹ thuật số đến căng thẳng và sức khỏe của giáo viên từ Đức, cũng như đánh giá tầm quan trọng của chúng. Phương pháp Group-concept-mapping (GCM) đã được thực hiện với 44 giáo viên tương lai tại Đại học Koblenz-Landau. Cấu trúc thu được cho thấy sự quan trọng của những ảnh hưởng tích cực từ việc sử dụng phương tiện kỹ thuật số đến sức khỏe của giáo viên, cũng như tầm quan trọng của các điều kiện khung học đường.
Từ khóa
#căng thẳng kỹ thuật số #giáo viên #phương tiện kỹ thuật số #sức khỏe #điều kiện học đườngTài liệu tham khảo
Al-Fudail M (2008) An exploration of teacher stress when using ICT in technology-rich classrooms. Dissertation, University of London
Ayyagari R, Grover V, Purvis R (2011) Technostress: technological antecedents and implications. MISQ 35:831–858. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409963
Bar H, Mentch L (2017) R‑CMap—an open-source software for concept mapping. Eval Program Plann 60:284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.018
BigBlueButton (2022) BigBlueButton. https://bigbluebutton.org. Zugegriffen: 18. Juni 2022
Borg I (2010) Multidimensionale Skalierung. In: Wolf C, Best H (Hrsg) Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse, 1. Aufl. VS, Wiesbaden, S 391–420
Brod C (1984) Technostress. The human cost of the computer revolution. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin (2020) Stressreport Deutschland 2019. https://www.baua.de/DE/Angebote/Publikationen/Berichte/Stressreport-2019.html. Zugegriffen: 10. Okt. 2022
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (2019) Verwaltungsvereinbarung – DigitalPakt Schule 2019 bis 2024. https://www.digitalpaktschule.de/files/VV_DigitalPaktSchule_Web.pdf. Zugegriffen: 19. Okt. 2022
Cascio WF, Montealegre R (2016) How technology is changing work and organizations. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav 3:349–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352
Cerratto-Pargman T (2019) Unpacking emergent teaching practices with digital technology. In: Cerratto-Pargman T, Jahnke I (Hrsg) Emergent practices and material conditions in learning and teaching with technologies, 1. Aufl. Springer, Cham, S 33–52
Çoklar AN, Efilti E, Sahin YL et al (2016) Investigation of techno-stress levels of teachers who were included in technology integration processes. Turk Online J Educ Technol 16:1331–1339
Demerouti E, Nachreiner F (2019) Zum Arbeitsanforderungen-Arbeitsressourcen-Modell von Burnout und Arbeitsengagement – Stand der Forschung. Z Arb Wiss 73:119–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-018-0100-4
Deutsches Institut für Medizinische Dokumentation und Information (2005) ICF – Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit. World Health Organization. https://www.bfarm.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Kodiersysteme/klassifikationen/icf/icfbp2005_zip.html?nn=841246&cms_dlConfirm=true&cms_calledFromDoc=841246. Zugegriffen: 26. Sept. 2022
Dong Y, Xu C, Chai CS et al (2020) Exploring the structural relationship among teachers’ technostress, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), computer self-efficacy and school support. Asia Pac Educ Res 29:147–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00461-5
Donnelly JP (2017) A systematic review of concept mapping dissertations. Eval Program Plann 60:186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.010
Dragano N, Riedel-Heller SG, Lunau T (2021) Haben digitale Technologien bei der Arbeit Einfluss auf die psychische Gesundheit? Nervenarzt 92:1111–1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-021-01192-z
Drossel K, Eickelmann B, Schaumburg H et al (2019) Nutzung digitaler Medien und Prädiktoren aus der Perspektive der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer im internationalen Vergleich. In: Eickelmann B, Bos W, Gerick J et al (Hrsg) ICILS 2018 #Deutschland. Computer- und informationsbezogene Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im zweiten internationalen Vergleich und Kompetenzen im Bereich Computational Thinking, 1. Aufl. Waxmann, Münster, S 205–240
Effiyanti T, Sagala GH (2018) Technostress among teachers: a confirmation of its stressors and antecedent. Int J Educ Econom Dev 9:134–148. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEED.2018.092197
Efilti E, Çoklar NA (2019) Teachers’ technostress levels as an indicator of their psychological capital levels. Univers J Educ Res 7:413–421. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070214
Fischer T, Reuter M, Riedl R (2021) The digital stressors scale: development and validation of a new survey instrument to measure digital stress perceptions in the workplace context. Front Psychol 12:607598. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.607598
Fit4future (2020) E‑Teaching in Deutschland. planero GmbH. https://kids.fit-4-future.de/downloads/fit4future_Umfrage_E-Teaching_Abschlussbericht_100620.pdf. Zugegriffen: 9. Juni 2022
Gimpel H, Lanzl J, Regal C et al (2019) Gesund digital arbeiten?! Eine Studie zu digitalem Stress in Deutschland. Projektgruppe Wirtschaftsinformatik des Fraunhofer FIT. https://www.fim-rc.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Gimpel_etal_2019_Gesund_digital_arbeiten-Eine_Studie_zu_digitalem_Stress_in_Deutschland.pdf. Zugegriffen: 11. Okt. 2022
Hardwig T (2021) Digitalisierung der Arbeit – die Bedeutung kollaborativer Anwendungen. In: Hardwig T, Weißmann M (Hrsg) Eine neue Qualität der Zusammenarbeit im Unternehmen: Die Arbeit mit Kollaborationsplattformen gestalten, 1. Aufl. Kooperationsstelle Hochschulen und Gewerkschaften der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, S 17–36
Hassan N, Yaakob SA, Halif MM et al (2019) The effects of technostress creators and organizational commitment among school teachers. Asian J Univ Educ 15:92–102. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v15i3.7563
Joo YJ, Lim KY, Kim NH (2016) The effects of secondary teachers’ technostress on the intention to use technology in South Korea. Comput Educ 95:114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.004
Jude N, Ziehm J, Goldhammer F et al (2020) Digitalisierung an Schulen – eine Bestandsaufnahme. DIPF | Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation. https://www.pedocs.de/volltexte/2020/20522/pdf/Jude_et_al_2020_Digitalisierung_an_Schulen.pdf. Zugegriffen: 11. Okt. 2022
Kane MA, Trochim WMK (2007) Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. SAGE, Thousand Oaks
Klusmann U, Waschke N (2018) Gesundheit und Wohlbefinden im Lehrerberuf, 1. Aufl. Hogrefe, Göttingen
Kultusministerkonferenz (2016) Bildung in der digitalen Welt. Strategie der Kultusministerkonferenz. Kultusministerkonferenz. https://www.kmk.org/fileadmin/Dateien/pdf/PresseUndAktuelles/2017/Strategie_neu_2017_datum_1.pdf. Zugegriffen: 11. Okt. 2022
Kuusimäki A‑M, Uusitalo-Malmivaara L, Tirri K (2019) The role of digital school-home communication in teacher well-being. Front Psychol 10:2257. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02257
Longman SM D (2013) A comparison of the perceptions of technostress experienced by teachers versus technology used by teachers in elementary education in a Southeastern school district. Dissertation, Southeastern Louisiana University
Mauss A (2020) Digitalpakt Schule und Digitalisierung an Schulen. Ergebnisse einer GEW-Mitgliederbefragung 2020. https://www.gew.de/index.php?eID=dumpFile&t=f&f=97283&token=1fff3c48386bb347b9cd047b05652541d9cc0cba&sdownload=&n=202004-Mitgliederbefr-Digitalisierung.pdf. Zugegriffen: 13. Juni 2022
Müller O, Rohde T (2022) ONCOO. https://www.oncoo.de. Zugegriffen: 18. Juni 2022
Mußmann F, Hardwig T, Riethmüller M et al (2021) Digitalisierung im Schulsystem 2021. Arbeitszeit, Arbeitsbedingungen, Rahmenbedingungen und Perspektiven von Lehrkräften in Deutschland. Kooperationsstelle Hochschulen und Gewerkschaften der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. https://www.gew.de/fileadmin/media/sonstige_downloads/hv/Service/Presse/2021/2021-09-29-STUDIE-Digitalisierung-im-Schulsystem-2021-Gesamtbericht-web.pdf. Zugegriffen: 11. Okt. 2022
Özgür H (2020) Relationships between teachers’ technostress, technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), school support and demographic variables: a structural equation modeling. Comput Human Behav 112:106468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106468
Park J‑C, Kim S, Lee H (2020) Effect of work-related smartphone use after work on job burnout: moderating effect of social support and organizational politics. Comput Human Behav 105:106194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106194
Passey D (2021) Digital technologies—and teacher wellbeing? Educ Sci 11:11030117. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030117
R Core Team (2022) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org, Vienna
Ragu-Nathan TS, Tarafdar M, Ragu-Nathan BS et al (2008) The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: conceptual development and empirical validation. Inf Syst Res 19:417–433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165
Robert Koch Institut (2015) Gesundheit in Deutschland 2015. https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Gesundheitsmonitoring/Gesundheitsberichterstattung/GesInDtld/gesundheit_in_deutschland_2015.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. Zugegriffen: 26. Sept. 2022
Rosas SR, Kane M (2012) Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: a pooled study analysis. Eval Program Plann 35:236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.10.003
Sailer M, Murböck J, Fischer F (2017) Digitale Bildung an bayerischen Schulen – Digitale Bildung an bayerischen Schulen. Infrastruktur, Konzepte, Lehrerbildung und Unterricht. Vereinigung der Bayerischen Wirtschaft e. V. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350121878_Digitale_Bildung_an_bayerischen_Schulen_vor_und_wahrend_der_Corona-Pandemie. Zugegriffen: 11. Okt. 2022
Schaumburg H, Prasse D (2019) Medien und Schule. Theorie – Forschung – Praxis. UTB, Bad Heilbrunn
Stan R (2022) Personality traits, technology-related teaching skills, and coping mechanisms as antecedents of teachers’ job-related affective well-being and burnout in compulsory and higher education online teaching settings. Front Psychol 13:792642. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.792642
Syvänen A, Mäkiniemi J‑P, Syrjä S et al (2016) When does the educational use of ICT become a source of technostress for Finnish teachers? Seminar 12:96–109. https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.2281
Tarafdar M, Gupta A, Turel O (2013) The dark side of information technology use. Info Systems J 23:269–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12015
Tarafdar M, Pullins EB, Ragu-Nathan TS (2015) Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Info Systems J 25:103–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12042
Techniker Krankenkasse (2021) Entspann dich, Deutschland! TK-Stressstudie 2021. Techniker Krankenkasse. https://www.tk.de/resource/blob/2116464/9ff316aaf08870ed54aa8a664502ac67/2021-stressstudie-data.pdf. Zugegriffen: 11. Okt. 2022
Ter Hoeven CL, van Zoonen W (2015) Flexible work designs and employee well-being: examining the effects of resources and demands. N Technol Work Employ 30:237–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12052
Trochim WMK (1989) An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann 12:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(89)90016-5
Trochim WMK (1993) The reliability of concept mapping. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American evaluation association, dallas, texas, november 6, 1993. http://www.billtrochim.net/research/Reliable/reliable.htm. Zugegriffen: 11. Okt. 2022
Tulowitzki P, Gerick J (2020) Schulleitung in der digitalisierten Welt. Empirische Befunde zum Schulmanagement. Dtsch Sch 112:324–337. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:21854
Wiedenbeck M, Züll C (2010) Clusteranalyse. In: Wolf C, Best H (Hrsg) Handbuch der sozialwissenschaftlichen Datenanalyse, 1. Aufl. VS, Wiesbaden, S 525–552