Application of Object-Based Time-Domain Diagnostics for Tracking Precipitation Systems in Convection-Allowing Models

Weather and Forecasting - Tập 29 Số 3 - Trang 517-542 - 2014
Adam J. Clark1, Randy Bullock2, Tara Jensen2, Ming Xue3, Fanyou Kong4
1Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, and NOAA/OAR/ National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma
2Developmental Testbed Center, Boulder, Colorado
3Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, and School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
4* Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Tóm tắt

Abstract Meaningful verification and evaluation of convection-allowing models requires approaches that do not rely on point-to-point matches of forecast and observed fields. In this study, one such approach—a beta version of the Method for Object-Based Diagnostic Evaluation (MODE) that incorporates the time dimension [known as MODE time-domain (MODE-TD)]—was applied to 30-h precipitation forecasts from four 4-km grid-spacing members of the 2010 Storm-Scale Ensemble Forecast system with different microphysics parameterizations. Including time in MODE-TD provides information on rainfall system evolution like lifetime, timing of initiation and dissipation, and translation. The simulations depicted the spatial distribution of time-domain precipitation objects across the United States quite well. However, all simulations overpredicted the number of objects, with the Thompson microphysics scheme overpredicting the most and the Morrison method the least. For the smallest smoothing radius and rainfall threshold used to define objects [8 km and 0.10 in. (1 in. = 2.54 cm), respectively], the most common object duration was 3 h in both models and observations. With an increased smoothing radius and rainfall threshold, the most common duration became shorter. The simulations depicted the diurnal cycle of object frequencies well, but overpredicted object frequencies uniformly across all forecast hours. The simulations had spurious maxima in initiating objects at the beginning of the forecast and a corresponding spurious maximum in dissipating objects slightly later. Examining average object velocities, a slow bias was found in the simulations, which was most pronounced in the Thompson member. These findings should aid users and developers of convection-allowing models and motivate future work utilizing time-domain methods for verifying high-resolution forecasts.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Accadia, 2003, Sensitivity of precipitation forecast skill scores to bilinear interpolation and a simple nearest-neighbor average method on high-resolution verification grids, Wea. Forecasting, 18, 918, 10.1175/1520-0434(2003)018<0918:SOPFSS>2.0.CO;2

Adams-Selin, 2013, Sensitivity of bow-echo simulation to microphysical parameterizations, Wea. Forecasting, 28, 1188, 10.1175/WAF-D-12-00108.1

Ahijevych, 2004, Initiation of precipitation episodes relative to elevated terrain, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 2763, 10.1175/JAS3307.1

Baldwin, 1997, 54

Bryan, 2012, Sensitivity of a simulated squall line to horizontal resolution and parameterization of microphysics, Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 202, 10.1175/MWR-D-11-00046.1

Bullock, 2011

Carbone, 2002, Inferences of predictability associated with warm season precipitation episodes, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 2033, 10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<2033:IOPAWW>2.0.CO;2

Casati, 2008, Forecast verification: Current status and future directions, Meteor. Appl., 15, 3, 10.1002/met.52

Chen, 2001, Coupling an advanced land surface–hydrology model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model description and implementation, Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 569, 10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2

Chou, 1994

Clark, 2009, A comparison of precipitation forecast skill between small convection-allowing and large convection-parameterizing ensembles, Wea. Forecasting, 24, 1121, 10.1175/2009WAF2222222.1

Clark, 2010, Neighborhood-based verification of precipitation forecasts from convection-allowing NCAR WRF model simulations and the operational NAM, Wea. Forecasting, 25, 1495, 10.1175/2010WAF2222404.1

Clark, 2012, An overview of the 2010 Hazardous Weather Testbed Experimental Forecast Program Spring Experiment, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 55, 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00040.1

Clark, 2012, Forecasting tornado pathlengths using a three-dimensional object identification algorithm applied to convection-allowing forecasts, Wea. Forecasting, 27, 1090, 10.1175/WAF-D-11-00147.1

Clark, 2013, Tornado pathlength forecasts from 2010 to 2011 using ensemble updraft helicity, Wea. Forecasting, 10.1175/WAF-D-12-00038.1

Davis, 2006, Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts. Part I: Methodology and application to mesoscale rain areas, Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 1772, 10.1175/MWR3145.1

Davis, 2006, Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts. Part II: Application to convective rain systems, Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 1785, 10.1175/MWR3146.1

Davis, 2009, The Method for Object-Based Diagnostic Evaluation (MODE) applied to numerical forecasts from the 2005 NSSL/SPC Spring Program, Wea. Forecasting, 24, 1252, 10.1175/2009WAF2222241.1

Dawson, 2010, Comparison of evaporation and cold pool development between single-moment and multimoment bulk microphysics schemes in idealized simulations of tornadic thunderstorms, Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 1152, 10.1175/2009MWR2956.1

Duda, 2013, The impact of large-scale forcing on skill of simulated convective initiation and upscale evolution with convection-allowing grid-spacings in the WRF, Wea. Forecasting, 10.1175/WAF-D-13-00005.1

Ebert, 2000, Verification of precipitation in weather systems: Determination of systematic errors, J. Hydrol., 239, 179, 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00343-7

Ebert, 2009, Toward better understanding of the contiguous rain area (CRA) method for spatial forecast verification, Wea. Forecasting, 24, 1401, 10.1175/2009WAF2222252.1

Gao, 2004, A three-dimensional variational data analysis method with recursive filter for Doppler radars, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 21, 457, 10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<0457:ATVDAM>2.0.CO;2

Hong, 2006, The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6), J. Korean Meteor. Soc., 42, 129

Hu, 2007, Impact of configurations of rapid intermittent assimilation of WSR-88D radar data for the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City tornadic thunderstorm case, Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 507, 10.1175/MWR3313.1

Hu, 2006, 3DVAR and cloud analysis with WSR-88D level-II data for the prediction of Fort Worth tornadic thunderstorms. Part I: Cloud analysis and its impact, Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 675, 10.1175/MWR3092.1

Janjić, 2002

Jensen, 2010

Johnson, 2012, Verification and calibration of neighborhood and object-based probabilistic precipitation forecasts from a multimodel convection-allowing ensemble, Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 3054, 10.1175/MWR-D-11-00356.1

Johnson, 2013, Object-based evaluation of a storm-scale ensemble during the 2009 NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Experiment, Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 1079, 10.1175/MWR-D-12-00140.1

Johnson, 2011, Hierarchical cluster analysis of a convection-allowing ensemble during the Hazardous Weather Testbed 2009 Spring Experiment. Part I: Development of the object-oriented cluster analysis method for precipitation fields, Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 3673, 10.1175/MWR-D-11-00015.1

Johnson, 2011, Hierarchical cluster analysis of a convection-allowing ensemble during the Hazardous Weather Testbed 2009 Spring Experiment. Part II: Ensemble clustering over the whole experiment period, Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 3694, 10.1175/MWR-D-11-00016.1

Johnson, 2013, Object-based evaluation of the impact of horizontal grid spacing on convection-allowing forecasts, Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 3413, 10.1175/MWR-D-13-00027.1

Jung, 2012, Ensemble Kalman filter analyses of the 29–30 May 2004 Oklahoma tornadic thunderstorm using one- and two-moment bulk microphysics schemes, with verification against polarimetric radar data, Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 1457, 10.1175/MWR-D-11-00032.1

Kain, 2008, Some practical considerations regarding horizontal resolution in the first generation of operational convection-allowing NWP, Wea. Forecasting, 23, 931, 10.1175/WAF2007106.1

Kain, 2010, Assessing advances in the assimilation of radar data and other mesoscale observations within a collaborative forecasting–research environment, Wea. Forecasting, 25, 1510, 10.1175/2010WAF2222405.1

Kain, 2010, Extracting unique information from high-resolution forecast models: Monitoring selected fields and phenomena every time step, Wea. Forecasting, 25, 1536, 10.1175/2010WAF2222430.1

Kain, 2013, A feasibility study for probabilistic convection initiation forecasts based on explicit numerical guidance, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00264.1

Kong, 2010

Lack, 2010, An object-oriented multiscale verification scheme, Wea. Forecasting, 25, 79, 10.1175/2009WAF2222245.1

Lakshmanan, 2009, An efficient, general-purpose technique for identifying storm cells in geospatial images, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 523, 10.1175/2008JTECHA1153.1

Lim, 2010, Development of an effective double-moment cloud microphysics scheme with prognostic cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) for weather and climate models, Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 1587, 10.1175/2009MWR2968.1

Lorenz, 1969, The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion, Tellus, 21, 289, 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1969.tb00444.x

Mellor, 1982, Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems, Rev. Geophys., 20, 851, 10.1029/RG020i004p00851

Miller, 2012

Mlawer, 1997, Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the long-wave, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16 663, 10.1029/97JD00237

Morrison, 2005, A new double-moment microphysics parameterization for application in cloud and climate models. Part I: Description, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 1665, 10.1175/JAS3446.1

Nachamkin, 2004, Mesoscale verification using meteorological composites, Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 941, 10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0941:MVUMC>2.0.CO;2

Putnam, 2014, The analysis and prediction of microphysical states and polarimetric variables in a mesoscale convective system using double-moment microphysics, multinetwork radar data, and the ensemble Kalman filter, Mon. Wea. Rev., 10.1175/MWR-D-13-00042.1

R Development Core Team, cited 2013: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Available online at http://www.R-project.org.]

Roberts, 2008, Scale-selective verification of rainfall accumulations from high-resolution forecasts of convective events, Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 78, 10.1175/2007MWR2123.1

Rogers, 2009

Schwartz, 2010, Toward improved convection-allowing ensembles: Model physics sensitivities and optimizing probabilistic guidance with small ensemble membership, Wea. Forecasting, 25, 263, 10.1175/2009WAF2222267.1

Skamarock, 2009, The impact of positive-definite moisture transport on NWP precipitation forecasts, Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 488, 10.1175/2008MWR2583.1

Skamarock, 2008

Snyder, 2003, Assimilation of simulated Doppler radar observations with an ensemble Kalman filter, Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 1663, 10.1175//2555.1

Thompson, 2004, Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part I: Description and sensitivity analysis, Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 519, 10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0519:EFOWPU>2.0.CO;2

Tong, 2005, Ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of Doppler radar data with a compressible nonhydrostatic model: OSS experiments, Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 1789, 10.1175/MWR2898.1

Tuttle, 2006, Corridors of warm season precipitation in the central United States, Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 2297, 10.1175/MWR3188.1

Wernli, 2008, SAL—A novel quality measure for the verification of quantitative precipitation forecasts, Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 4470, 10.1175/2008MWR2415.1

Xue, 2003, The Advanced Regional Prediction System (ARPS), storm-scale numerical weather prediction and data assimilation, Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 82, 139, 10.1007/s00703-001-0595-6

Xue, 2008

Xue, 2010