Apomixis, hybridization, and taxonomic complexity in eastern north AmericanAmelanchier (Rosaceae)

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 31 - Trang 345-354 - 1996
Christopher S. Campbell1, Wesley A. Wright1
1Department of Plant Biology and Pathology, University of Maine, Orono, U.S.A.

Tóm tắt

Apomixis and hybridization together contribute to taxonomic complexity inAmelanchier. Hybridization combines genetically divergent genomes and spawns new forms that apomixis perpetuates. Apomixis is aposporous, facultative, and pseudogamous in the genus, and apomicts are generally polyploid, pollen fertile, and pollinated by generalists. That gene flow actually occurs is empirically evident. As apomixis is genetically dominant over sexuality, hybrids involving at least one apomictic parent are apomictic. Clonal reproduction may thus perpetuate F1 individuals and generate agamospecies. Alternatively hybrids may interbreed and backcross to create hybrid swarms or cross with species other than the parents. In eastern North America, the abundance of published names and general taxonomic confusion in the genus doubtless result at least in part from this interplay of apomixis and hybridization. The roles of apomixis and hybridization in diversification withinAmelanchier are examined in light of new data about breeding system of an apomictic, hybrid microspecies, informally namedA. “erecta” and its formation of a hybrid swarm with anotherAmelanchier apomict,A. laevis.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Asker S.E. &Jerling L. (1992):Apomixis in plants, CRC Press, Boca Raton.

Bayer R.J. (1987): Evolution and phylogenetic relationships of theAntennaria (Asteraceae: Inuleae) polyploid agamic complexes.Biol. Zentralbl. 106: 683–698.

Cinq-Mars L. (1971): Le genreAmelanchier au Québec.Naturaliste Canad. 98: 329–346.

Cruise J.E. (1964): Studies of natural hybrids inAmelanchier.Canad. J. Bot. 42: 651–663.

Czapik R. (1994): How to detect apomixis inAngiospermae.Polish Bot. Stud. 8: 13–21.

Dibble A.C. (1995):Conservation biology of shadbush, Amelanchier (Rosaceae):Evidence from systematics, population structure, and reproductive ecology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maine, Orono.

Dickinson T.A. &Phipps J.B. (1985): Studies inCrataegus L. (Rosaceae: Maloideae). XIII. Degree and pattern of phenotypic variation inCrataegus sect.Crus-galli in Ontario.Syst. Bot. 10: 322–337.

Favarger C. &Correvon P. (1967): Mise en évidence de “races chromosomiques” chez l'Amélanchier.Trav. Inst. Bot. Univ. Neuchâtel 14: 215–218.

Grant V. (1981):Plant speciation. Columbia University Press, New York.

Hinds H.R. (1986):Flora of New Brunswick. Primrose Press, Fredericton.

Lalonde L.-M. (1957): A newAmelanchier of eastern Canada.Rhodora 59: 119–122.

Marshall D.R. &Weir B.S. (1979): Maintenance of genetic variation in apomictic plant populations. I. Single locus models.Heredity 42: 159–172.

Nielsen E.L. (1939): A taxonomic study of the genusAmelanchier in Minnesota.Amer. Midl. Naturalist 22: 160–208.

Rieseberg L.H. &Wendel J.F. (1993): Introgression and its consequences. In:Harrison R.G. (ed.),Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 70–109.

Robinson W.A. (1982): Experimental taxonomy in the genusAmelanchier. II. Do the taxa inAmelanchier form an agamic complex?Rhodora 84: 85–100.

Rohlf F.J. (1993):NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Exeter Software, Setauket.

Roland A.E. &Smith E.C. (1969):The flora of Nova Scotia. The Nova Scotia Department of Education, Halifax.

SAS Institute, Inc. (1990):Statistical analysis system. SAS Institute, Cary.

Wiegand K.M. (1912): The genusAmelanchier in eastern North America.Rhodora 14: 117–161.