Anthropometric study using three-dimensional pelvic CT scan in sex determination among adult Indonesian population
Tóm tắt
This study aims to determine pelvic anthropometry characteristics and logistic regression formula for adult sex identification obtained from adult three-dimensional pelvic computed tomography images. This study was an observational analytical study with retrospective regression and cross-sectional approach. The population was all patients at Radiology Installation of Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital as referral hospital in East Indonesian region, from September to December 2019 who underwent 3D pelvic CT examination. Then, age distribution and pelvic measurements data were obtained. In this case, statistical analysis was conducted for all the data obtained. A number of 204 samples were included in this study. All radiologic components were also significantly different between sexes (p < 0.05) except for transverse diameter of sacral segment (p = 0.180). Moreover, the conjugate pelvic inlet diameter (CPID), the left innominate height (LIH), and sub pubic angle (SPA) showed significant values for regression formula to determine an adult’s sex using 3D pelvic CT. The calculation result > 0 is a prediction for female while < 0 is a prediction for male. From logistic regression model calculation, a high validity value (91.05%) was found with 100% sensitivity to identify male sex and 81.1% specificity to identify female sex. There were differences on radiometric variable characteristics in pelvic anthropometric study among adult Indonesians at Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya. The estimated values of pelvic measurements using 3D CT images could develop a pelvic model with a regression formula with high accuracy value using CPID, LIH, and SPA values.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Franklin D, Cardini A, Flavel A, Marks MK. Morphometric analysis of pelvic sexual dimorphism in a contemporary Western Australian population. Int J Legal Med. 2014;128(5):861–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-0999-8.
Grivas CR, Komar DA. Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: Implications for forensic anthropology. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53(4):771–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00771.x.
Decker SJ, Davy-Jow SL, Ford JM, Hilbelink DR. Virtual determination of sex: metric and nonmetric traits of the adult pelvis from 3D computed tomography models. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56(5):1107–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01803.x.
Mostafa E, Dessouki SK, Hashish RK, Gad AM, Khafagy AA. Adult sex identification using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) of the pelvis: a study among a sample of the Egyptian population. Arab Journal of Forensic Sciences and Forensic Medicine. 2016. https://doi.org/10.12816/0026460.
Betti L. Sexual dimorphism in the size and shape of the os coxae and the effects of microevolutionary processes. Am J Phys Anthropol 2014;153:167–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22410.
Brůžek J, Santos F, Dutailly B, Murail P, Cunha E. Validation and reliability of the sex estimation of the human os coxae using freely available DSP2 software for bioarchaeology and forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2017;164(2):440–449. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23282.
Gonzalez PN, Bernal V, Perez SI. Geometric morphometric approach to sex estimation of human pelvis. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;189(1–3):68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORSCIINT.2009.04.012.
Best KC, Garvin H, Cabo L. An investigation into the relationship between human cranial and pelvic sexual dimorphism. J Forensic Sci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.13669.
Fischer B, Mitteroecker P. Allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human pelvis. Anat Rec. 2017;300:698–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23549.
Zech WD, Hatch G, Siegenthaler L, Thali MJ, Lösch S. Sex determination from os sacrum by postmortem CT. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;221(1–3):39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.03.022.
Krishan K, Chatterjee PM, Kanchan T, Kaur S, Baryah N, Singh RK. A review of sex estimation techniques during examination of skeletal remains in forensic anthropology casework. Forensic Science International Elsevier Ireland Ltd. 2016;261:165.e1-165.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.007.
Mahfouz M, Badawi A, Merkl B, Fatah EEA, Pritchard E, Kesler K, Moore M, Jantz R, Jantz L. Patella sex determination by 3D statistical shape models and nonlinear classifiers. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;173(2–3):161–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.02.024.
Ma N, Hu X, Tao Z, et al. Application of a three-dimensional virtual model to study the effect of fluoroscopic angle on infra-acetabular corridor parameters and screw insertion rates. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16:574. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02730-w.
Haak D, Page C-E, Deserno TM. A survey of DICOM Viewer Software to integrate clinical research and medical imaging. J Digit Imaging. 2015;29(2):206–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-015-9833-1.
Patriquin ML, Steyn M, Loth SR. Metric analysis of sex differences in South African black and white pelves. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;147(119–27):27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.074.
Steyn M, Iscan MY. Metric sex determination from the pelvis in modern Greeks. Forensic Sci Int 2008;179:86.e1–6. 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.04.022.
Steyn M, Patriquin ML. Osteometric sex determination from the pelvis—does population specificity matter? Forensic Sci Int 2009;191:113.e1–5. 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.07.009.
Wilson LA, MacLeod N, Humphrey LT. Morphometric criteria for sexing juvenile human skeletons using the ilium. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53(2):269–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00656.x.
Rissech C, Garcia M, Malgosa A. Sex and age diagnosis by ischium morphometric analysis. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;135(188–96):28. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0379-0738(03)00215-9.
Murail P, Bruzek J, Houët F, Cunha E. DSP: a tool for probabilistic sex diagnosis using worldwide variability in hip-bone measurements. Bulletins et mémoires de la Societé d’Anthropologie de Paris. 2005;17(3–4):167–76. https://doi.org/10.4000/bmsap.1157.
Kolesova O, Kolesovs A, Vetra J. Age-related trends of lesser pelvic architecture in females and males: a computed tomography pelvimetry study. Anatomy & Cell Biology. 2017;50(4):265. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2017.50.4.265.
Amonoo-Kuofi US. Changes in the lumbosacral angle, sacral inclination and the curvature of the lumbar spine during aging. Cells Tissues Organs. 1992;145(4):373–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000147392.
Abdel Moneim WM, Abdel Hady RH, Abdel Maaboud RM, Fathy HM, Hamed AM. Identification of sex depending on radiological examination of foot and patella. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2008;29(2):136–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0b013e318173f048.
Mostafa E, Gad A, Dessouki S, Hashish R, Khafagy A. Sex determination using three-dimensional computed tomography of pelvis measurements in adult Egyptian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;4(2):1. https://doi.org/10.5455/ejfs.231267.
Patriquin ML, Steyn M, Loth SR. Metric analysis of sex differences in South African black and white pelves. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;147(2–3):119–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.074.
Kolesova O, Vētra J. Sexual dimorphism of pelvic morphology variation in live humans. Papers on Anthropology. 2012;20:209. https://doi.org/10.12697/poa.2011.20.21.
Jordaan HV. The differential development of the hominid pelvis. S Afr Med J. 1976; 50(19):744–8. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/818723.
Leong A. Sexual dimorphism of the pelvic architecture: a struggling response to destructive and parsimonious forces by natural & mate selection. McGill journal of medicine: MJM: an international forum for the advancement of medical sciences by students, 2006;9(1):61–6. https://doi.org/10.26443/mjm.v9i1.602. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19529812. Accessed 21 Jan 2020.
Đurić M, Rakočević Z, Đonić D. The reliability of sex determination of skeletons from forensic context in the Balkans. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;147(2–3):159–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.111.
Igbigbi P, Msamati B. Sex determination from femoral head diameters in black Malawians. East Afr Med J. 2009;77(3). https://doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v77i3.46611.
Klales AR, Ousley SD, Vollner JM. A revised method of sexing the human innominate using Phenice’s nonmetric traits and statistical methods. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012;149(1):104–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22102.
Ruriana I, Setiawati R. Sex identification using adult pelvic 3D CT scan: an anthropometric study. Int J Res Publication. 2021;64(1):143–148. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP1006411120201537.