Animal models for percutaneous absorption

Journal of Applied Toxicology - Tập 35 Số 1 - Trang 1-10 - 2015
Eui Chang Jung1, Howard I. Maïbach2
1Department of Dermatology, 90 Medical Center Way, Surge 110 University of California San Francisco CA 94143-0989 USA
2Department of Dermatology, 90 Medical Center Way, Surge 110 University of California San Francisco CA 94143‐0989 USA

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACT

Animal models are important tools to predict human in vivo percutaneous absorption/penetration. Monkey, pig, rat, rabbit, guinea pig, hairless rodents, such as hairless rat, hairless mouse, hairless guinea pig and hairless dog, are among the most used animals for this purpose. Each animal model has its own advantages and weakness or limitation. To better correlate animal data with human skin absorption, we need to be familiar with each animal model's characteristics as well as experimental method and condition. We reviewed the original papers published after 1993 that described permeability of both animal skin and human skin. It showed that monkey, pig and hairless guinea pig are more predictive of human skin absorption/penetration and common laboratory animals, such as rat, rabbit, guinea pig, generally overestimate human skin absorption/penetration. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/j.tiv.2008.10.008

10.1111/1523-1747.ep12538909

10.1016/j.patbio.2007.09.024

10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.11.008

10.1002/jps.10550

10.1006/rtph.2001.1530

10.1684/ejd.2013.2060

10.1006/taap.1994.1165

10.1111/1523-1747.ep12260677

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2006, Protection for subjects in human research, Final rule. Fed. Regist., 71, 6137

10.1100/2012/543536

10.1016/0041-008X(74)90137-9

10.1080/15569520902950474

10.1016/j.addr.2007.07.004

10.1055/s-2008-1069048

10.1159/000250901

10.1016/S0378-5173(00)00603-7

10.1177/0960327107085826

10.1080/00039896.1971.10665987

10.1007/BF00609617

Netzlaff F, 2006, Comparison of bovine udder skin with human and porcine skin in percutaneous permeation experiments, Altern. Lab. Anim., 34, 499

10.1002/jat.1505

10.1002/jps.10405

10.1159/000135638

OECD.2004.OECD Guideline for The Testing Of Chemicals.Skin Absorption: In Vitro Method. 428.OECD Paris.

Panchagnula R, 1997, Animal models for transdermal drug delivery, Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol., 19, 335

10.1016/j.tiv.2003.08.002

10.1191/0960327104ht471oa

10.1016/0015-6264(81)90358-8

10.1111/j.1365-2133.1984.tb15590.x

10.1016/0272-0590(86)90094-1

10.1080/15287394.2011.534425

10.1093/toxsci/58.1.15

SCCNFP.2006.Basic Criteria for The In Vitro Assessment of Dermal Absorption of Cosmetic Ingredients. Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non‐food Products Intended for Consumers (SCCNFP/0970/06) adopted by the SCCP during the 7th plenary meeting of 28 March 2006.

10.1159/000210952

10.1159/000029812

10.1159/000029928

Sueki H, 2000, Hairless guinea pig skin: anatomical basis for studies of cutaneous biology, Eur. J. Dermatol., 10, 357

Surber C, 1993, In vivo percutaneous absorption of [14C] acitretin in the hairless guinea pig and in the rhesus monkey, Arzneimittelforschung, 43, 1001

10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.05.030

ThongsinthusakT RossJ MeindersD.1993.Guidance for The Preparation of Human Pesticide Exposure Assessment Documents. Report No. HS‐1612. Workers Health & Safety Branch Department of Pesticide Regulation California Environmental Protection Agency Sacramento CA.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.1992.Dermal Exposure Assessment: Principles and Applications. EPA/600/8‐91/011B. U.S. EPA Office of Health and Environmental Assessment Washington DC.

USEPA, 2004, In vitro dermal absorption rate testing of certain chemicals of interest to the occupational safety and health administration; final rule, Fed. Regist., 69, 22402

10.1007/s10047-003-0229-5

10.1111/1523-1747.ep12664543

10.1080/009841096161681

10.1006/taap.1998.8434

10.1007/BF00403844

10.3109/00498259209049904

World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety, 2005, Dermal Absorption. Environmental Health Criteria 235

10.1202/0002-8894(2000)061<0473:DAOPIT>2.0.CO;2