Anatomical position of umbilicus in Latin-American patients

Chirurgia plastica - Tập 42 - Trang 351-358 - 2019
Ricardo Cavalcanti Ribeiro1,2, Renato Saltz1,3,4, Carlos Ramirez5, Luis Fernandez de Cordova1
1Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
2Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery of Casa de Portugal Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
3University of Utah, Salt Lake City, (USA)
4Private Clinic Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, USA
5Plastic Surgery Instituto Carlos Chagas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Tóm tắt

The umbiIicus is a natural scar, and the periumbilical area is characterized by a round or ellipsoid shape with a slight depression of 2.5–3.0 cm in diameter. It represents an essential feature in the overall body contour, and consequently exists as one of the most esthetically recognized landmarks on the abdominal wall. The umbilicus lies along the midline at the level of the intervertebral discs between the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae and is considered the only admissible scar on the human body. Given that the umbilicus aids in defining the median abdominal sulcus, it is considered the greatest esthetic component of the abdomen. Thus, the effect of the umbilicus on the esthetic appearance of the abdomen remains key—its position on the abdominal wall and its shape and depth represent important factors influencing conceptions of beauty and psychological well-being. The aim of this study was to establish a quantitative index by evaluating skeletal landmarks surrounding the anterior wall of abdomen to determine the normal anatomical position of the umbilicus in a sample of Latin-American young women. In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 100 nulliparous Latin-American women, aged 21 to 32 years, were enrolled and examined in the supine position. The mathematical relationship of the umbilicus to various nearby anatomical structures (xiphoid process, pubic symphysis, vulvar commissure, and iliac crests) was determined in order to define its ideal localization. In the majority of patients, we observed a slight lateral deviation of the umbilicus, an average distance measuring 14.55 cm between the xiphoid process and the umbilicus, and an average distance measuring 13.14 cm between the umbilicus and the pubic symphysis, with a ratio of 1.10:1. In patients on whom the umbilicus was located medially, the relationship of the distance between the umbilicus and the anterior superior iliac crest, and the distance between both iliac crests, had a ratio of 0.53:1. Although numerous studies have examined what constitutes the esthetically ideal umbilicus, no publication, up until now, reports mathematical values. Level of Evidence: Level III, risk / prognostic study.

Tài liệu tham khảo

ASAPS Tummy Tuck statistics. Source: The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery accessible at https://surgery.org/sites/default/files/ASAPS-Stats2017.pdf. Acesso em: 12 junho 2018

Baroudi R (1975) Umbilicoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 2:431

Moore K. El abdomen. In: Anatomia con orientacion clinica 3. ed. Ed. Panamericana, p 135–151

Catteau JF (1876) De l’ombilic et de ses modifications dans les cas de distention de l’abdomen. Méd.--Paris, p 6–28

Gal Dini e Lydia Ferreira (2007) Putting the Umbilicus in the Midline. A simple technique to correct umbilicus vertical malposition. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(6):1973–1974

Dubou R, Ousterhout D (1978) Placement of the umbilicus in an abdominoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 61:291–293

Ronald Golcman e Benjamin Golcman (2003) Abdominoplastias com cicatrizes reduzidas. In: Melega. Cirurgia plastica fundamentos e arte III (chapter 43). Editora Guanabara Koogan

Hodgkinson DJ (1983) Umbilicoplasty: conversion of “outie” to “innie”. Aesthet Plast Surg 7:221–222

Skandalakis JE et al (2006) Skandalakis’ Surgical anatomy. Chapter 4. Abdominal Wall and Hernias. The McGraw-Hill, p 109–208

Rosique Marina, et al (2009) Estudo comparativo entre tecnicas de Onfaloplastia. Rev Bras Cir Plast 24(1):47–51