Analyzing competing demands in organizations: a systematic comparison
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Achtenhagen L, Melin L (2003) Managing the homogeneity-heterogeneity duality. In: Pettigrew A, Whittington R, Melin L, Sanchez-Runde CJ, Van den Bosch F, Ruigrok W, Numagami T (eds) Innovative forms of organizing. SAGE, London, pp 301–327
Adler PS, Goldoftas B, Levine DI (1999) Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organ Sci 10(1):43–68
Alonso R, Dessein W, Matouschek N (2008) When does coordination require centralization? Am Econ Rev 98(1):145–179
Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW (2009a) Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ Sci 20(4):696–717
Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW (2009b) Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation. Organ Sci 20(4):696–717
Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW (2010) Managing innovation paradoxes: ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies. Long Range Plan 43(1):104–122
Ashforth BE, Rogers KM, Pratt MG, Pradies C (2014). Ambivalence in organizations: a multilevel approach. Organ Sci 25(5):1453–1478
Bartunek JM (1988) The dynamics of personal and organizational reframing. In: Quinn R, Cameron K (eds) Paradox and transformation: towards a theory of change in organization and management. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp 137–162
Beech N, Burns H, Caestecker LD, MacIntosh R, MacLean D (2004) Paradox as invitation to act in problematic change situations. Human Relations 57(10):1313–1332
Birkinshaw J, Gibson C (2004) Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 45(4):47–55
Bøe-Lillegraven T (2014) Untangling the ambidexterity dilemma through big data analytics. Journal of Organisation Design 3(3):27–37
Boumgarden P, Nickerson J, Zenger TR (2012) Sailing into the wind: exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance. Strateg Manag J 33(6):587–610
Burns T, Stalker GM (1961) The management of innovation. Tavistock, London
Burton RM, Obel B, Håkonsson DD (2015) Organizational design: a step-by-step approach (third ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cameron KS (1986) Effectiveness as paradox: consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Manag Sci 32(5):539–553
Cameron KS, Quinn RE (1988) Organizational paradox and transformation. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA
Carlson EJ, Poole MS, Lambert NJ, Lammers JC (2017) A study of organizational responses to dilemmas in interorganizational emergency management. Commun Res 44(2):287–315
Carroll TN (2012) Designing organizations for exploration and exploitation. J Organ Des 1(2):64–68
Chen MJ (2008) Reconceptualizing the competition–cooperation relationship: a transparadox perspective. J Manag Inq 17(4):288–304
Chen Y (2017) Dynamic ambidexterity: how innovators manage exploration and exploitation. Bus Horiz 60(3):385–394
Clegg S (2002) General introduction. In: Clegg S (ed) Management and organization paradoxes. John Benjamins, Philadelphia, PA, pp 1–10
Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Adm Sci Q 17(1):1–25
Cunha JV, Clegg S, Cunha MP (2002) Management, paradox, and permanent dialectics. In: Clegg S (ed) Management and organization paradoxes. John Benjamins, Philadelphia, PA, pp 11–40
Cunha M, Putnam LL (2017) Paradox theory and the paradox of success. Strategic organization 1-12 (in press)
Cunha MP, Clegg S (2018). Persistence in paradox. In Farjoun M, Smith WK, Langley A & Tsoukas H (Eds.) Perspectives on process organization studies: Dualities, dialectics and paradoxes in organizational life (vol.8). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (in press).
DeFillippi R, Grabher G, Jones C (2007) Introduction to paradoxes of creativity: managerial and organizational challenges in the cultural economy. J Organ Behav 28(5):511–521
Denis JL, Langley A, Rouleau L (2007) Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: rethinking theoretical frames. Hum Relat 60(1):179–215
Eisenhardt KM (2000) Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: the new language of change and pluralism. Acad Manag Rev 25(4):703–705
Eisenhardt KM, Brown SL (1998) Competing on the edge: strategy as structured chaos. Long Range Plan 31(5):786–789
Fairhurst GT, Smith WK, Banghart SG, Lewis MW, Putnam LL, Raisch S, Schad J (2016) Diverging and converging: integrative insights on a paradox meta-perspective. Acad Manag Ann 10(1):173–182
Foss NJ (2003) Selective intervention and internal hybrids: interpreting and learning from the rise and decline of the Oticon spaghetti organization. Organ Sci 14(3):331–349
Gaim M (2017a). On the emergence and management of paradoxical tensions: The case of architectural firms. Eur Manag J 1–22 (in press)
Gaim M (2017b). Paradox as the new normal: essays on framing, managing and sustaining organizational tensions. Dissertation, Umeå University
Gaim M, Wåhlin N (2016) In search of a creative space: a conceptual framework of synthesizing paradoxical tensions. Scand J Manag 32(1):33–44
Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad Manag J 47(2):209–226
Gould RM (1994) Revolution at Oticon A/S: the spaghetti organization. In: Dutta S, Manzoni J-F (eds) Process re-engineering, organizational change and performance improvement. McGraw-Hill, London, pp 1–16
Hargrave TJ, Van de Ven AH (2017) Integrating dialectical and paradox perspectives on managing contradictions in organizations. Organ Stud 38(3–4):319–339
Harvey S (2014) Creative synthesis: exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Acad Manag Rev 39(3):324–343
Janssens M, Steyaert C (1999) The world in two and a third way out? The concept of duality in organization theory and practice. Scand J Manag 15(2):121–139
Jarzabkowski P, Lê JK, Van de Ven AH (2013) Responding to competing strategic demands: how organizing, belonging, and performing paradoxes coevolve. Strateg Organ 11(3):245–280
Jay J (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Acad Manag J 56(1):137
Johansson F (2004) The medici effect. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Kamoche K, Cunha MP (2001) Minimal structures: from jazz improvisation to product innovation. Organ Stud 22(5):733–764
Lewis MW, Kelemen ML (2002) Multiparadigm inquiry: exploring organizational pluralism and paradox. Hum Relat 55(2):251–275
Li PP (2016) Global implications of the indigenous epistemological system from the east: how to apply Yin-Yang balancing to paradox management. Cross Cult Strateg Manag 23(1):42–77
Luscher LS, Lewis MW (2008) Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: working through paradox. Acad Manag J 51(2):221–240
March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 26(3):327–342
Martin, R. (2004). The design of business. Rotman Management, Business Design
Martin R (2007) The opposable mind: how successful leaders win through integrative thinking. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Miles RE, Snow CC (1978) Organizational strategy, structure, and process. McGraw-Hill, New York
O’Reilly C, Tushman M (2013) Organizational ambidexterity: past, present and future. Acad Manag Perspect 27(4):324–338
Pache AC, Santos F (2010) When worlds collide: the internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Acad Manag Rev 35(3):455–476
Poole MS, Van de Ven AH (1989) Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):562–578
Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78
Putnam LL, Fairhurst GT, Banghart S (2016) Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: a constitutive approach. Acad Manag Ann 10(1):65–171
Putnam LL, Myers KK, Gailliard BM (2014) Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations 67(4):413–440
Quinn RE, Cameron KS (1988) Organizational paradox and transformation paradox and transformation. toward a theory of change in organization and management. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp 1–19
Raisch S, Birkinshaw J (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J Manag 34(3):375–409
Schad J, Lewis M, Raisch S, Smith W (2016) Paradoxical research in management science: looking backward to move forward. Acad Manag Ann 10(1):5–64
Smith K, Berg D (1987) Paradoxes of group life. Jossey—Bass, San Francisco
Smith W (2014) Dynamic decision making: a model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Acad Manag J 57(6):1592–1623
Smith W, Gonin M, Besharov M (2013) Managing social- business tensions: a review and research agenda for social enterprise. Bus Ethics Q 23(3):407–442
Smith W, Lewis M (2011) Towards a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Acad Manag Rev 36(2):381–403
Tushman M, O’Reilly C (1996) Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif Manag Rev 38(4):8–20
Tushman M, Smith WK, Wood RC, Westerman G, O'Reilly C (2010) Organizational designs and innovation streams. Ind Corp Chang 19(5):1331–1366