Analysis of recombination QTLs, segregation distortion, and epistasis for fitness in maize multiple populations using ultra-high-density markers
Tóm tắt
Using two nested association mapping populations and high-density markers, some important genomic regions controlling recombination frequency and segregation distortion were detected.
Understanding the maize genomic features would be useful for the study of genetic diversity and evolution and for maize breeding. Here, we used two maize nested association mapping (NAM) populations separately derived in China (CN-NAM) and the US (US-NAM) to explore the maize genomic features. The two populations containing 36 families and about 7000 recombinant inbred lines were evaluated with genotyping-by-sequencing. Through the comparison between the two NAMs, we revealed that segregation distortion is little, whereas epistasis for fitness is present in the two maize NAM populations. When conducting quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping for the total number of recombination events, we detected 14 QTLs controlling recombination. Using high-density markers to identify segregation distortion regions (SDRs), a total of 445 SDRs were detected within the 36 families, among which 15 common SDRs were found in at least ten families. About 80 % of the known maize gametophytic factors (ga) genes controlling segregation distortion were overlapped with highly significant SDRs. In addition, we also found that the regions with high recombination rate and high gene density usually tended to have little segregation distortion. This study will facilitate population genetic studies and gene cloning affecting recombination variation and segregation distortion in maize, which can improve plant breeding progress.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bauer E, Falque M, Walter H, Bauland C, Camisan C, Campo L, Meyer N, Ranc N, Rincent R, Schipprack W, Altmann T, Flament P, Melchinger AE, Menz M, Moreno-Gonzalez J, Ouzunova M, Revilla P, Charcosset A, Martin OC, Schon CC (2013) Intraspecific variation of recombination rate in maize. Genome Biol 14(9):R103
Bomblies K, Lempe J, Epple P, Warthmann N, Lanz C, Dangl JL, Weigel D (2007) Autoimmune response as a mechanism for a Dobzhansky–Muller-type incompatibility syndrome in plants. PLoS Biol 5(9):1962–1972
Broman KW, Wu H, Sen S, Churchill GA (2003) R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics 19(7):889–890
Buckler ES, Gaut BS, McMullen MD (2006) Molecular and functional diversity of maize. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9(2):172–176
Casa AM, Brouwer C, Nagel A, Wang L, Zhang Q, Kresovich S, Wessler SR (2000) The MITE family heartbreaker (Hbr): molecular markers in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(18):10083–10089
Charlesworth B (1990) Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination. Genet Res 55(3):199–221
Chia JM, Song C, Bradbury PJ, Costich D, de Leon N, Doebley J, Elshire RJ, Gaut B, Geller L, Glaubitz JC, Gore M, Guill KE, Holland J, Hufford MB, Lai JS, Li M, Liu X, Lu YL, McCombie R, Nelson R, Poland J, Prasanna BM, Pyhajarvi T, Rong TZ, Sekhon RS, Sun Q, Tenaillon MI, Tian F, Wang J, Xu X, Zhang ZW, Kaeppler SM, Ross-Ibarra J, McMullen MD, Buckler ES, Zhang GY, Xu YB, Ware D (2012) Maize HapMap2 identifies extant variation from a genome in flux. Nat Genet 44(7):803–807
Corbett-Detig RB, Zhou J, Clark AG, Hartl DL, Ayroles JF (2013) Genetic incompatibilities are widespread within species. Nature 504(7478):135–137
de Pardo-manuel villena F, Sapienza C (2001) Recombination is proportional to the number of chromosomes arms in mammals. Mamm Genome 12:318–322
Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K, Buckler ES, Mitchell SE (2011) A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One 6(5):e19379
Esch E, Szymaniak JM, Yates H, Pawlowski WP, Buckler ES (2007) Using crossover breakpoints in recombinant inbred lines to identify quantitative trait loci controlling the global recombination frequency. Genetics 177(3):1851–1858
Falque M, Decousset L, Dervins D, Jacob AM, Joets J, Martinant JP, Raffoux X, Ribiere N, Ridel C, Samson D, Charcosset A, Murigneux A (2005) Linkage mapping of 1454 new maize candidate gene Loci. Genetics 170(4):1957–1966
Farkhari M, Lu YL, Shah T, Zhang SH, Naghavi MR, Rong TZ, Xu YB (2011) Recombination frequency variation in maize as revealed by genomewide single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Plant Breed 130(5):533–539
Felsenstein J (1965) The effect of linkage on directional selection. Genetics 52:349–363
Fu Y, Wen TJ, Ronin YI, Chen HD, Guo L, Mester DI, Yang YJ, Lee M, Korol AB, Ashlock DA, Schnable PS (2006) Genetic dissection of intermated recombinant inbred lines using a new genetic map of maize. Genetics 174(3):1671–1683
Glaubitz JC, Casstevens TM, Lu F, Harriman J, Elshire RJ, Sun Q, Buckler ES (2014) TASSEL-GBS: a high capacity genotyping by sequencing analysis pipeline. PLoS One 9(2):e90346
Hufford MB, Xu X, van Heerwaarden J, Pyhajarvi T, Chia JM, Cartwright RA, Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Guill KE, Kaeppler SM, Lai J, Morrell PL, Shannon LM, Song C, Springer NM, Swanson-Wagner RA, Tiffin P, Wang J, Zhang G, Doebley J, McMullen MD, Ware D, Buckler ES, Yang S, Ross-Ibarra J (2012) Comparative population genomics of maize domestication and improvement. Nat Genet 44:808–811
Jiao Y, Zhao H, Ren L, Song W, Zeng B, Guo J, Wang B, Liu Z, Chen J, Li W, Zhang M, Xie S, Lai J (2012) Genome-wide genetic changes during modern breeding of maize. Nat Genet 44(7):812–815
Kimura M, Maruyama T (1966) The mutational load with epistatic gene interactions in fitness. Genetics 54(6):1337–1351
Kondrashov AS (1988) Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature 336(6198):435–440
Lai JS, Li RQ, Xu X, Jin WW, Xu ML, Zhao HN, Xiang ZK, Song WB, Ying K, Zhang M, Jiao YP, Ni PX, Zhang JG, Li D, Guo XS, Ye KX, Jian M, Wang B, Zheng HS, Liang HQ, Zhang XQ, Wang SC, Chen SJ, Li JS, Fu Y, Springer NM, Yang HM, Wang JA, Dai JR, Schnable PS, Wang J (2010) Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation among elite maize inbred lines. Nat Genet 42(11):1027–1030
Li Y, Wang TY (2010) Germplasm base of maize breeding in China and formation of foundation parents. J Maize Sci 18(5):1–8
Li J, Hsia AP, Schnable PS (2007a) Recent advances in plant recombination. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10(2):131–135
Li J, Harper LC, Golubovskaya I, Wang CR, Weber D, Meeley RB, McElver J, Bowen B, Cande WZ, Schnable PS (2007b) Functional analysis of maize RAD51 in meiosis and double-strand break repair. Genetics 176:1469–1482
Li L, Li Q, Wang LB, Zhang ZX, Li JS, Yan JB (2009) Genetic analysis of QTL affecting recombination frequency in whole genome of maize and rice. Sci Agric Sin 42:2262–2270
Li CH, Li YX, Sun BC, Peng B, Liu C, Liu ZZ, Yang ZZ, Li QC, Tan WW, Zhang Y, Wang D, Shi YS, Song YC, Wang TY, Li Y (2013) Quantitative trait loci mapping for yield components and kernel-related traits in multiple connected RIL populations in maize. Euphytica 193(3):303–316
Li CH, Li YX, Bradbury PJ, Wu X, Shi YS, Song YC, Zhang DF, Rodgers-Melnick E, Buckler ES, Zhang ZW, Li Y, Wang TY (2015) Construction of high-quality recombination maps with low-coverage genomic sequencing for joint linkage analysis in maize. BMC Biol 13:78
Liu JJ, Qu LJ (2008) Meiotic and mitotic cell cycle mutants involved in gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant 1(4):564–574
Lu H, Romero-Severson J, Bernardo R (2002) Chromosomal regions associated with segregation distortion in maize. Theor Appl Genet 105(4):622–628
Mallet J (2001) Epistasis and the evolutionary process. Science 291(5504):602
Malmberg RL, Held S, Waits A, Mauricio R (2005) Epistasis for fitness-related quantitative traits in arabidopsis thaliana grown in the field and in the greenhouse. Genetics 171(4):2013–2027
Mangelsdorf PC, Jones DF (1926) The expression of mendelian factors in the gametophyte of maize. Genetics 11(5):423–455
Matsushita S, Iseki T, Fukuta Y, Araki E, Kobayashi S, Osaki M, Yamagishi M (2003) Characterization of segregation distortion on chromosome 3 induced in wide hybridization between indica and japonica type rice varieties. Euphytica 134(1):27–32
McMullen MD, Kresovich S, Villeda HS, Bradbury P, Li H, Sun Q, Flint-Garcia S, Thornsberry J, Acharya C, Bottoms C, Brown P, Browne C, Eller M, Guill K, Harjes C, Kroon D, Lepak N, Mitchell SE, Peterson B, Pressoir G, Romero S, Oropeza Rosas M, Salvo S, Yates H, Hanson M, Jones E, Smith S, Glaubitz JC, Goodman M, Ware D, Holland JB, Buckler ES (2009) Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population. Science 325(5941):737–740
Mei HW, Li ZK, Shu QY, Guo LB, Wang YP, Yu XQ, Ying CS, Luo LJ (2005) Gene actions of QTLs affecting several agronomic traits resolved in a recombinant inbred rice population and two backcross populations. Theor Appl Genet 110(4):649–659
Nass H, Crane P (1970) Effect of endosperm mutants on germination and early seedling growth rate in maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci 10(2):139–140
Otto SP, Feldman MW (1997) Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination. Theor Popul Biol 51(2):134–147
Pan QC, Ali F, Yang XH, Li JS, Yan JB (2012) Exploring the genetic characteristics of two recombinant inbred line populations via high-density SNP markers in maize. PLoS One 7(12):e52777
Pawlowski WP, Golubovskaya IN, Cande WZ (2003) Altered nuclear distribution of recombination protein RAD51 in maize mutants suggests the involvement of RAD51 in meiotic homology recognition. Plant Cell 15:1807–1816
Pawlowski WP, Golubovskaya IN, Timofejeva L, Meeley RB, Sheridan WF, Cande WZ (2004) Coordination of meiotic recombination, pairing, and synapsis by PHS1. Science 303:89–92
Payseur BA, Hoekstra HE (2005) Signatures of reproductive isolation in patterns of single nucleotide diversity across inbred strains of mice. Genetics 171(4):1905–1916
Phillips PC (2008) Epistasis–the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nat Rev Genet 9(11):855–867
Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PI, Daly MJ, Sham PC (2007) PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81(3):559–575
SariGorla M, Ferrario S, Villa M, Pe ME (1996) gaMS-1: a gametophytic male sterile mutant in maize. Sex Plant Reprod 9(4):216–220
Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS et al (2009) The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326(5956):1112–1115
Sharopova N, McMullen MD, Schultz L, Schroeder S, Sanchez-Villeda H, Gardiner J, Bergstrom D, Houchins K, Melia-Hancock S, Musket T, Duru N, Polacco M, Edwards K, Ruff T, Register JC, Brouwer C, Thompson R, Velasco R, Chin E, Lee M, Woodman-Clikeman W, Long MJ, Liscum E, Cone K, Davis G, Coe EH Jr (2002) Development and mapping of SSR markers for maize. Plant Mol Biol 48(5–6):463–481
Taylor DR, Ingvarsson PK (2003) Common features of segregation distortion in plants and animals. Genetica 117(1):27–35
Tulsieram LCW, Morris R, Thomas-Compton M, Eskridge K (1992) Analysis of genetic recombination in maize populations using molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 84(1):65–72
Wade MJ, Winther RG, Agrawal AF, Goodnight CJ (2001) Alternative definitions of epistasis: dependence and interaction. Trends Ecol Evol 16(9):498–504
Wang J LH, Zhang L, Li C, Meng L (2012) QTL ICIMapping software. Isbreeding, Beijing. http://www.isbreeding.net. Accessed 1 July 2016
Xie WB, Feng Q, Yu HH, Huang XH, Zhao Q, Xing YZ, Yu SB, Han B, Zhang QF (2010) Parent-independent genotyping for constructing an ultrahigh-density linkage map based on population sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(23):10578–10583
Yu J, Holland JB, McMullen MD, Buckler ES (2008) Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics 178(1):539–551