An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research

Journal of Research in Nursing - Tập 25 Số 5 - Trang 443-455 - 2020
Louise Doyle1, Catherine McCabe2, Brian Keogh3, Anne‐Marie Brady4, Margaret McCann5
1Associate Professor in Mental Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
2Associate Professor in General Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
3Assistant Professor in Mental Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
4Chair of Nursing and Chronic Illness, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
5Assistant Professor in General Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland

Tóm tắt

Background Qualitative descriptive designs are common in nursing and healthcare research due to their inherent simplicity, flexibility and utility in diverse healthcare contexts. However, the application of descriptive research is sometimes critiqued in terms of scientific rigor. Inconsistency in decision making within the research process coupled with a lack of transparency has created issues of credibility for this type of approach. It can be difficult to clearly differentiate what constitutes a descriptive research design from the range of other methodologies at the disposal of qualitative researchers. Aims This paper provides an overview of qualitative descriptive research, orientates to the underlying philosophical perspectives and key characteristics that define this approach and identifies the implications for healthcare practice and policy. Methods and results Using real-world examples from healthcare research, the paper provides insight to the practical application of descriptive research at all stages of the design process and identifies the critical elements that should be explicit when applying this approach. Conclusions By adding to the existing knowledge base, this paper enhances the information available to researchers who wish to use the qualitative descriptive approach, influencing the standard of how this approach is employed in healthcare research.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/bjhp.12126

10.1177/2333393617742282

10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

10.1177/160940690300200201

Chafe R, 2017, Healthcare Policy, 12, 12

10.1177/1744987116674257

Finch H, Qualitative Research Practice. A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, 211

Fusch PI, 2015, The Qualitative Report, 20, 1408

10.1177/1525822X05279903

Hallberg L, 2013, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Health and Well-being, 8, 1, 10.3402/qhw.v8i0.21755

10.1111/jan.12623

Hooley T, 2011, What is Online research? Using the Internet for Social Science Research

Howitt D, 2019, Introduction to Qualitative Methods in Psychology: Putting Theory into Practice, 4

Janghorban R, 2014, International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Wellbeing, 9

10.1177/160940691401300119

10.1002/nur.21768

10.4135/9781526435620.n24

Krueger RA, 2009, Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 4

Lambert VA, 2012, Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16, 255

10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Lincoln YS, 2017, The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5

10.1186/s12916-018-1087-6

10.1177/1049732315617444

10.1186/1471-2288-9-52

Newell R, 2011, Research for Evidence Based Practice

10.1177/1468794112446106

Ormston R, 2014, Qualitative Research Practice. A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, 1

10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

10.1016/j.pedn.2015.10.022

Ritchie J, 2014, Qualitative Research Practice. A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, 111

10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G

10.1002/nur.20362

10.1177/1049732303253488

10.15171/ijhpm.2017.142

10.1136/bmjspcare-2013-000487

10.1111/jan.13005

10.1177/1558689806292430

10.1111/nhs.12048

10.1111/jan.12748

10.1177/0193945916645499