An integrated approach for knowledge extraction and analysis in collaborative knowledge construction
Tóm tắt
Collaborative knowledge construction (CKC) involved students’ sharing of information, improvement of ideas, and construction of collective knowledge. In this process, knowledge extraction and analysis can provide valuable insights into students’ knowledge capacities, depths, and levels in order to improve the CKC quality. However, existing studies tended to extract and analyze knowledge from a single perspective (e.g., the number of certain knowledge types and knowledge structures), which failed to demonstrate the complexity and dynamics of knowledge construction and advancement. To fill this gap, this research designed a series of computer-supported collaborative concept mapping (CSCCM) activities to facilitate students’ CKC process and then used an integrated approach (i.e., semantic knowledge analysis combined with learning analytics) to extract, analyze, and understand students’ knowledge characteristics and evolutionary trends. Results demonstrated that compared to the low-performing pairs, the high-performing pairs mainly discussed knowledge related to the course content, and their knowledge evolution trend was relatively stable. Based on the results, this research provided analytical implications to extract, analyze, and understand students’ knowledge and pedagogical implications to promote students’ knowledge construction and advancement.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aghabozorgi, S., SeyedShirkhorshidi, A., & Ying Wah, T. (2015). Time-series clustering—A decade review. Information Systems, 53, 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2015.04.007
Al-Zahrani, A. M. (2015). From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students’ creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1133–1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12353
Anderson, R. E. (2008). Implications of the information and knowledge society for education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 5–22). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_1
Ashwin, P. (2014). Knowledge, curriculum and student understanding in higher education. Higher Education, 67(2), 123–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9715-3
Blooma, M. J., Kurian, J. C., Chua, A. Y. K., Goh, D. H. L., & Lien, N. H. (2013). Social question answering: Analyzing knowledge, cognitive processes and social dimensions of micro-collaborations. Computers & Education, 69, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.006
Bloomfield, L. (1926). A set of postulates for the science of language. Language, 2(3), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.2307/408741
Chang, C.-C., Liu, G.-Y., Chen, K.-J., Huang, C.-H., Lai, Y.-M., & Yeh, T.-K. (2017). The effects of a collaborative computer-based concept mapping strategy on geographic science performance in junior high school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5049–5060. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00981a
Charlton, P., & Avramides, K. (2016). Knowledge construction in computer science and engineering when learning through making. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(4), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2016.2627567
Chen, M., & Dong, Y. (2022). Design of exercise grading system based on text similarity computing. Mobile Information Systems, 2022, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4634903
Chiou, C. (2008). The effect of concept mapping on students’ learning achievements and interests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(4), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290802377240
Chu, H.-C., Wang, C.-C., & Wang, L. (2019). Impacts of concept map-based collaborative mobile gaming on English grammar learning performance and behaviors. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(2), 86–100. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26819619
Daft, R. L., & Lewin, A. Y. (1993). Where are the theories for the “New” organizational forms? An editorial essay. Organization Science, 4(4), i–vi. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2635077
de Carvalho, W. F., & Zárate, L. E. (2020). A new local causal learning algorithm applied in learning analytics. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-04-2020-0046
Drieger, P. (2013). Semantic network analysis as a method for visual text analytics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 79, 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.05.053
Durst, S., & Zieba, M. (2018). Mapping knowledge risks: Towards a better understanding of knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice., 17(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2018.1538603
Farrokhnia, M., Pijeira-Díaz, H. J., Noroozi, O., & Hatami, J. (2019). Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: The effects of different instructional designs on conceptual understanding and knowledge co-construction. Computers & Education, 142, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103640
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00829.x
Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00005-6
Golding, C. (2011). Educating for critical thinking: Thought-encouraging questions in a community of inquiry. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.499144
Greene, J. A., & Azeved, R. (2010). The measurement of learners’ self-regulated cognitive and metacognitive processes while using computer-based learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515935
Gurcan, F., & Cagiltay, N. E. (2019). Big data software engineering: Analysis of knowledge domains and skill sets using LDA-based topic modeling. IEEE Access, 7, 82541–82552. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924075
Han, Z. M., Huang, C. Q., Yu, J. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2021). Identifying patterns of epistemic emotions with respect to interactions in massive online open courses using deep learning and social network analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106843
Hoppe, H. U., Doberstein, D., & Hecking, T. (2021). Using sequence analysis to determine the well-functioning of small groups in large online courses. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31(4), 680–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00229-9
Hou, H.-T., & Wu, S.-Y. (2011). Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1459–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.012
Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, S.-C. (2021). Facilitating knowledge construction in mobile learning contexts: A bi-directional peer-assessment approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13001
Ifenthaler, D., Masduki, I., & Seel, N. M. (2011). The mystery of cognitive structure and how we can detect it: Tracking the development of cognitive structures over time. Instructional Science, 39(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9097-6
Jelodar, H., Wang, Y., Yuan, C., Feng, X., Jiang, X., Li, Y., & Zhao, L. (2019). Latent dirichlet allocation (LDA) and topic modeling: Models, applications, a survey. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(11), 15169–15211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6894-4
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613
Karlovčec, M., Córdova-Sánchez, M., & Pardos, Z. A. (2012). Knowledge component suggestion for untagged content in an intelligent tutoring system. In S. A. Cerri, W. J. Clancey, G. Papadourakis, & K. Panourgia (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 195–200). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30950-2_25
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Lehmann, T., Hähnlein, I., & Ifenthaler, D. (2014). Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.051
Lin, P.-C., Hou, H.-T., Wang, S.-M., & Chang, K.-E. (2013). Analyzing knowledge dimensions and cognitive process of a project-based online discussion instructional activity using Facebook in an adult and continuing education course. Computers & Education, 60(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.017
Liu, M., Rus, V., & Liu, L. (2018). Automatic Chinese multiple choice question generation using mixed similarity strategy. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2679009
Liu, S., Kang, L., Liu, Z., Fang, J., Yang, Z., Sun, J., Wang, M., & Hu, M. (2021). Computer-supported collaborative concept mapping: The impact of students’ perceptions of collaboration on their knowledge understanding and behavioral patterns. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1927115
Liu, Y., & Chen, M. (2023). The knowledge structure and development trend in artificial intelligence based on latent feature topic model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3232178
Liu, Z., Mu, R., Yang, Z., Peng, X., Liu, S., & Chen, J. (2022). Modeling temporal cognitive topic to uncover learners’ concerns under different cognitive engagement patterns. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2063904
Lupyan, G., & Lewis, M. (2019). From words-as-mappings to words-as-cues: The role of language in semantic knowledge. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1319–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1404114
Mayordomo, R. M., & Onrubia, J. (2015). Work coordination and collaborative knowledge construction in a small group collaborative virtual task. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.003
Niu, Y., Xie, R., Liu, Z., & Sun, M. (2017). Improved word representation learning with sememes. In R. Barzilay, & M. Kan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 2049–2058). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-1187
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6
Novak, J. D., Bob Gowin, D., & Johansen, G. T. (1983). The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education, 67(5), 625–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670511
Ouyang, F., Chen, Z., Cheng, M., Tang, Z., & Su, C.-Y. (2021). Exploring the effect of three scaffoldings on the collaborative problem-solving processes in China’s higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00273-y
Ouyang, F., Wu, M., Zhang, L., Xu, W., Zheng, L., & Cukurova, M. (2023). Making strides towards AI-supported regulation of learning in collaborative knowledge construction. Computers in Human Behavior, 142, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107650
Patikorn, T., Deisadze, D., Grande, L., Yu, Z., & Heffernan, N. (2019). Generalizability of methods for imputing mathematical skills needed to solve problems from texts. In S. Isotani, E. Millán, A. Ogan, P. Hastings, B. McLaren, & R. Luckin (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 396–405). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_33
Pazzani, M. J. (2000). Knowledge discovery from data? IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 15(2), 10–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/5254.850821
Peng, X., & Xu, Q. (2020). Investigating learners’ behaviors and discourse content in MOOC course reviews. Computers & Education, 143, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103673
Pfiffner, N. (2021). Identifying patterns in communication science: Mapping knowledge structures using semantic network analysis of keywords. In E. Segev (Ed.), Semantic Network Analysis in Social Sciences (pp. 192–215). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120100-11
Phillips, M., Kovanović, V., Mitchell, I., & Gašević, D. (2019). The influence of discipline on teachers’ knowledge and decision making. In B. Eagan, M. Misfeldt, & A. Siebert-Evenstone (Eds.), Advances in Quantitative Ethnography (pp. 177–188). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33232-7_15
Shen, J. T., Yamashita, M., Prihar, E., Heffernan, N., Wu, X., McGrew, S., & Lee, D. (2021). Classifying math knowledge components via task-adaptive pre-trained BERT. In I. Roll, D. McNamara, S. Sosnovsky, R. Luckin, & V. Dimitrova (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 408–419). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78292-4_33
Simonsmeier, B. A., Flaig, M., Deiglmayr, A., Schalk, L., & Schneider, M. (2022). Domain-specific prior knowledge and learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 57(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1939700
Sun, D., Ouyang, F., Li, Y., & Zhu, C. (2021). Comparing learners’ knowledge, behaviors, and attitudes between two instructional modes of computer programming in secondary education. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00311-1
Sundararajan, N., Adesope, O., & Cavagnetto, A. (2018). The process of collaborative concept mapping in kindergarten and the effect on critical thinking skills. Journal of STEM Education, 19(1). 5–13. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/182981/
Välimaa, J., & Hoffman, D. (2008). Knowledge society discourse and higher education. Higher Education, 56(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9123-7
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
de Weerd, J., Tan, E., & Stoyanov, S. (2017). Fostering interdisciplinary knowledge construction in computer-assisted collaborative concept mapping. In É. Lavoué, H. Drachsler, K. Verbert, J. Broisin, & M. Pérez-Sanagustín (Eds.), Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education (pp. 391–396). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66610-5_32
Wen, Z., Gui, L., Wang, Q., Guo, M., Yu, X., Du, J., & Xu, R. (2022). Sememe knowledge and auxiliary information enhanced approach for sarcasm detection. Information Processing & Management, 59(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102883
Wu, D., Yang, R., & Shen, C. (2021). Sentiment word co-occurrence and knowledge pair feature extraction based LDA short text clustering algorithm. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 56, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-020-00597-7
Ye, Y., Qi, F., Liu, Z., & Sun, M. (2022). Going “deeper”: Structured sememe prediction via transformer with tree attention. In S. Muresan, P. Nakov, & A. Villavicencio (Eds.), Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022 (pp. 128–138). Retrieved from https://aclanthology.org/2022.findings-acl.12
Yeari, M., & van den Broek, P. (2016). A computational modeling of semantic knowledge in reading comprehension: Integrating the landscape model with latent semantic analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 880–896. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0749-6
Yoon, M., Lee, J., & Jo, I.-H. (2021). Video learning analytics: Investigating behavioral patterns and learner clusters in video-based online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 50, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100806
Zabolotna, K., Malmberg, J., & Järvenoja, H. (2023). Examining the interplay of knowledge construction and group-level regulation in a computer-supported collaborative learning physics task. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107494
Zhang, S., Liu, Q., & Cai, Z. (2019). Exploring primary school teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in online collaborative discourse: An epistemic network analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3437–3455. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12751
Zhao, J., Bai, T., Wei, Y., & Wu, B. (2022). PoetryBERT: Pre-training with sememe knowledge for classical Chinese poetry. In Y. Tan & Y. Shi (Eds.), Data Mining and Big Data (pp. 369–384). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8991-9_26