An evolving framework for describing student engagement in classroom activities
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ames, 1992, Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261, 10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
Azevedo, F. S. (1998). Inventing Mapping: Meta-representational competence for spatially distributed data. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Azevedo, 2000, Designing representations of terrain: A study in meta-representational competence, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 443, 10.1016/S0732-3123(01)00053-0
Azevedo, 2006, Personal excursions: Investigating the dynamics of student engagement, International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11, 57, 10.1007/s10758-006-0007-6
Ball, 2000, Making believe: The collective construction of public mathematical knowledge in the elementary classroom, 193
Blumenfeld, 2006, Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments, 475
Blumenfeld, 1991, Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning, Educational Psychologist, 26, 369, 10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
Brown, 1996, Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles and systems, 289
Cobb, 2001, Participating in classroom mathematical practices, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 113, 10.1207/S15327809JLS10-1-2_6
Collins, 1995, Design issues for learning environments, 347
Csikszentmihalyi, 1988, The flow experience and its significance for human psychology, 15
Csikszentmihalyi, 1990
diSessa, 2002, Students’ criteria for representational adequacy, 105
diSessa, 1999, Meta-representation: Native competence and targets for instruction
diSessa, 1991, Inventing Graphing: Meta-representational expertise in children, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117
diSessa, 1998, Cultivating conceptual change with benchmark lessons, 155
diSessa, 2000, Meta-representation: An introduction, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 385, 10.1016/S0732-3123(01)00051-7
Dweck, 1999
Edelson, 2004, The interest-driven learning design framework: Motivating learning through usefulness, 166
Engeström, 1999, Activity theory and individual and social transformation, 19
Engle, 2002, Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom, Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399, 10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
Friedman, 1999, What students should know about technology: The case of scientific visualization, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 10.1023/A:1009404212653
Granados, 2000, Constructing intersubjectivity in representational design activities, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 503, 10.1016/S0732-3123(01)00055-4
Greeno, 1997, Practicing representation: Learning with and about representational forms, Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 361
Greeno, 1998, The situativity of knowing, learning, and research, American Psychologist, 53, 5, 10.1037/0003-066X.53.1.5
Gresalfi, 2009, Taking up opportunities to learn: Constructing dispositions in mathematics classrooms, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 327, 10.1080/10508400903013470
Hall, 1995, Making space: A comparison of mathematical work in school and professional design practice, 118
Hidi, 2000, Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century, Review of Educational Research, 70, 151, 10.3102/00346543070002151
Hidi, 2006, The four-phase model of interest development, Educational Psychologist, 4, 111, 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
Hoffmann, 2002, Promoting girls’ interest and achievement in physics classes for beginners, Learning and Instruction, 12, 447, 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00010-X
Janvier, 1987
Latour, 1986
Lepper, 1992, A desire to be taught: Instructional consequences of intrinsic motivation, Motivation and Emotion, 16, 187, 10.1007/BF00991651
Madanes, R. (1997). Teaching through discussion: Using critical moves and support moves. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Maher, 2009
Maher, 2009, Representations as tools for building arguments
Meira, 1995, The microevolution of mathematical representations in children's activities, Cognition and Instruction, 13, 269, 10.1207/s1532690xci1302_5
Minstrell, 1989, Teaching science for understanding, 129
Newman, 1992, The significance and sources of student engagement, 11
Puntambekar, 2005, Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science through design, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 185, 10.1002/tea.20048
Renninger, 2004, The centrality of culture and community to participant learning at and with the Math Forum, 181
Resnick, 1996, Toward a practice of constructional design, 161
Rigby, 1992, Beyond the intrinsic–extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning, Motivation and Emotion, 16, 165, 10.1007/BF00991650
Schoenfeld, 1989, Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behavior, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 338, 10.2307/749440
Sherin, B. (1997). The elements of representational design. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Educational Research, Chicago, IL.
Sherin, 2000, How students invent representations of motion: A genetic account, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 399, 10.1016/S0732-3123(01)00052-9
Sherin, 2005, Exploration zones: A framework for describing the emergent structure of learning activities, 329
Speiser, 2009, Representing motion: An experiment in learning, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 1, 10.1016/S0732-3123(03)00002-6
Stein, 2008, Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 313, 10.1080/10986060802229675
Tufte, 1990
Willats, 1985, Drawing systems revisited: The role of denotation systems in children's figure drawings, 374
Willats, 1997
Yackel, 1996, Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in Mathematics, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458, 10.2307/749877
Yankelewitz, 2010, A task that elicits reasoning: A dual analysis, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29, 76, 10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.02.002