An application of the time- and magnitude-predictable model to long-term earthquake prediction in eastern Anatolia

Nilgün Sayil1
1Department of Geophysics, Engineering Faculty, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey

Tóm tắt

In order to estimate the recurrence intervals for large earthquakes occurring in eastern Anatolia, this region enclosed within the coordinates of 36∘–42∘N, 35∘–45∘E has been separated into nine seismogenic sources on the basis of certain seismological and geomorphological criteria, and a regional time- and magnitude-predictable model has been applied for these sources. This model implies that the magnitude of the preceding main shock which is the largest earthquake during a seismic excitation in a seismogenic source governs the time of occurrence and the magnitude of the expected main shock in this source. The data belonging to both the instrumental period (M S ≥ 5.5) until 2003 and the historical period (I 0≥ 9.0 corresponding to M S ≥ 7.0) before 1900 have been used in the analysis. The interevent time between successive main shocks with magnitude equal to or larger than a certain minimum magnitude threshold were considered in each of the nine source regions within the study area. These interevent times as well as the magnitudes of the main shocks have been used to determine the following relations: $$\log T_t= 0.11M_{\min} - 0.12M_p - 0.11\log M_0 + 2.51$$ $$M_f= 0.89M_{\min} - 0.24M_p + 0.31\log M_0 - 4.99$$ fwawhere T t is the interevent time measured in years, M min is the surface wave magnitude of the smallest main shock considered, M p is the magnitude of the preceding main shock, M f is magnitude of the following main shock, and M 0 is the released seismic moment per year in each source. Multiple correlation coefficient and standard deviation have been computed as 0.50 and 0.28, respectively for the first relation. The corresponding values for the second relation are 0.64 and 0.32, respectively. It was found that the magnitude of the following main shock M f does not depend on the preceding interevent time T t . This case is an interesting property for earthquake prediction since it provides the ability to predict the time of occurrence of the next strong earthquake. On the other hand, a strong negative dependence of M f on M p was found. This result indicates that a large main shock is followed by a smaller magnitude one and vice versa. On the basis of the first one of the relations above and taking into account the occurrence time and magnitude of the last main shock, the probabilities of occurrence P(Δ t) of main shocks in each seismogenic source of the east Anatolia during the next 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 years for earthquakes with magnitudes equal 6.0 and 7.0 were determined. The second of these relations has been used to estimate the magnitude of the expected main shock. According to the time- and magnitude-predictable model, it is expected that a strong and a large earthquake can occur in seismogenic Source 2 (Erzincan) with the highest probabilities of P 10 = 66% (M f = 6.9 and T t = 12 years) and P 10 = 44% (M f = 7.3 and T t = 24 years) during the future decade, respectively.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Acharya, H.K., 1979, A method to determine the duration of quisence in a seismic gap, Geophys. Res. Letters 6, 681–684. Alsan, E., Tezuçan, L. and Bath, M., 1975, An earthquake catalogue for Turkey for the interval 1913–1970, Report Kandilli Obs., Istanbul and Uppsala Univ., Sweden. Ambraseys, N.N. and Jackson, J.A., 1981, Earthquake hazard and vulnerability in the northeastern mediterranean, the Corinth earthquake sequence of February–March 1981, Disaster 5, 355–368. Ayhan, E., Alsan, E., Sancaklı, N. and Üçer, S.B., 1987, An Earthquake Catalogue of Turkey and Surrounding Area (1881–1980), Bogazici University, Istanbul. Bufe, C.G., Harsh, P.W. and Burford, R.O., 1977, Steady-state seismic slip: A precise recurrence model, Geophys. Res. Letters 4, 91–94. Dewey, J.F., 1976, Seismicity of North Anatolia, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 66, 843–868. Ergin, K., 1967, An Earthquake Catalogue of Turkey and Surrounding Area (from A.D. 11 to close of 1964), Istanbul Tech. Univ. Mining Faculty, Istanbul. Ekström, G. and Dziewonski, A., 1988, Evidence of bias in estimations of earthquake size, Nature 332, 319–323. Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C.F., 1944, Frequency of eathquakes in California, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 34, 185–188. Gündogdu, O. and Altınok, Y., 1986, An Earthquake Data Set of Turkey and Surrounding Area 1900–1986, Istanbul Univ., Engineering Faculty, Dept. of Geophys., Istanbul. Jackson, J. and McKenzie, D., 1988, The relationship between plate motion and seismic moment tensors, and the rate of active deformation in the Mediterranean and Middle East, Geophys. J. 93, 45–73. Kanamori, H., 1977, The energy released in Great Earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 2981–2987. Karakaisis, G.F., Kourouzidis, M.C. and Papazachos, B.C., 1991, Behaviour of seismic activity during a single seismic cycle, Int. Conf. Earthq. Pred. Strasbourg, 15–18 October 1991, 1, 47–54. Karakaisis, G.F., 1994a, Long-term earthquake prediction along the north and east anatolian fault zones based on the time and magnitude predictable model, Geophys. J. Int. 116, 198–204. Karakaisis, G.F., 2000, Effects of zonation on the results of the application of the regional time predictable seismicity model in greece and japan, Earth Planets Space 52, 221–228. Karnik, V., 1968, Seismicity of the European Area, D. Reidel Publ. Com., Dordreed, Holland. Kenar, Ö., Osmansahin, İ. and Özer, M.F., 1996, Seismicity and tectonics of Eastern Anatolia, Bull. IISEE 30, 59–76. Ketin, İ., 1977, General Geology, 1, İ.T.Ü. Faculty of Mining Publication, İstanbul. McGuire, R.K., 1976, Fortran Computer Program for Seismic Risk Analysis, USGS open File Report, 76–67. McKenzie, D., 1972, Active tectonics of the mediterranean region, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 30, 109–185. Molnar, P., 1979, Earthquake recurrence intervals and plate tectonics, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 69, 115–133. Osmansahin, İ., Ekşi, F. and Alptekin, Ö., 1986, Seismicity and active tectonics of Eastern Anatolia, Bull. Earthquake Res Ints. of Türkiye 52, 5–41. Öcal, N., 1968, Seismicity and Earthquake Geography of Turkey (Earthquake Catalogue of Turkey for 1950–1960), Kandilli Observatory, Seismology Publications, Istanbul. Panagiotopoulos, D.G., 1995, Long term earthquake prediction in central America and Caribbean Sea based on the time and magnitude predictable model, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 1190–1201. Papazachos, B.C. and Comminakis, P.E., 1982, A catalogue of earthquake in Greece and Surrounding Area for The Period 1901–1980, Univ. Of Thessaloniki, Geophys. Lab., 5, Greece. Papazachos, B.C., 1989, A time-predictable model for earthquake generation in Greece, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 79, 77–84. Papazachos, B.C., 1990, Seismicity of the aegean and surrounding area, Tectonophys 178, 287–308. Papazachos, B.C. and Papaioannou, Ch.A., 1993, Long-term earthquake prediction in aegean area based on the time and magnitude predictable model, Pure Appl. Geophys. 140, 593–612. Papazachos, B.C., Papadimitriou, E.E., Karakaisis, G.F. and Tsapanos, T.M., 1994a, An application of the time and magnitude predictable model for the long-term prediction of strong shallow earthquakes in the Japan area, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 84, 426–437. Papazachos, B.C., Papadimitriou, E.E. and Karakaisis, G.F., 1994b, Time-dependent seismicity in the zones of the continental fracture system, Proc. of the XXIV Gen. Ass. of ESC, Athens, 1994, p. 11. Papazachos, B.C., Papadimitriou, E.E., Karakaisis, G.F. and Panagiotopoulos, D.G., 1997a, Long-term earthquake prediction in the circum-pasific convergent belt, Pure Appl. Geophys. 149, 173–217. Papazachos, B.C., Karakaisis, G.F., Papadimitriou, E.E. and Papaioannou, Ch.A., 1997b, The Regional time and magnitude predictable model and its application to the alpine-himalayan belt, Tectonophys 271, 295–323. Parsons, T., Toda, S. and Stein, R.S., 2000, Heightened odds of large earthquakes near Istanbul: An interaction-based probability calculation, Science 288, 661–665. Pinar, N. and Lahn, E., 1952, Türkiye Earthquake Catalogue, Ministry of Public Works, 96. Sayil, N. and Osmansahin, İ., 2003, Investigation of Seismicity of the Eastern Anatolia, Kocaeli 2003 Earthquake Symposium, 2003 November, İzmit, Türkiye, 580–589. Shimazaki, K. and Nakata, T., 1980, Time predictable recurrence of great earthquakes, Geophys. Res. Letters 7, 279–282. Soysal, H., Sipahioglu, S., Kolçak, D. and Y. Altınok, 1981, Historical Earthquake Catalogue of Türkiye and Surrounding, Tübitak, TBAG 341, Ankara. Sykes, L.R. and Quittmeyer, R.C., 1981, Repeat times of Great Earthquakes along simple plate boundaries, Maurice Ewing Series 4, 297–332. Stein, R.S., Barka, A.A. and Dietrich, J.H., 1997, Progressive failure on the North Anatolian fault since 1939 by earthquake stress triggering, Geophys. J. Intern. 128, 594–604. Weisberg, S., 1980, Applied Linear Regression, Wiley, New York 1980, p. 283. Wesnousky, S.G., Scholz, K. and Matsuda, T., 1984, Integration of geological and seismological data for analysis of seismic hazard: A case study of Japan, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 74, 687–708.