An ‘academic war’ – A case study of confrontation in academia

Alcaraz-Ariza, 2011, Evaluation in English-medium medical book reviews, IJES, 2, 137, 10.6018/ijes/2011/1/137141 Bakhtin, 1981, The dialogic imagination: Four essays Etaywe, 2017, Pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic study of praise and criticism in academic writing: The case of Arabic academic book reviews, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 4, 87 Halliday, 1985 Hunston, 2005, Conflict and consensus: Construing opposition in applied linguistics, 1 Hutz, 2001, “Insgesamt muss ich leider zu einem ungünstigen Urteil kommen.” Zur Kulturspezifik wissenschaftlicher Rezensionen im Deutschen und Englischen, 109 Hyland, 2004 Hyland, 2005, Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse, Vol. 7, 173 Hyland, 2009 Khosravi, 2017, Reply articles: Where impoliteness and judgment coincide, Journal of Politeness Research, 13, 143, 10.1515/pr-2015-0020 Knapp-Potthoff, 1992, Secondhand politeness, 203 Nayernia, 2019, Attitude markers in book reviews: The case of applied linguistics discourse community, The Linguistics Journal, 13, 126 McElholm, 2002 Pagano, 1994, Negatives in written texts, 250 Pätzold, 1984, Beschreibung und Erwerb von Handlungsmustern. Beispiel: Rezensionen wissenschaftlicher Publikationen, Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR. Reihe A, 138 Perelman, 1969 Tannen, 2002, Agonism in academic discourse, Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1651, 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00079-6 Toulmin, 1958 Tse, 2009, Discipline and gender: Constructing rhetorical identity in book reviews, 105 Vassileva, 2006 Ventola, 1998, Meaningful choices in academic communities. Ideological issues Walton, 1996 Walton, 2008 Wang, 2012, Discursive construction of authorial voice in English book reviews: A contrastive analysis, Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 1 Wiegand, 1983, Nachdenken über wissenschaftliche Rezensionen, Deutsche Sprache, 11, 122 Wills, 1997, Hedges in expert-language reviews, 134 Wunderlich, 1972, Zur Konventionalität von Sprechhandlungen, Linguistische Pragmatik. Frankfurt/M.: Athenäum, 1972, 11 Blommaert, 2000, Critical discourse analysis, Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 447, 10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447 de Beaugrande, 2001, Interpreting the discourse of HG Widdowson: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis, Applied Linguistics, 22, 104, 10.1093/applin/22.1.104 de Beaugrande Fairclough, 1996 Fairclough, 1996, A reply to Henry Widdowson's 'discourse analysis: A critical view', Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 5, 49, 10.1177/096394709600500105 Hauser, 2006, Review of: H. G. Widdowson (2004): Text, context. Pretext. Critical issues in discourse analysis. Oxford, Discourse & Society, 17, 813, 10.1177/0957926506068441 Poole, 2010, Commitment and criticality: Fairclough's critical discourse analysis evaluated, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20, 137, 10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00234.x Tian, 2006, 140 Toolan, 1997, What is critical discourse analysis and why are people saying such terrible things about it?, Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 6, 83, 10.1177/096394709700600201 Widdowson, 1995, Review of Fairclough's discourse and social change, Applied Linguistics, 16, 510, 10.1093/applin/16.4.510 Widdowson, 1995, Discourse analysis: A critical view, Language and Literature, 4, 157, 10.1177/096394709500400301 Widdowson, 1996, Reply to Fairclough: Discourse and interpretation: Conjectures and refutations, Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, 5, 57, 10.1177/096394709600500106 Widdowson, 1998, The theory and practice of critical discourse analysis, Applied Linguistics, 19, 136, 10.1093/applin/19.1.136 Widdowson, 2004