An Examination of Corporate Tax Shelter Participants
Tóm tắt
ABSTRACT: Recent evidence suggests that corporate tax shelters have become important corporate instruments for reducing tax burden. Based on a sample of identified tax shelter participants, I develop a profile of the type of firm that likely engages in tax sheltering. The model detects tax shelter participants through the use of variables predicted to be either affected by or associated with tax sheltering. I find that firms actively engaged in tax sheltering exhibit larger ex post book-tax differences and more aggressive financial reporting practices. Using this model of tax shelter firm characteristics, I identify a broad sample of predicted tax shelter firms from the population of firms. I then examine whether tax sheltering is associated with wealth creation for shareholders or with managerial opportunism. I find that active tax shelter firms with strong corporate governance exhibit positive abnormal returns. This finding is consistent with tax sheltering being a tool for wealth creation in well-governed firms.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bankman, 1999, The new market in corporate tax shelters, Tax Notes, 83, 1775
Basu, 1997, The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24, 2, 10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00014-1
Blouin, J., and I. Tuna. 2007. Tax contingencies: Cushioning the blow to earnings? Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.
Brown, J. 2008. The spread of aggressive corporate tax reporting: A detailed examination of the corporate-owned life insurance shelter. Working paper, Arizona State University.
Browning, L. 2005. Tax-shelter inquiry focuses on restaurant operator. The New York Times (December 14).
Desai, 2003, The divergence between book and tax income, Tax Policy and Economy, 17, 169, 10.1086/tpe.17.20140508
Dharmapala, 2006, Corporate tax avoidance and high powered incentives, Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 145, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.02.002
———, and ———. 2007. Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. Working paper, Harvard University and University of Connecticut.
Drucker, J. 2006. Bermuda Triangle: How Merck saved $1.5 billion paying itself for drug patents: Partnership with British bank moved liabilities offshore; Alarmed U.S. cracks down—“The art of tax avoidance.” Wall Street Journal (September 28): A1.
Dyreng, 2008, Long-run corporate tax avoidance, The Accounting Review, 83, 61, 10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.61
Fama, 1993, Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds, Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3, 10.1016/0304-405X(93)90023-5
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 1975. Accounting for Contingencies. Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 5. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
Frank, 2009, Are financial and tax reporting aggressiveness reflective of broader corporate policies, The Accounting Review, 84, 467, 10.2308/accr.2009.84.2.467
Frischmann, 2008, Economic consequences of increasing the conformity in accounting for uncertain tax benefits, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46, 261, 10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.08.002
Gleason, 2002, Materiality and contingent tax liability reporting, The Accounting Review, 77, 317, 10.2308/accr.2002.77.2.317
Graham, 2006, Tax shelters and corporate debt policy, Journal of Financial Economics, 81, 563, 10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.09.002
Gompers, 2003, Corporation governance and equity prices, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 107, 10.1162/00335530360535162
Hanlon, 2003, What can we infer about a firm's taxable income from its financial statements?, National Tax Journal, 56, 831, 10.17310/ntj.2003.4.07
2005, The persistence and pricing of earnings, accruals, and cash flows when firms have large book-tax differences, The Accounting Review, 80, 137, 10.2308/accr.2005.80.1.137
Laplante, 2005, Evidence on the possible information loss of conforming book income and taxable income, The Journal of Law & Economics, 48, 407, 10.1086/497525
———, and J. Slemrod. 2006. What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax aggressiveness. Working paper, University of Michigan.
———, L. Mills, and J. Slemrod. 2007. An empirical examination of corporate tax noncompliance. In Taxing Corporate Income in the 21st Century, edited by A. Auerbach, J. R. Hines, Jr., and J. Slemrod. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Heltzer, W. 2008. Conservatism and book-tax differences. Working paper, DePaul University.
Jones, 1991, Earnings management during import relief investigations, Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 727
Kothari, 2005, Performance matched unexplained accrual measures, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39, 745, 10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002
Lev, 2004, Taxable income, future earnings, and equity values, The Accounting Review, 79, 1039, 10.2308/accr.2004.79.4.1039
Lisowsky, P. 2008a. “Seeking shelter”: Empirically modeling tax shelters and examining their link to the contingent tax liability reserve. Working paper, University of Illinois.
———. 2008b. Inferring U.S. tax liability from financial statement information. Working paper, University of Illinois.
McGill, 2004, Lost in translation: Detecting tax shelter activity in financial statements, National Tax Journal, 57, 739, 10.17310/ntj.2004.3.13
Mills, 1998, Book-tax differences and internal revenue service adjustments, Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 343, 10.2307/2491481
Erickson, 1998, Investments in tax planning, The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 20, 1
Newberry, 2005, Firms' off-balance sheet and hybrid debt-financing: Evidence from their book-tax reporting differences, Journal of Accounting Research, 43, 251, 10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00170.x
Phillips, 2003, Earnings management: New evidence based on deferred tax expense, The Accounting Review, 78, 491, 10.2308/accr.2003.78.2.491
Plesko, G., 1999. Book-tax differences and the measurement of corporate income. National Tax Association Proceedings 1999: 171–176.
2003, An evaluation of alternative measures of corporate tax rates, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35, 201, 10.1016/S0165-4101(03)00019-3
Shackelford, 2001, Empirical tax research in accounting, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 321, 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00022-2
U.S. Congress, Joint Committee on Taxation. 2003. Report of investigation of Enron Corporation and related entities regarding federal tax and compensation issues, and policy recommendations. Vol. I–III. JCS-3-03. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
Wall Street Journal. 2004. KPMG shelter shaved $1.7 billion off taxes of 29 large companies. (June 16): A1.
———. 2005. Outside audit: KPMG used a shelter it sold to firms—Accounting concern booked a $34 million deduction before IRS banned strategy. (October 14): M1.