Adverse events in five surgical procedures

Emerald - Tập 14 Số 2 - Trang 145-155 - 2009
AshleyKable1, RobertGibberd1, AllanSpigelman2
1Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
2St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales – Surgery, Sydney, Australia

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to measure the adverse event rates for five elective surgical procedures: transurethral resection of prostate, cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, joint arthroplasty, and herniorrhaphy.Design/methodology/approachA retrospective two‐stage medical record review was conducted on 1,177 admissions in 1998 and 2000 at two tertiary hospitals. Records found to be positive for any of 17 screening criteria during the first stage were reviewed by surgeons from the relevant specialty for adverse events associated with the admissions.FindingsThe adverse event (AE) rate overall was 23.1 per cent. There were large variations between the procedural groups, ranging from 12.7 per cent (laparoscopic cholecystectomy) to 44.8 per cent (abdominal hysterectomy). Of the 272 AEs, 89 (32.7 per cent) had an unplanned readmission requiring 709 additional days in hospital and 55 (20.2 per cent) patients had additional surgery (seven returned to theatre during their admission for the procedure). AEs involving a disability that resolved within 12 months occurred for 91.2 per cent, 6.3 per cent had permanent disability, and 2.5 per cent resulted in death. The surgical reviewers determined that 24.7 per cent of the AEs were highly preventable.Originality/valueThe study confirms that surgical admissions have a high risk for AEs. The risk varies between procedural groups and 47.3 per cent are not preventable. Adverse events are an important patient safety issue. Preventing AEs would reduce readmissions, patient discomfort and associated costs. Routine monitoring of AEs is recommended.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bratzler, D. (2006), “The surgical infection prevention and surgical care improvement projects: promises and pitfalls”, The American Surgeon, Vol. 72, pp. 1010‐16.

Kable, A., Gibberd, R. and Spigelman, A. (2002), “Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia”, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 14, pp. 269‐76.

Kable, A., Gibberd, R. and Spigelman, A. (2008), “Predictors of adverse events in surgical admissions in Australia”, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 406‐11.

Rosen, A.K., Geraci, J.M., Ash, A.S., McNiff, K.J. and Moskowitz, M.A. (1992), “Post‐operative adverse events of common surgical procedures in the Medicare population”, Medical Care, Vol. 30, pp. 753‐65.

Sarker, S. (2003), “Courses, cadavers, and counsellors: reducing errors in the operating theatre”, British Medical Journal, Vol. 327, p. 109s.

Vincent, C., Taylor‐Adams, S. and Stanhope, N. (1998), “Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine”, British Medical Journal, Vol. 316, pp. 1154‐7.

Wilson, R.M., Runciman, W.B., Gibberd, R.W., Harrison, B.T., Newby, L. and Hamilton, J.D. (1995), “The Quality in Australian Health Care study”, The Medical Journal of Australia, Vol. 163, pp. 458‐71.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 14 Số 2

145-155

Thông tin tác giả