Adaptation of Indian public sector to market‐based economic reforms

International Journal of Public Sector Management - Tập 22 Số 6 - Trang 516-531 - 2009
AnjulaGurtoo1
1Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

Tóm tắt

PurposeEconomic policy reforms, characterised by a market‐driven, privatised policy regime, are being adopted as a strategy by India to promote economic development. As markets become liberalised, public sector organisations face extreme vulnerability unless they can identify and develop the competencies necessary to thrive in these competitive markets. This paper, drawing on the resource‐based view, aims to identify the pre‐reform capabilities of public sector organisations in India and similar developing country contexts that would be relevant even in the post‐reform context.Design/methodology/approachAn interpretative and theoretical approach is used to put forth the arguments and a framework is proposed to explain the possibility of deriving competitive advantages from pre‐reform capabilities in the post‐reform context.FindingsSeveral unique capabilities of Indian public sector organisations can be identified using the resource based perspective which can be leveraged in the post‐reform context. They have superior resource‐picking capacity compared to private firms, especially for government‐regulated resources, international financial assets and modern technologies. Their internal integrative managerial systems and structures offer them an advantage in meeting the competitive demands of speed and promptness. Under effective leadership, the loyalty of a large workforce and their number of years of experience gives them an advantage of effective coordination and knowledge sharing and flow. Also, their capability in delivering economies of scale and scope due to their size and supply chain integration gives them a cost advantage over others.Practical implicationsThis paper takes a practical approach. It accepts the existing organisational culture, processes and systems of public sector organisations as given and matters of long‐term change, and identifies existing capabilities in the current organisational context that could help them survive better.Originality/valueUnlike most papers that focus on how policy changes affect public sector organisations or those that conduct a comparative analysis with the private sector on various parameters, the main focus of this paper is to identify existing capabilities that can be leveraged by public sector organisations for effective adaptation in the new scenario.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adhikari, R. and Kirkpatrick, C. (1990), “Public enterprises in less developed countries: an empirical review”, in Heath, J.B. (Ed.), Public Enterprises at the Crossroads, Routledge, London, pp. 25‐36.

Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. (1993), “Strategic assets and organizational rent”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, pp. 33‐46.

Anuradha, N.S. and Gurtoo, A. (2007), “Privatizing Aluminum India Limited (AIL): cultural dimensions in management of change”, The Management Case Study Journal, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 52‐73.

Ariyo, A. and Jerome, A. (1999), “Privatization in Africa: an appraisal”, World Development, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 201‐13.

Barney, J.B. (1986), “Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy”, Management Science, Vol. 32 No. 10, pp. 1231‐41.

Barney, J.B. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 99‐120.

Bhaya, H. (1990), “Management efficiency in the private and public sectors in India”, in Heath, J.B. (Ed.), Public Enterprises at the Crossroads, Routledge, London, pp. 228‐40.

Bouin, O. and Michalet, C.A. (1991), Rebalancing the Public and Private Sectors: Developing Country Experience, Organization for Economic Co‐operation and Development, Paris.

Brainard, W.C. (1989), Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: 25th Anniversary Issue, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.

Budd, L. (2007), “Post bureaucracy and reanimating public governance: a discourse and practice of continuity”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 531‐47.

Burton, J., Joubert, C., Harrison, J. and Athayde, C. (1993), Evaluation of ODA Project in Support of Ghana's Civil Service Reform Programme, ODA Evaluation Department, London.

Department of Disinvestment (2007), “Disinvestment of central public sector enterprises”, White Paper, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, New Delhi.

Dey, P.K. (2000), “Managing projects in fast track – a case of pubic sector organization in India”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 13 No. 7, pp. 588‐603.

Dixon, J., Kouzmin, A. and Kakabadse, N.K. (1998), “Managerialism – something old, something borrowed, little new: economic prescription versus effective organizational change in public agencies”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 11 No. 2/3, pp. 164‐87.

Dubash, N.K. and Ranjan, S. (2002), “India: electricity reform under political constraints”, in Dubash, N.K. (Ed.), Power Politics: Equity and Environment in Electricity Reform, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, pp. 51‐73.

Dubash, N.K. and Rao, D.N. (2008), “Regulatory practice and politics: lessons from independent regulation in Indian electricity”, Utilities Policy, Vol. 16, pp. 321‐31.

Ellram, L.M. and Pearson, J.N. (1993), “The role of the purchasing function: towards team participation”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Vol. 29, pp. 3‐9.

Evan, K.R. and Shultz, R.J. (1996), “Towards an understanding of public purchaser salesperson interaction activities: a public purchaser's perspective”, Journal of Non Profit and Public Sector Marketing, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 55‐75.

Fryer, K.J., Antony, J. and Douglas, A. (2007), “Critical success factors of continuous improvement in the public sector”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 19 No. 5, pp. 497‐515.

Goulding, A.J. (1997), “Retreating from the commanding heights: privatization in an Indian context”, Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 581‐602.

Goyal, S.K. (1996), “Political economy of India's economic reforms”, Working Paper Series No. WP1996/04, Institute for Studies in Industrial Development, New Delhi.

Guillen, M.F. (2000), “Business groups in emerging economies: a resource‐based view”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 362‐80.

Gurtoo, A. (2002), “North Electricity Board: a case of restructuring in the Indian power industry”, Asian Case Research Journal, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 27‐43.

Gurtoo, A. (2006), “Mindset challenges at Aluminum India Limited: privatization of a state owned enterprise”, Asian Case Research Journal, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 261‐80.

Gurtoo, A. (2008), “Knowledge management as strategic support for trade unions”, The International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, Vol. 8 No. 7, pp. 11‐20.

Gurtoo, A. and Pandey, R. (2001), “Power sector in Uttar Pradesh: past problems and initial phase of reforms”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XXXVI No. 31, pp. 2493‐503.

Hartley, J. and Allison, M. (2002), “Good, better, best? Inter‐organizational learning in a network of local authorities”, Public Management Review, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 101‐18.

Herrod, J.W. (1987), “Public purchasing: too many restrictions”, Purchasing World, Vol. 31, pp. 79‐80.

Hitt, M.A., Dacin, M.T., Levitas, E., Arregle, J.L. and Borza, A. (2000), “Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: resource‐based and organizational learning perspective”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 449‐67.

Hoskisson, R.E., Eden, L., Lau, C.M. and Wright, M. (2000), “Strategy in emerging economies”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 249‐67.

Hunt, B. and Ivergard, T. (2007), “Organizational climate and workplace efficiency: learning from performance measurement in a public‐sector cadre organization”, Public Management Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 27‐47.

Joldersma, C. and Winter, V. (2002), “Strategic management in hybrid organizations”, Public Management Review, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 83‐99.

Karande, K., Mahesh, N., Shankarmahesh and Rao, C.P. (1999), “Marketing to public and private sector companies in emerging countries: a study of Indian purchase managers”, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 64‐83.

Kher, M. (1997), Coping with Technological Change, Sage Publications, New Delhi.

Lee, H.S. (2001), “Paternalistic human resource practices: their emergence and characteristics”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 841‐69.

Luqmani, M., Habib, G.M. and Kassem, S. (1988), “Marketing to LDC governments”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 5, pp. 56‐67.

McCourt, W. (2001), “Towards a strategic model of employment reform in developing countries”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 56‐75.

Makadok, R. (2001), “Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability view of rent creation”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 387‐401.

Mathew, M., Hegde, M. and Garge, G. (2004), “Intellectual property in software: insights for Indian business”, Journal of Intellectual Property Research, Vol. 9, November, pp. 515‐32.

Mimba, N.P., van Helden, G.J. and Tillema, S. (2007), “Public sector performance measurement in developing countries: a literature review and research agenda”, Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 192‐208.

National Commissions of Labour (2003), National Commissions of Labour 2002‐1991‐1967: A Report, Academic Foundation, New Delhi.

Newman, K.L. and Nollen, S. (1998), Managing Radical Organizational Change, Sage Publications, London.

Nolan, P. and Xiaoqiang, W. (1999), “Beyond privatization: institutional innovation and growth in China's large state owned enterprises”, World Development, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 169‐200.

Parker, R. and Bradley, L. (2000), “Organizational culture in the public sector: evidence from six organizations”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 125‐41.

Patton, W.E. (1996), “Use of human judgement models in industrial buyers' vendor selection decision”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 25, pp. 35‐49.

Perry, J. and Rainey, H.G. (1988), “The public‐private distinction in organizational theory: a critique and research strategy”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, April, pp. 182‐201.

Peteraf, M.A. (1993), “The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource‐based view”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14 No. 8, pp. 95‐112.

Pisano, G.P. (1996), “Learning‐before‐doing in the development of new process technologies”, Research Policy, Vol. 25, pp. 1097‐119.

Polidano, C. and Hulme, D. (1999), “Public management reforms in developing countries: issues and outcomes”, Public Management Review, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 121‐32.

Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990), “The core competence of the corporation”, Harvard Business Review, May/June, pp. 79‐91.

Prud'homme, R. (1995), “The dangers of decentralization”, World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 201‐20.

Przeworski, A. (1991), Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Quinn, J.B. (1985), “Managing innovation: controlled chaos”, Harvard Business Review, May/June, pp. 73‐84.

Ramamurti, R. (1997), “Testing the limits of privatization: Argentine Railroads”, World Development, Vol. 25 No. 12, pp. 1973‐93.

Ramamurti, R. (1999), “Why haven't developing countries privatized deeper and faster?”, World Development, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 137‐55.

Ramaswamy, E.A. and Schiphorst, F.B. (2000), “Human resource management, trade unions and empowerment: two cases from India”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 664‐80.

Ramaswamy, K. and Renforth, W. (1996), “Competitive intensity and technical efficiency in public sector firms: evidence from India”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 4‐17.

Ramaswamy, K., Renforth, W. and Ramaswamy, V.K. (1995), “A comparative study of commercial profitability, managerial efficiency and public interest in SOEs and private firms in India: implications for privatization in developing countries”, Advances in International Comparative Management, Vol. 10, pp. 99‐124.

Rao, C.P. and Seshadri, S. (1996), “Industrial buyers' expectations of supplier attributes across developing countries: implications for marketing strategies”, International Executive, Vol. 38, pp. 671‐89.

Rao, C.P. and Wang, Z. (1995), “Evaluating alternative segmentation strategies in standard industrial markets”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 29, March, pp. 58‐75.

Rediff India Abroad (2006), “The new face of Indian public sector”, Business Standard, 2 August.

Russo, M.V. and Fouts, P. (1997), “Resource‐based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 534‐59.

Sachan, A. and Ali, A. (2006), “Competing in the age of information technology in developing economy: experience of an Indian bank”, Journal of Cases on Information Technology, April‐June, pp. 62‐81.

Sarkar, A.E. (2006), “New public management in developing countries: an analysis of success and failure with particular reference to Singapore and Bangladesh”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 80‐203.

Scott, P. and Falcone, S. (1998), “Comparing public and private organizations: an exploratory analysis of three frameworks”, American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 126‐45.

Shankar, T.L., Mishra, R.K. and Mohammed, A.L.F. (1994), “Divestments in public enterprises: the Indian experience”, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 69‐89.

Shirley, M.M. (1989), Reform of State Owned Enterprises: Lessons from Bank Lending, The World Bank, Washington, DC.

Shleifer, A. (1997), “Government in transition”, European Economic Review, Vol. 41 No. 3, pp. 385‐410.

Srivastava, D.K., Shah, H. and Mohammad, T. (2006), “Determinants of competitiveness in Indian public sector companies: an empirical analysis”, Competitiveness Review, Vol. 16 No. 3/4, pp. 212‐23.

Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997), “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18 No. 7, pp. 509‐33.

Tonnisson, K. and Wilson, J. (2007), “Best value in transitional countries? Some evidence from Estonia”, Public Management Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 87‐106.

Ulrich, D. and Lake, D. (1990), Organizational Capability: Competing from the Inside out, Wiley, New York, NY.

United Nations (2000), World Investment Report 2000: Cross‐border Mergers and Acquisitions and Development, United Nations, New York, NY.

Uppal, J.S. (1982), “Economic planning in a mixed economy: the Indian experience”, International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 9 Nos 6/7, pp. 50‐62.

Venkataratnam, C.S. (2001), Globalisation and Labour Management Relations: Dynamics of Change, Response Books, New Delhi.

Verma, A., Kochan, T.A. and Lansbury, R.D. (1995), “Labour relations in an era of global markets: a conceptual framework paper”, in Verma, A., Kochan, T.A. and Lansbury, R. (Eds), Labour Relations in the Growing Asian Economies, Routledge, London, pp. 1‐26.

Verona, G. (1999), “A resource‐based view of product development”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 132‐42.

Vining, A. and Broadman, A. (1992), “Ownership versus competition: efficiency in public enterprise”, Public Choice, Vol. 73, pp. 205‐39.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A resource‐based view of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 171‐80.

White, T. (2001), China Briefing 2000: The Continuing Transformation, M.E. Sharpe, New York, NY.

World Bank (1995), Bureaucrats in Business: The Economics and Politics of Government Ownership, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

Yarrow, G. (1999), “A theory of privatization, or why bureaucrats are still in business”, World Development, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 157‐68.

Zahra, S.A., Ireland, R.D., Gutierrez, I. and Hitt, M.A. (2000), “Privatization and entrepreneurial transformation: emerging issues and a future research agenda”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 509‐24.