Acute renal failure. I. Relative importance of proximal vs. distal tubular injury

American Journal of Physiology - Renal Physiology - Tập 275 Số 5 - Trang F623-F632 - 1998
Wilfred Lieberthal1, Sanjay K. Nigám
1Renal Section, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.

Tóm tắt

For more than 15 years, there has been an ongoing debate regarding the nephron segment(s) most severely injured in acute renal failure (ARF) induced by an ischemic or toxic insult. Although some investigators have argued that the proximal tubule (and particularly the S3 segment) is the major target of injury in ARF, others have held the view that damage to the distal nephron [particularly the medullary thick ascending limb (MTAL) segment] plays a more important role in this disease. In this discussion, the first of three on different aspects of ARF that have been hotly debated, we have invited several experts to discuss their opinions on this issue. The goals of this first discussion (and the subsequent two articles in this forum) are to establish areas of consensus in each area of controversy and also to identify unanswered questions that represent important areas for future research.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1038/ki.1981.63

Bagnasco S., 1985, Am. J. Physiol., 248, F522

10.1038/ki.1995.249

10.1097/00041552-199605000-00011

10.1091/mbc.2.3.251

10.1210/endo.137.1.8536636

Brezis M., 1994, Am. J. Physiol., 267, F1059

10.1146/annurev.me.44.020193.000331

10.1002/jemt.1060090306

10.1056/NEJM199503093321006

10.1172/JCI111189

10.1126/science.6322305

10.1038/ki.1984.9

Brezis M., 1984, Am. J. Pathol., 116, 327

10.1172/JCI112171

Cantin M., 1979, Am. J. Pathol., 96, 545

10.1172/JCI119272

10.1053/ajkd.1998.v31.pm9531191

10.1038/ki.1978.31

10.1042/cs0760019

Gobé G. C., 1990, Lab. Invest., 63, 770

Goligorsky M., 1993, Am. J. Physiol., 264, F1

10.1016/0925-4439(93)90071-8

10.1016/0003-9861(92)90492-F

10.1097/00041552-199505000-00011

Hanley M. J., 1980, Am. J. Physiol., 239, F17

10.1016/S0272-6386(12)80838-9

Heyman S. N., 1994, Exp. Nephrol., 2, 153

Heyman S., 1993, J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., 4, 69, 10.1681/ASN.V4169

Jaffe R., 1997, Exp. Nephrol., 5, 399

10.1172/JCI118498

Kriz W., 1981, Am. J. Physiol., 241, R3

Lieberthal W., 1988, Renal Physiol. Biochem., 11, 60

Molitoris B., 1997, Am. J. Physiol., 272, F430

10.1038/ki.1996.231

10.1007/BF00212525

Nagle R. B., 1973, Lab. Invest., 28, 456

10.1016/0002-9343(53)90143-0

10.1172/JCI102550

10.1097/00005792-198905000-00005

10.1111/j.1699-0463.1990.tb05046.x

10.1016/S0272-6386(12)80973-5

10.1038/ki.1997.349

Price P., 1995, Am. J. Physiol., 268, F664

Rosen S., 1994, Miner. Electrolyte Metab., 20, 174

10.3109/08860229209106636

10.1097/00007890-199002000-00041

Ruegg C. E., 1990, Am. J. Physiol., 259, F176

Safirstein R., 1994, J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., 4, 1387, 10.1681/ASN.V471387

Safirstein R., 1991, Am. J. Physiol., 261, F1095

Shanley P. F., 1986, Am. J. Pathol., 122, 462

10.1203/00006450-199408000-00001

10.1097/00005792-197909000-00003

10.1038/ki.1993.148

10.1016/S0024-3205(96)00604-2

10.1056/NEJM199605303342207

Vandewalle A., 1981, Am. J. Physiol., 240, F492

10.1038/ki.1978.87

10.1172/JCI117214

10.1016/S0272-6386(12)80694-9

Zager R. A., 1987, J. Lab. Clin. Med., 110, 396

Zager R. A., 1986, Am. J. Physiol., 251, F87

10.1161/01.RES.65.5.1263