Activation of the <i>N</i>‐methyl‐<scp>d</scp>‐aspartate receptor is involved in glyphosate‐induced renal proximal tubule cell apoptosis

Journal of Applied Toxicology - Tập 39 Số 8 - Trang 1096-1107 - 2019
Hui Gao1, Jing Chen2, Fan Ding1, Xin Chou1, Xiaoyan Zhang2,3,4, Yi Wan5, Jianying Hu5, Qing Wu1
1School of Public Health and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of the Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
2Department of Nephrology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
3Shanghai Institute of Kidney and Dialysis, Shanghai 200032, China
4Shanghai Key Laboratory of Kidney and Blood Purification, Shanghai 200032, China
5Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Tóm tắt

AbstractGlyphosate‐based herbicides have been used worldwide for decades and have been suggested to induce nephrotoxicity, but the underlying mechanism is not yet clear. In this study, we treated a human renal proximal tubule cell line (HK‐2) with glyphosate for 24 hours at concentrations of 0, 20, 40 and 60 μm. Glyphosate was found to reduce cell viability and induce apoptosis and oxidative stress in a dose‐dependent manner. Because the chemical structures of glyphosate and those of its metabolite AMPA are similar to glycine and glutamate, which are agonists of the N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate receptor (NMDAR), we investigated the potential role of the NMDAR pathway in mediating the proapoptotic effect of glyphosate on proximal tubule cells. We found that NMDAR1 expression, as well as intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, increased after glyphosate treatment. Blocking NMDAR attenuated glyphosate‐induced upregulation of [Ca2+]i and ROS levels as well as apoptosis. Meanwhile, inhibition of [Ca2+]i reduced glyphosate‐induced ROS and apoptosis, and inhibition of ROS alleviated glyphosate‐induced apoptosis. In mice exposed to 400 mg/kg glyphosate, the urine low molecular weight protein levels started to increase from day 7. Upregulation of apoptosis and NMDAR1 expression in renal proximal tubule epithelium and an imbalance of oxidant and antioxidative products were observed. These results strongly suggest that activation of the NMDAR1 pathway, together with its downstream [Ca2+]i and oxidative stress, is involved in glyphosate‐induced renal proximal tubule epithelium apoptosis.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1289/ehp.6667

10.1007/BF00857888

10.1289/ehp.01109851

10.1002/ps.775

BfR (Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung)(2015).BfR‐contribution to the EU‐approval process of glyphosate is finalised. Retrieved fromhttps://mobil.bfr.bund.de/cm/349/bfr‐contribution‐to‐the‐eu‐approval‐process‐of‐glyphosate‐is‐finalised.pdf

10.1152/ajpcell.00139.2004

10.1016/j.tox.2017.06.001

10.1016/j.tox.2014.03.001

10.4141/cjps94-117

10.4141/P99-062

10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.063

10.1186/s12302-015-0052-7

Davies J., 1979, Excitatory amino acid receptors and synaptic excitation in the mammalian central nervous system, Journal de Physiologie, 75, 641

10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.06.043

10.1177/1091581818779553

10.1152/ajprenal.90391.2008

10.1038/nbt.1622

10.1002/ps.3863

10.1002/ps.1518

EPA US(1993).Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for Glyphosate. Retrieved fromhttps://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/reregistration/red_PC‐417300_1‐Sep‐93.pdf

FAO/WHO. (2007).Pesticide Residues in Food 2006: Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Residues in Food and the Environment and the WHO Core Assessment Group Rome Italy 3–12 October 2006. World Health Organization; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved fromhttp://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/Pests_Pesticides/JMPR/JMPRrepor2006.pdf

FAO‐WHO. (2016).Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR). Pesticide residues in food—2016 Retrieved fromhttp://www.fao.org/3/a‐i5693e.pdf.

10.1097/MNH.0000000000000380

10.1016/j.tox.2009.06.006

10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.02.013

10.1016/j.redox.2015.08.010

10.1007/s12012-014-9282-y

10.1080/15376516.2016.1230918

10.1897/03-71

10.1021/es034847h

10.1016/S0021-9258(18)53849-7

10.3390/ijerph110202125

10.1186/1476-069X-14-6

Krüger M., 2014, Detection of glyphosate residues in animals and humans, Journal of Environmental & Analytical Toxicology, 4, 1

10.1152/ajpregu.00629.2001

10.1371/journal.pone.0132204

10.1371/journal.pone.0131416

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-21-08005.2000

Mensink D. H. &Janssen D. P.(2018).Glyphosate. Environmental Health Criteria No. 159. Geneva: World Health Organization. Retrieved fromhttp://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc159.htm.

10.1186/s12940-015-0056-1

10.1007/s00204-018-2236-6

10.2478/aiht-2018-69-3114

10.1186/s12940-016-0117-0

NAWQA (National Water‐Quality Assessment)(2012).Estimated Agricultural Use for Glyphosate. Retrieved fromhttps://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/pnsp/usage/maps/show_map.php?year=2012&map=GLYPHOSATE&hilo=L&disp=Glyphosate

10.1007/s00003-014-0927-3

10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.11.039

10.1038/ki.1994.6

10.1017/S0043174500052929

10.1007/s00128-008-9373-1

Swanson N. L., 2014, Genetically engineered crops, glyphosate and the deterioration of health in the United States of America, Journal of Organic Systems, 9, 6

10.3389/fphys.2017.01083

10.1007/s00580-013-1740-6

WHO (World Health Organization)(2017).Some organophosphate insecticides and herbicides. Retrieved fromhttp://apps.who.int/bookorders/anglais/detart1.jsp?codlan=1&codcol=72&codcch=112

10.7150/ijbs.6426

10.1080/10937404.2012.632361

10.1006/rtph.1999.1371

10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.12.009

10.1038/nbt.1624

10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.009