Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride

European Journal of Social Psychology - Tập 31 Số 1 - Trang 3-23 - 2001
E. Tory Higgins1, Ronald Friedman1, Robert E. Harlow1, Lorraine Chen Idson1, Özlem Ayduk1, Amy Taylor1
1Columbia University, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractA new task goal elicits a feeling of pride in individuals with a subjective history of success, and this achievment pride produces anticipatory goal reactions that energize and direct behavior to approach the task goal. By distinguishing between promotion pride and prevention pride, the present paper extends this classic model of achievement motivation. Regulatory focus theory (Higgins, 1997) distinguishes between a promotion focus on hopes and accomplishments (gains) and a prevention focus on safety and responsibilities (non‐losses). We propose that a subjective history of success with promotion‐related eagerness (promotion pride) orients individuals toward using eagerness means to approach a new task goal, whereas a subjective history of success with prevention‐related vigilance (prevention pride) orients individuals toward using vigilance means to approach a new task goal. Studies 1–3 tested this proposal by examining the relations between a new measure of participants' subjective histories of promotion success and prevention success (the Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ)) and their achievement strategies in different tasks. Study 4 examined the relation between participants' RFQ responses and their reported frequency of feeling eager or vigilant in past task engagements. Study 5 used an experimental priming technique to make participants temporarily experience either a subjective history of promotion success or a subjective history of prevention success. For both chronic and situationally induced achievement pride, these studies found that when approaching task goals individuals with promotion pride use eagerness means whereas individuals with prevention pride use vigilance means. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/0749-5978(85)90049-4

Atkinson JW, 1964, An Introduction to Motivation

AydukON.1999.Impact of self‐control strategies on the link between rejection sensitivity and hostility: Risk negotiation through strategic control. Unpublished dissertation Columbia University.

10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319

CroweE.1995.The impact of regulatory focus on decision‐making and problem‐solving. Unpublished dissertation Columbia University.

10.1006/obhd.1996.2675

10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1115

Freud S, 1952, A General Introduction to Psychoanalysis

FriedmanRS.1999.The phenomenological correlates and consequences of distinct self‐regulatory systems. Unpublished dissertation Columbia University.

10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319

10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00488.x

Higgins ET, 1996, Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 133

10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280

10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60381-0

10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.5

10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.276

10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.515

Jackson DN, 1974, The Personality Research Form

Joreskog KG, 1993, Windows Lisrel 8.14

Kruglanski AW, 1996, Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 329

Lewin K, 1935, A Dynamic Theory of Personality: Selected papers

10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1135

Liberman N, 2000, Generating hypotheses: A regulatory focus perspective, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

10.1037/10790-000

10.1037/14359-000

10.1037/11144-000

10.1080/08917779008249328

Mischel W, 1996, Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 329

10.1037/10802-000

10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.447

10.1037/h0058700

Trope Y, 1996, Social Psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 239