Accounting Education Research: Ranking Institutions and Individual Scholars
Tóm tắt
Previous rankings of accounting literature have largely ignored the subtopic of accounting education research. Given the important role that rankings play in creating incentives and benchmarks, ranking education research may improve both the quality and quantity of research in this subtopic. This paper ranks academic institutions and individual accounting researchers based on their production of accounting education research. We show that the correlation between education research rankings and singular, noneducation research rankings is very low (i.e., ranges from 0.20 to 0.31), emphasizing the importance of considering education rankings separately from other topical areas in accounting research. We also provide evidence of the institutional factors that contribute to producing accounting education research and when professors produce this type of research in their careers. These findings will likely be of interest to current faculty, administrators, and industry leaders as they make decisions based on accounting education research.
JEL Classifications: M4; M40; M41; M49.
Data Availability: Requests for data may be made to the authors.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Andrews, 1978, Leading accounting departments revisited, The Accounting Review, 53, 135
Ballas, 2003, Exploring diversity in accounting through faculty journal perceptions, Contemporary Accounting Research, 20, 619, 10.1506/MLWH-KBTM-ET47-LYKH
Bazley, 1975, A comparison of published accounting research and qualities of accounting faculty and doctoral programs, The Accounting Review, 50, 605
Bonner, 2006, The most influential journals in academic accounting, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 663, 10.1016/j.aos.2005.06.003
Borde, 1999, A note on perceptions of finance journal quality, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 12, 89, 10.1023/A:1008324825813
Brown, 1994, The familiarity with and perceived quality of accounting journals: Views of senior accounting faculty in leading U.S. M.B.A. programs, Contemporary Accounting Research, 11, 223, 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1994.tb00442.x
Bublitz, 1984, Measures of research productivity, Issues in Accounting Education, 2, 39
Chan, 2009, Ranking accounting journals using dissertation citation analysis: A research note, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 875, 10.1016/j.aos.2008.12.002
Coyne, 2010, Accounting program research rankings by topical area and methodology, Issues in Accounting Education, 25, 631, 10.2308/iace.2010.25.4.631
Glover, 2012, Publication benchmarking data based on faculty promoted at the top-75 U.S. accounting research institutions, Issues in Accounting Education, 27, 647, 10.2308/iace-50140
Glover, 2006, Publication records of faculty promoted at the top-75 accounting research programs, Issues in Accounting Education, 21, 195, 10.2308/iace.2006.21.3.195
Hasselback, J. R., A. Reinstein, and M. Abdolmohammadi. 2012. Benchmarking the Research Productivity of Accounting Doctorates. Working paper, The Florida State University, Wayne State University, and Bentley University.
Hasselback, 2000, Benchmarks for evaluating the research productivity of accounting faculty, Journal of Accounting Education, 18, 79, 10.1016/S0748-5751(00)00009-9
Herron, 2004, Faculty perceptions of journals: Quality and publishing feasibility, Journal of Accounting Education, 22, 175, 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2004.09.002
Hult, 2009, Worldwide faculty perceptions of marketing journals: Rankings, trends, comparisons, and segmentations, Global Edge Business Review, 3, 1
Jacobs, 1986, Publication productivity of doctoral alumni: A time-adjusted model, The Accounting Review, 61, 179
Kachelmeier, 2009, Annual report and editorial commentary for The Accounting Review, The Accounting Review, 84, 2047, 10.2308/accr.2009.84.6.2047
Kachelmeier, 2010, Annual report and editorial commentary for The Accounting Review, The Accounting Review, 85, 2173, 10.2308/accr.00000003
Kachelmeier, 2011, Annual report and editorial commentary for The Accounting Review, The Accounting Review, 86, 2197, 10.2308/accr-10141
Lee, 1995, Shaping the U.S. academic accounting research profession: The American Accounting Association and the social construction of an elite, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 6, 241, 10.1006/cpac.1995.1023
Lee, 1999, Accounting from the inside: Legitimizing the accounting academic elite, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 10, 867, 10.1006/cpac.1998.0281
Locke, 2008, Evidence and implications of multiple paradigms in accounting knowledge production, European Accounting Review, 17, 161, 10.1080/09638180701819881
Lowensohn, 2006, An examination of faculty perceptions of academic journal quality within five specialized areas of accounting research, Issues in Accounting Education, 21, 219, 10.2308/iace.2006.21.3.219
Pathways Commission. 2012. The Pathways Commission: Charting a National Strategy for the Next Generation of Accountants. Available at: http://commons.aaahq.org/files/0b14318188/Pathways_Commission_Final_Report_Complete.pdf
Pickerd, 2011, Individual accounting faculty research rankings by topical area and methodology, Issues in Accounting Education, 26, 471, 10.2308/iace-50002
Reinstein, 1997, A literature review of articles assessing the productivity of accounting faculty, Journal of Accounting Education, 15, 425, 10.1016/S0748-5751(97)00015-8
Stephens, 2010, Accounting doctoral program rankings based on research productivity of program graduates, Accounting Horizons, 25, 149, 10.2308/acch.2011.25.1.149
Windal, 1981, Publishing for a varied public: An empirical study, The Accounting Review, 56, 653
Zivney, 1995, A comprehensive examination of accounting faculty publishing, Issues in Accounting Education, 10, 1