Academic competence and affect self-concepts in elementary school students: Social and dimensional comparisons

Arens, A. K., & Hasselhorn, M. (2015). Differentiation of competence and affect self-perceptions in elementary school students: Extending empirical evidence. European Journal of Psychology of Education,30, 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0247-8. Arens, A. K., & Preckel, F. (2018). Testing the internal/external frame of reference model with elementary school children: Extension to physical ability and intrinsic value. Contemporary Educational Psychology,54, 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.003. Arens, A. K., Trautwein, U., & Hasselhorn, M. (2011a). Erfassung des Selbstkonzepts im mittleren Kindesalter: Validierung einer deutschen Version des SDQ I [Self-concept acquisition for middle aged children: Validation of a German version of the SDQ I]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie,25, 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652/a000030. Arens, A. K., Yeung, A. S., Craven, R. G., & Hasselhorn, M. (2011b). The twofold multidimensionality of academic self-concept: Domain specificity and separation between competence and affect components. Journal of Educational Psychology,103, 970–981. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025047. Arens, A. K., Yeung, A. S., & Hasselhorn, M. (2014). Native language self-concept and reading self-concept: Same or different? The Journal of Experimental Education,82, 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2013.813362. Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? Educational Psychology Review,15, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302408382. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling,14, 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling,9, 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5. Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York: Guilford Press. Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development,64, 830–847. Ehm, J.-H., Lindberg, S., & Hasselhorn, M. (2014). Reading, writing, and mathematics self-concept in elementary school children: Influence of dimensional comparison processes. European Journal of Psychology of Education,29, 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-013-0198-x. Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Hall, N. C., & Pekrun, R. (2008). Antecedents of academic emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment. Contemporary Educational Psychology,33, 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.002. Guay, F., Marsh, H. W., & Boivin, M. (2003). Academic self-concept and academic achievement: Developmental perspectives on their causal ordering. Journal of Educational Psychology,95, 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.124. Harter, S. (2006). The self. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3, 6th ed., pp. 505–570). New York, NY: Wiley. Helmke, A. (1999). From optimism to realism? Development of children’s academic self-concept from kindergarten to grade six. In W. Schneider & F. E. Weinert (Eds.), Individual development from 3 to 12. Findings from the Munich Longitudinal Study (pp. 198–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Heyder, A. (2015). Mehr als Erwartungen und Werte: Zur Rolle von Stereotypen für den differenziellen Schulerfolg von Mädchen und Jungen [Beyond expactancies and values: On the role of stereotypes fort he differential academic success of girls and boys]. Doctoral dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany. Kadir, M. S., Yeung, A. S., & Diallo, T. M. O. (2017). Simultaneous testing of four decades of academic self-concept models. Contemporary Educational Psychology,51, 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.09.008. Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford. Lohbeck, A. (2019). Social and dimensional comparison effects on academic self-concepts and self-perceptions of effort in elementary school children. Educational Psychology,39, 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1527018. Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and mathematics self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal,23, 129–149. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023001129. Marsh, H. W. (1992). Self-description Questionnaire (SDQ) I: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept. A test manual and research monograph. Sydney: University of Western Sydney Macarthur, Faculty of Education. Marsh, H. W. (2007). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology. Leicester: British Psychological Society. Marsh, H. W., & Ayotte, V. (2003). Do multiple dimensions of self-concept become more differentiated with age? The differential distinctiveness hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology,95, 687–706. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.687. Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Debus, R. (1999). Separation of competency and affect components of multiple dimensions of academic self-concept: A developmental perspective. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,45, 567–601. Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K.-T. (2004). Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: Cross-cultural generalizability of the internal/external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology,96, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.56. Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005). Academic self-concept, interest, grades, and standardized test scores: Reciprocal effects model of causal ordering. Child Development,76, 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x. Möller, J., & Marsh, H. W. (2013). Dimensional comparison theory. Psychological Review,120, 544–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032459. Möller, J., Müller-Kalthoff, H., Helm, F., Nagy, N., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). The generalized internal/external frame of reference model: An extension to dimensional comparison theory. Frontline Learning Research,4, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v3i5.169. Möller, J., Pohlmann, B., Köller, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2009). A meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept. Review of Educational Research,79, 1129–1167. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309337522. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2013). MPlus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Pinxten, M., Marsh, H. W., De Fraine, B., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Van Damme, J. (2014). Enjoying mathematics or feeling competent in mathematics? Reciprocal effects on mathematics achievement and perceived mathematics effort expenditure. British Journal of Educational Psychology,84, 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12028. Pohlmann, B. (2005). Konsequenzen dimensionaler Vergleiche [Consequences of dimensional comparisons]. Münster: Waxmann. Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2014). Reading achievement and reading self-concept—testing the reciprocal effects model. Learning and Instruction,29, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.004. Rost, D. H., & Sparfeldt, J. R. (2002). Facetten des schulischen Selbstkonzepts: Ein Verfahren zur Messung des differentiellen Selbstkonzepts schulischer Leistungen und Fähigkeiten (DISK-Gitter) [Academic self-concept facets: A method to assess differential self-concepts of scholastic achievements and abilities (DISK grid)]. Diagnostica,48, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.48.3.130. Rost, D. H., Sparfeldt, J. R., Dickhäuser, O., & Schilling, S. R. (2005). Dimensional comparisons in subject-specific academic self-concepts and achievements: A quasi-experimental approach. Learning and Instruction,15, 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.08.003. Satorra, A. (2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. In R. D. H. Heijmans, D. S. G. Pollock, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis. A Festschrift for Heinz Neudecker (pp. 233–247). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Schmidt, I., Brunner, M., Keller, L., Scherrer, V., Wollschläger, R., Baudson, T. G., et al. (2017a). Profile information of academic self-concept in elementary school students in grades 1 to 4. PLoS ONE,12, e0177854. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177854. Schmidt, I., Brunner, M., & Preckel, F. (2017b). Effects of achievement differences for internal/external frame of reference model investigations: A test of robustness of findings over diverse student samples. British Journal of Educational Psychology,88, 513–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12198. Schurtz, I. M., Pfost, M., Nagengast, B., & Artelt, C. (2014). Impact of social and dimensional comparisons on student’s mathematical and English subject-interest at the beginning of secondary school. Learning and Instruction,34, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.001. Sewasew, D., & Schroeders, U. (2019). The developmental interplay of academic self-concept and achievement within and across domains among primary school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology,58, 204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.009. Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research,46, 407–441. Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2002). Internal and external frame of reference for academic self-concept. Educational Psychologist,37, 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3704_3. Spinath, B., Spinath, F. M., Harlaar, N., & Plomin, R. (2006). Predicting school achievement from general cognitive ability, self-perceived ability, and intrinsic value. Intelligence,34, 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.11.004. Swann, W. B., Chang-Schneider, C., & Larsen McClarty, K. (2007). Do people’s self-views matter? Self-concept and self-esteem in everyday life. American Psychologist,62, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.84. Valtin, R., Wagner, C., & Schwippert, K. (2005). Schülerinnen und Schüler am Ende der vierten Klasse—schulische Leistungen, lernbezogene Einstellungen und außerschulische Lernbedingungen [Students at the end of grade four—scholastic achievements, learning-related attitudes, and non-scholastic learning conditions]. In W. Bos, E.-M. Lankes, M. Prenzel, K. Schwippert, R. Valtin, & G. Walther (Eds.), IGLU. Vertiefende Analysen zu Leseverständnis, Rahmenbedingungen und Zusatzstudien [IGLU. In-depth analyses of reading comprehension, framework conditions, and additional studies] (pp. 187–238). Münster: Waxmann. Weidinger, A. F., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2019). Ability self-concept formation in elementary school: No dimensional comparison effects across time. Developmental Psychology,55, 1005–1018. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000695. Weiß, R. H., & Osterland, J. (2013). CFT 1-R. Grundintelligenzskala 1—revision [CFT1-R. Intelligence scale]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology,25, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.101. Wittmann, W. W. (1988). Multivariate reliability theory. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 505–560). New York: Plenum Press.