AI-enabled price discrimination as an abuse of dominance: a law and economics analysis
Tóm tắt
In digital markets, concentrated Big Data and analytical algorithms enable undertakings to predict each consumer’s willingness to pay with increasing accuracy and offer consumers personalized recommendations and tailored prices accordingly. In this context, concerns have arisen about whether and when AI-enabled price discrimination amounts to an abuse of dominance under competition law and would require a legal response. To address these concerns, this paper will analyze AI-enabled price discrimination from a comparative law and economics perspective. In economics, price discrimination is not always undesirable as it can increase static efficiency, and, on some occasions, it can promote dynamic efficiency and boost consumer welfare. Nevertheless, it may also lead to exclusionary and exploitative effects, especially once Tech Giants abuse their dominant positions in relevant markets. Since the protection of free competition and consumer welfare are objectives of competition law in China and the EU, competition law seems a proper instrument to step into digital markets to address these concerns. Indeed, the EU and China have established mixed regimes of competition law and other rules to tackle unfair and/or anti-competitive AI-enabled price discrimination. As such, AI-enabled price discrimination does not always require a competition law response and it requires competition authorities to make a trade-off between different considerations.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Armstrong, Mark, Price Discrimination (2006)
Beckert W, Smith H, Takahashi Y (2015) Competitive price discrimination in a spatially differentiated intermediate goods market, University of London Working Paper
Botta M, Wiedemann K (2020) To discriminate or not to discriminate? Personalised pricing in online markets as exploitative abuse of dominance. Eur J Law Econ 50:381–404
Calo R (2014) Digital market manipulation. George Washington Law Rev 82:995–1051
Carlton DW, Perloff JM (1999) Modern industrial organization. Pearson
Chen Y (1997) Paying customers to switch. J Econ Manag Strat 6:877–897
Chen Z, Choe C, Matsushima N (2018) Competitive personalized pricing, The Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, Discussion Paper No. 1023 available at http://www.iser.osaka-u.ac.jp/library/dp/2018/DP1023.pdf
Cuddeford-Jones M (2013) Effective revenue management in the hospitality industry, Eye for Travel, White Paper
EAGCP, Economic Advisory Group for Competition Policy (2005) EAGCP Report on An Economic approach to Article 82 EC, available at https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/competition/economist/eagcp_july_21_05.pdf
Ezrachi A, Stucke ME (2016a) The rise of behavioural discrimination. Eur Comp Law Rev 37(2):485–492
Ezrachi A, Stucke ME (2016b) Virtual competition: the promise and perils of the algorithm-driven economy. Harvard University Press
Geradin D, Petit N (2005) Price discrimination under EC competition law: the need for a case by-case approach, The Global Competition Law Centre Working Papers Series GCLC Working Paper 07/05
Guidance on the Commission’s enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings (2009/C 45/02) [2009] OJ C 45, p.7- 20
Graef I (2018) Algorithms and fairness: what role for competition law in targeting price discrimination towards ends consumers. Columbia J Eur Law 24(3):541–560
Graef I (2019) Differentiated treatment in platform-to-business relations: EU competition law and economic dependence. Yearb Eur Law 38(1):448–499
Graef I, Sovereignty C, Law C (2021) From personalization to diversity. Common Market Law Rev 58(2):471–504
Hastings J (2008) Wholesale price discrimination and regulation: implications for retail gasoline prices, Working Paper, Yale University
Ibáñez Colomo P (2014) Exclusionary discrimination under article 102 TFEU. Common Market Law Rev 51(1):141–163
Lianos I, Korah V, Siciliani P (2019) Competition law. Oxford University Press, Berlin
OECD (2004) Background Paper on Predatory Foreclosure, DAF/COMP (2005)14
OECD (2009) Background Paper on Margin Squeeze, DAF/COMP (2009)36
OECD (2016a) Executive Summary of the Roundtable on Price Discrimination Annex to the Summary Record of the 126th meeting of the Competition Committee, DAF/COMP/M(2016a)2/ANN5/FINAL
OECD (2016b) Executive Summary of the Competition Committee Roundtable on Big Data, DAF/COMP/M(2016b)2/ANN4/FINAL
OECD (2016c) Price Discrimination–Background Note by the Secretariat, DAF/COMP 15
OECD (2016d) Price Discrimination¬Note by Dennis W. Carlton, DAF/COMP/WD 82
OECD (2017a) Algorithms and Collusion: Competition Policy in the Digital Age, available at www.oecd.org/competition/algorithms-collusion-competition-policy-in-the-digital-age.htm
OECD (2017b) Executive Summary of the Competition Committee Roundtable on Algorithms and Collusion, DAF/COMP/M(2017b)1/ANN3/FINAL
OECD (2018) Personalised Pricing in the Digital Era - Background Note by the Secretariat, DAF/COMP 13
OECD (2020) Consumer Data Rights and Competition: Background note by the Secretariat, DAF/COMP 1
O’donoghue R, Padilla J (2013) Law and economics of Article 102 TFEU. Hart Publishing
Pigou A (1920) The economics of welfare. McMillan & Co.
Ritter L, Branu D (2004) European competition law: a practictioner’s guide. Kluwer Law International, p 465
Roller L-H (2007) Exploitative Abuses; Business Brief, No. BB-107–002; ESMT European School of Management and Technology
Schmalensee R (1981) Output and welfare implications of third-degree price discrimination. Am Econ Rev 71(1):242–247
Scherer FM, Ross D (1990) Industrial market structure and economic performance, 3rd edn. Houghton Mifflin
Schwartz M (1990) Third-degree price discrimination and output: generalizing a welfare result. Am Econ Rev 80(5):1259–1262
Swarup P (2012) Artificial intelligence. Int J Comput Corp Res 2(4). http://www.ijccr.com/july2012/4.pdf
Townley C, Morrison E, Yeung K (2019) Big data and personalized price discrimination in EU competition law
Van Den Bergh R (2017) Comparative competition law and economics. Edward Elgar
Varian H (1985) Price discrimination and social welfare. Am Econ Rev 75(4):870–875
Viscusi WK, Harrington JE, Vernon JM (2005) Economics of regulation and antitrust, 4th edn. MIT Press
Wei H, Gao Y, D, A (2019) Algorithmic price discrimination on online platforms and antitrust enforcement in China’s Digital Economy
Weishaar S (2010) A primer on Competition Economics and Law, Policy, and EU Integration