ADHD-KG: a knowledge graph of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Health Information Science and Systems - Tập 11 - Trang 1-13 - 2023
Emmanuel Papadakis1, George Baryannis1, Sotiris Batsakis1, Marios Adamou2, Zhisheng Huang3, Grigoris Antoniou1
1School of Computing and Engineering, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
2South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Wakefield, UK
3Department of Computer Science, Vrije University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a widespread condition that affects human behaviour and can interfere with daily activities and relationships. Medication or medical information about ADHD can be found in several data sources on the Web. Such distribution of knowledge raises notable obstacles since researchers and clinicians must manually combine various sources to deeply explore aspects of ADHD. Knowledge graphs have been widely used in medical applications due to their data integration capabilities, offering rich data stores of information built from heterogeneous sources; however, general purpose knowledge graphs cannot represent knowledge in sufficient detail, thus there is an increasing interest in domain-specific knowledge graphs. In this work we propose a Knowledge Graph of ADHD. In particular, we introduce an automated procedure enabling the construction of a knowledge graph that covers knowledge from a wide range of data sources primarily focusing on adult ADHD. These include relevant literature and clinical trials, prescribed medication and their known side-effects. Data integration between these data sources is accomplished by employing a suite of information linking procedures, which aim to connect resources by relating them to common concepts found in medical thesauri. The usability and appropriateness of the developed knowledge graph is evaluated through a series of use cases that illustrate its ability to enhance and accelerate information retrieval. The Knowledge Graph of ADHD can provide valuable assistance to researchers and clinicians in the research, training, diagnostic and treatment processes for ADHD.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Asherson P, Agnew-Blais J. Annual research review: does late-onset attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder exist? J Child Psychol Psychiatr. 2019;60(4):333–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13020.

Antoniou G, Papadakis E, Baryannis G. Mental health diagnosis: a case for explainable artificial intelligence. Int J Artif Intell Tools. 2022;31(03):2241003. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218213022410032.

Panahiazar M, Taslimitehrani V, Jadhav A, Pathak J. Empowering Personalized Medicine with Big Data and Semantic Web Technology: Promises, Challenges, and Use Cases. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, IEEE; 2014. p. 790–795. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2014.7004307 .

Jovanovik M, Trajanov D. Consolidating drug data on a global scale using Linked Data. J Biomed Semant. 2017;8(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13326-016-0111-z.

Cyganiak R, Wood D, Lanthaler M, Klyne G, Carroll JJ, McBride B. Rdf 1.1 concepts and abstract syntax. W3C Recommendation. 2014;25(02):1–22.

Goodwin T, Harabagiu SM. Automatic generation of a qualified medical knowledge graph and its usage for retrieving patient cohorts from electronic medical records. In: 2013 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Semantic Computing, IEEE; 2013. p. 363–370. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC.2013.68 .

Ansong S, Eteffa KF, Li C, Sheng M, Zhang Y, Xing C. How to empower disease diagnosis in a medical education system using knowledge graph. In: International Conference on Web Information Systems and Applications, Springer; 2019. p. 518–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30952-7_52 .

Sheng M, Hu Q, Zhang Y, Xing C, Zhang T. A data-intensive CDSS platform based on knowledge graph. In: International Conference on Health Information Science, Springer; 2018. p. 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01078-2_13.

Zamborlini V, Hoekstra R, Da Silveira M, Pruski C, Ten Teije A, Van Harmelen F. Inferring recommendation interactions in clinical guidelines. Semant Web. 2016;7(4):421–46. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-150212.

Huang Z, Hu Q, Liao M, Miao C, Wang C, Liu G. Knowledge graphs of kawasaki disease. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2021;9(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13755-020-00130-8.

Zhang Y-F, Gou L, Zhou T-S, Lin D-N, Zheng J, Li Y, Li J-S. An ontology-based approach to patient follow-up assessment for continuous and personalized chronic disease management. J Biomed Inf. 2017;72:45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.06.021.

Zhang Y, Sheng M, Zhou R, Wang Y, Han G, Zhang H, Xing C, Dong J. HKGB: an inclusive, extensible, intelligent, semi-auto-constructed knowledge graph framework for healthcare with clinicians’ expertise incorporated. Inf Process Manag. 2020;57(6): 102324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102324.

Huang Z, Yang J, Harmelen Fv, Hu Q. Constructing knowledge graphs of depression. In: International Conference on Health Information Science, Springer; 2017. p. 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69182-4_16.

Lipscomb CE. Medical subject headings (MeSH). Bull Med Libr Assoc. 2000;88(3):265.

White J. Pubmed 2.0. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 2020;39(4), 382–387.

Stergiopoulos S, Getz KA, Blazynski C. Evaluating the completeness of ClinicalTrials.gov. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019;53(3):307–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479018782885.

Kuhn M, Letunic I, Jensen LJ, Bork P. The SIDER database of drugs and side effects. Nucl Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):1075–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1075.

Wishart DS, Feunang YD, Guo AC, Lo EJ, Marcu A, Grant JR, Sajed T, Johnson D, Li C, Sayeeda Z, et al. DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018. Nucl Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):1074–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1037.

Faraone SV, Asherson P, Banaschewski T, Biederman J, Buitelaar JK, Ramos-Quiroga JA, Rohde LA, Sonuga-Barke EJ, Tannock R, Franke B. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.20.

Asherson P, Buitelaar J, Faraone SV, Rohde LA. Adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: key conceptual issues. Lancet Psychiatr. 2016;3(6):568–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30032-3.

Riglin L, Leppert B, Langley K, Thapar AK, O’Donovan MC, Davey Smith G, Stergiakouli E, Tilling K, Thapar A. Investigating attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder traits in the general population: what happens in adult life? J Child Psychol Psychiatr. 2021;62(4):449–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13297.

Arnold LE, Hodgkins P, Kahle J, Madhoo M, Kewley G. Long-term outcomes of ADHD: academic achievement and performance. J Atten Disord. 2020;24(1):73–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054714566076.

Cook J, Knight E, Hume I, Qureshi A. The self-esteem of adults diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a systematic review of the literature. ADHD. 2014;6(4):249–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12402-014-0133-2.

Adamou M, Arif M, Asherson P, Aw T-C, Bolea B, Coghill D, Guðjónsson G, Halmøy A, Hodgkins P, Müller U, et al. Occupational issues of adults with ADHD. BMC Psychiatr. 2013;13(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-13-59.

Dalsgaard S, Østergaard SD, Leckman JF, Mortensen PB, Pedersen MG. Mortality in children, adolescents, and adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a nationwide cohort study. The Lancet. 2015;385(9983):2190–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61684-6.

Malkov YA, Yashunin DA. Efficient and robust approximate nearest neighbor search using hierarchical navigable small world graphs. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2020;42(4):824–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2889473.

Boytsov L, Naidan B. Engineering efficient and effective non-metric space library. In: Brisaboa, N.R., Pedreira, O., Zezula, P. (eds.) Similarity Search and Applications - 6th International Conference, SISAP 2013, Proceedings. LNCS, vol. 8199, Springer; 2013. p. 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41062-8_28

Omar M, Baryannis G. Semi-automated development of conceptual models from natural language text. Data Knowl Eng. 2020;127: 101796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2020.101796.

Aronson AR, Lang F-M. An overview of metamap: historical perspective and recent advances. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(3):229–36. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2009.002733.

Lee J, Yoon W, Kim S, Kim D, Kim S, So CH, Kang J. BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(4):1234–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz682.

Neumann M, King D, Beltagy I, Ammar W. ScispaCy: Fast and robust models for biomedical natural language processing. In: Proceedings of the 18th BioNLP Workshop and Shared Task, pp. 319–327. Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy. 2019. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-5034

Katzman MA, Bilkey TS, Chokka PR, Fallu A, Klassen LJ. Adult ADHD and comorbid disorders: clinical implications of a dimensional approach. BMC Psychiatr. 2017;17(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1463-3.

Gao Y, Baptista-Hon DT, Zhang K. The inevitable transformation of medicine and research by large language models: the possibilities and pitfalls. MedComm-Future Med. 2023;2(2):49.

Li H, Moon JT, Purkayastha S, Celi LA, Trivedi H, Gichoya JW. Ethics of large language models in medicine and medical research. Lancet Digit Health. 2023;5(6):333–5.

Li J, Cheng X, Zhao WX, Nie J-Y, Wen J-R. Helma: A large-scale hallucination evaluation benchmark for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11747. 2023.

Pan S, Luo L, Wang Y, Chen C, Wang J, Wu X. Unifying large language models and knowledge graphs: A roadmap. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.08302. 2023.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Health Information Science and Systems

Tập 11

1-13

Thông tin tác giả