ACCEPTING THE STANDARDIZED PRECIPITATION INDEX: A CALCULATION ALGORITHM1

Journal of the American Water Resources Association - Tập 35 Số 2 - Trang 311-322 - 1999
Nathaniel B. Guttman1
1National Climatic Data Center, 151 Patton Ave., Asheville, North Carolina 28801–5001 (E‐Mail: [email protected]).

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACT: The Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) has been calculated for about 30 years as a means of providing a single measure of meteorological drought severity. It was intended to retrospectively look at wet and dry conditions using water balance techniques. The Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) is a probability index that was developed to give a better representation of abnormal wetness and dryness than the Palmer indices. Before the user community will accept the SPI as an alternative to the Palmer indices, a standard method must be developed for computing the index. Standardization is necessary so that all users of the index will have a common basis for both spatial and temporal comparison of index values. If different probability distributions and models are used to describe an observed series of precipitation, then different SPI values may be obtained. This article describes the effect on the SPI values computed from different probability models as well as the effects on dry event characteristics. It is concluded that the Pearson Type III distribution is the “best” universal model, and that the reliability of the SPI is sample size dependent. It is also concluded that because of data limitations, SPIs with time scales longer than 24 months may be unreliable. An internet link is provided that will allow users to access Fortran 77 source code for calculating the SPI.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<1100:TPDSIL>2.0.CO;2

10.1111/j.1752-1688.1991.tb01478.x

10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<2309:TUOLMI>2.0.CO;2

10.1175/1520-0442(1994)007<1026:OTSOSL>2.0.CO;2

Guttman N. B., 1997, Comparing the Palmer Drought Index and the Standardized Precipitation Index, J. Amer. Water Resources Assn., 34, 113, 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05964.x

10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<2326:RPQVFT>2.0.CO;2

10.1111/j.1752-1688.1992.tb04022.x

Heddinghaus T. B., 1991, A Review of the Palmer Drought Severity Index and Where Do We Go From Here?, 242

10.1017/CBO9780511529443

10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<1356:SSCODD>2.0.CO;2

Karl T. R., 1986, The Sensitivity of the Palmer Drought Severity Index and Palmer's Z‐Index to Their Calibration Coefficients Including Potential Evapotranspiration, J. Clim. Appl. Meteor., 25, 77, 10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025<0077:TSOTPD>2.0.CO;2

Kite G. W., 1988, Frequency and Risk Analyses in Hydrology, 257

McKee T. B., 1993, The Relationship of Drought Frequency and Duration to Time Scales, 179

McKee T. B., 1995, Drought Monitoring with Multiple Time Scales, 233

Palmer W. C., 1965, Meteorological Drought, 58

Teqnical Services, 1997, National Electronic Drought Alias