A systematic review and summarization of the recommendations and research surrounding Curriculum-Based Measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM-R) decision rules

*Allinder, 1998, Curriculum-based measurement, 106 American Educational Research Association, 1999 *Ardoin, 2006, The response in response to intervention: Evaluating the utility of assessing maintenance of intervention effects, Psychology in the Schools, 43, 713, 10.1002/pits.20181 Ardoin, 2004, Examining the incremental benefits of administering a maze and three versus one curriculum-based measurement reading probe when conducting universal screening, School Psychology Review, 33, 218, 10.1080/02796015.2004.12086244 Ardoin, 2008, Evaluating curriculum-based measurement slope estimates using data from tri-annual universal screenings, School Psychology Review, 37, 109, 10.1080/02796015.2008.12087912 *Ardoin, 2009, Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Estimates of standard error when monitoring progress using alternate passage sets, School Psychology Review, 38, 266, 10.1037/h0100646 *Ardoin, 2008, Evaluating curriculum-based measurement from a behavioral assessment perspective, The Behavior Analyst Today, 9, 36, 10.1037/h0100646 *Baker, 1995, Curriculum-based measurement of English reading with bilingual Hispanic students: A validation study with second-grade students, School Psychology Review, 24, 561, 10.1080/02796015.1995.12085788 *Bradley-Klug, 1998, Evaluation of oral reading rate as a curriculum-based measure with literature-based curriculum, Journal of School Psychology, 36, 183, 10.1016/S0022-4405(98)00004-1 *Brown-Chidsey, 2005 *Burns, 2008 *Busch, 2007, Progress monitoring in reading: Using curriculum-based measurement in a response-to-intervention model, Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 223, 10.1177/15345084070320040401 *Christ, 2006, Short term estimates of growth using curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: Estimates of standard error of the slope to construct confidence intervals, School Psychology Review, 35, 128, 10.1080/02796015.2006.12088006 Christ, 2009, Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Passage equivalence and probe-set development, Journal of School Psychology, 47, 55, 10.1016/j.jsp.2008.09.004 Christ, 2012, Curriculum-Based Measurement of oral reading: Quality of progress monitoring outcomes, Exceptional Children, 78, 356, 10.1177/001440291207800306 Christ, 2013, Curriculum-Based Measurement of Oral Reading: Multi-study evaluation of schedule, duration, and dataset quality on progress monitoring outcomes, Journal of School Psychology, 51, 19, 10.1016/j.jsp.2012.11.001 *Clarke, 2009, Using curriculum-based measurement to improve achievement, Principal, 88, 30 *Deno, 1985, Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative, Exceptional Children, 52, 219, 10.1177/001440298505200303 *Deno, 1986, Formative evaluation of individual student programs. A new role for school psychologist, School Psychology Review, 15, 358, 10.1080/02796015.1986.12085239 *Deno, 2003, Developments in curriculum-based measurement, Journal of Special Education, 37, 184, 10.1177/00224669030370030801 *Deno, 2005, Problem solving assessment, 10 *Deno, 1987, Developing curriculum-based measurement systems for data-based special education problem solving, Focus on Exceptional Children, 19, 1 *Deno, 2001, Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities, School Psychology Review, 30, 507, 10.1080/02796015.2001.12086131 *Deno, 1982, Identifying valid measures of reading, Exceptional Children, 49, 36, 10.1177/001440298204900105 *Deno, 1984, How to write effective data-based IEPs, Teaching Exceptional Children, 16, 99, 10.1177/004005998401600205 *Deno, 2009, Developing a school-wide progress-monitoring system, Psychology in the Schools, 46, 44, 10.1002/pits.20353 DIBELS Training Institute *Dunn, 2002, Curriculum-based measurement in reading: A comparison of similar versus challenging material, School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 24, 10.1521/scpq.17.1.24.19904 *Francis, 2008, Form effects on the estimation of students' oral reading fluency using DIBELS, Journal of School Psychology, 746, 315, 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.003 *Fuchs, 1986, Monitoring the performance of mildly handicapped students: Review of current practice and research, Remedial and Special Education, 7, 5, 10.1177/074193258600700503 *Fuchs, 1989, Evaluating solutions: Monitoring progress and revising intervention plans, 153 Fuchs, 2003, Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 172, 10.1111/1540-5826.00073 *Fuchs, 1984, The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on student achievement, pedagogy, and student awareness of learning, American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449, 10.3102/00028312021002449 *Fuchs, 1986, Curriculum-based assessment of progress toward long-term and short-term goals, The Journal of Special Education, 20, 69, 10.1177/002246698602000108 *Fuchs, 1986, Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis, Exceptional Children, 53, 199, 10.1177/001440298605300301 *Fuchs, 1989, Enhancing curriculum-based measurement through computer applications: Review of research and practice, School Psychology Review, 18, 317, 10.3102/00028312021002449 *Fuchs, 2004, Determining adequate yearly progress from kindergarten through grade 6 with curriculum-based measurement, Assessment for Effective Intervention, 29, 25, 10.1177/073724770402900405 Fuchs, 2006, Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?, Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93, 10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4 *Fuchs, 1985, The importance of goal ambitiousness and goal mastery to student achievement, Exceptional Children, 52, 63, 10.1177/001440298505200108 *Fuchs, 1989, Effects of ongoing curriculum-based measurement on student awareness of goals and progress, Education and Treatment of Children, 12, 63 *Fuchs, 1989, Effects of alternative goal structures within curriculum-based measurement, Exceptional Children, 55, 429, 10.1177/001440298505200108 *Fuchs, 1989, Effects of instrumental use of currirculum-based measurement to enhance instructional programs, Remedial and Special Education, 10, 43, 10.1177/001440298905500506 *Fuchs, 1989, Monitoring reading growth using student recalls: Effects of two teacher feedback systems, Journal of Educational Research, 83, 103, 10.1080/00220671.1989.10885938 *Fuchs, 1989, Effects of curriculum-based measurement on teachers' instructional planning, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 51, 10.1080/00220671.1989.10885938 *Fuchs, 1990, Curriculum-based measurement: A standardized long-term goal approach to monitoring student progress, Academic Therapy, 25, 615, 10.1177/105345129002500508 *Fuchs, 1992, Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement using a reading maze task, Exceptional Children, 58, 436, 10.1177/001440299205800507 *Fuchs, 1993, Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much can we expect?, School Psychology Review, 22, 27, 10.1080/02796015.1993.12085636 Fuchs, 2003, Identifying children at risk for reading failure: Curriculum-based measurement and the dual-discrepancy approach, 431 *Good, 2002 *Good, 1990, Forecasting accuracy of slope estimates for reading curriculum-based measurement: Empirical evidence, Behavioral Assessment, 12, 179 *Good, 2001, The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes, Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257, 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_4 *Good, 2002 *Graney, 2008, General education teacher judgments of their low-performing students' short-term reading progress, Psychology in the Schools, 45, 537, 10.1002/pits.20322 *Graney, 2005, Effects of reading curriculum-based measurement (R-CBM) teacher feedback in general education classrooms, School Psychology Review, 34, 184, 10.1080/02796015.2005.12086282 *Graves, 2005, Formatively evaluating the reading progress of first-grade English learners in multiple-language classrooms, Remedial & Special Education, 26, 215, 10.1177/07419325050260040401 *Green, 2001, Use of CBM oral reading in the general education classroom, Assessment for Effective Intervention, 26, 1, 10.1177/073724770102600301 Gregg, 2004, The use of curriculum based measurement by school psychologists, Journal of Psychological Practice, 10, 25 Gresham, 2002, Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to identification of learning disabilities, 467 *Griffiths, 2009, Progress monitoring in oral reading fluency within the context of RTI, School Psychology Review, 24, 13, 10.1037/a0015435 *Hasbrouck, 1992, Curriculum-based oral reading fluency norms for students in grades 2 through 5, Teaching Exceptional Children, 24, 41, 10.1177/004005999202400310 *Hasbrouck, 1999, One teacher's use of curriculum-based measurement: A changed opinion, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 118, 10.1207/sldrp1402_5 Hayes, 1986, Evaluating the quality of behavioral assessment, 463 *Hintze, 2004, An examination of variability as a function of passage variance in CBM progress monitoring, School Psychology Review, 33, 204, 10.1080/02796015.2004.12086243 *Hintze, 2006, Curriculum-based assessment, Psychology in the Schools, 43, 45, 10.1002/pits.20128 *Hintze, 1997, Curriculum-based measurement and literature-based readings: Is curriculum-based measurement meeting the needs of changing reading curricula?, Journal of School Psychology, 35, 351, 10.1016/S0022-4405(97)00014-9 Hintze, 1997, Oral reading fluency and authentic reading material: Criterion validity of the technical features of CBM survey-level assessment, School Psychology Review, 26, 535, 10.1080/02796015.1997.12085885 *Hintze, 1998, An investigation of the effects of passage difficulty level on outcomes of oral reading fluency progress monitoring, School Psychology Review, 27, 433, 10.1080/02796015.1998.12085928 *Hintze, 1994, The effects of curriculum on the sensitivity of curriculum-based measurement in reading, The Journal of Special Education, 28, 188, 10.1177/002246699402800205 Hintze, 2005, A longitudinal examination of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive validity of R-CBM and high-stakes testing, School Psychology Review, 34, 372, 10.1080/02796015.2005.12086292 *Hosp, 2003, Curriculum-based measurement for reading, math, and spelling: How to do it and why, Prevention School Failure, 48, 10, 10.1080/1045988X.2003.10871074 Hosp, 2007 Howe Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 2004 Institute for Education Sciences, 2009 *Jenkins, 2009, Estimating reading growth using intermittent CBM progress monitoring, Exceptional Children, 75, 151, 10.1177/001440290907500202 *Jenkins, 2007, Using CBM-reading assessments to monitor progress, Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 33, 11 *Johnson, 2006 Marston, 1989, A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it, 18 *Marston, 1992, Monitoring pupil progress in reading, Preventing School Failure, 36, 21, 10.1080/1045988X.1992.9944265 *Marston, 1985, Implementing curriculum-based measurement in special and regular education settings, Exceptional Children, 52, 266, 10.1177/001440298505200307 *Marston, 1988, Curriculum-based measurement: District level implementation, 137 *Marston, 1984, Curriculum-based measurement: An alternative to traditional screening, referral, and identification, Journal of Special Education, 18, 109, 10.1177/002246698401800204 Marston, 2007, Historical perspectives and current trends in problem solving: The Minneapolis Story, 265 *Marston, 1996, Best practices in performance monitoring Martens, 2010, Disruptive behavior problems, 157 *McCurdy, 1992, A comparison of teacher-, peer-, and self-monitoring with curriculum-based measurement in reading among students with learning disabilities, Journal of Special Education, 26, 162, 10.1177/002246699202600203 *McDougal, 2010 *McMaster, 2002, Monitoring the academic progress of children who are unresponsive to generally effective early reading intervention, Assessment for Effective Intervention, 27, 23, 10.1177/073724770202700404 Mercer, 2000, Effects of a reading fluency intervention for middle schoolers with specific learning disabilities, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 179, 10.1207/SLDRP1504_2 National Center on Student Progress Monitoring, 2003 *Parker, 1992, Estimating trend in progress monitoring data: A comparison of simple line-fitting methods, School Psychology Review, 21, 300, 10.1080/02796015.1992.12085616 *Plasencia-Pienado, 2000, Assessing students with emotional and behavioral disorders using curriculum-based measurement, Assessment for Effective Intervention, 26, 59, 10.1177/073724770002600108 Poncy, 2005, An investigation of the reliability and standard error of measurement of words read correctly per minute using curriculum-based measurement, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 326, 10.1177/073428290502300403 *Powell-Smith, 2001, Another look at the “C” in CBM: Does it really matter if curriculum-based measurement reading probes are curriculum-based?, Psychology in the Schools, 38, 299, 10.1002/pits.1020 *Powell-Smith, 1998, The use of curriculum-based measurement in the reintegration of the students with mild disabilities, 254 Reschly, 2009, Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence, Journal of School Psychology, 47, 427, 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.07.001 *Riley-Heller, 2005, Curriculum-based measurement: Generic vs. curriculum-dependent probes, Journal of Applied School Psychology, 21, 141, 10.1300/J370v21n01_07 *Scott, 2003, Curriculum-based measurement for reading progress, Intervention in School & Clinic, 38, 153, 10.1177/10534512030380030401 *Shapiro, 2004 *Shapiro, 2009, A conceptual model for evaluating system effects of response to intervention, Assessment for Effective Intervention, 35, 3, 10.1177/1534508408330080 *Shinn *Shinn, 2002, Best practices in using curriculum-based measurement in a problem-solving model, 671 *Shinn, 2005, Identifying and validating academic problems in a problem solving model, 219 *Shinn, 2007, Identifying students at risk, monitoring performance, and determining eligibility within response to intervention: Research on educational need and benefit from academic intervention, School Psychology Review, 36, 601, 10.1080/02796015.2007.12087920 *Shinn, 1998, Curriculum-based measurement and its use in a problem-solving model with students from minority backgrounds, 143 *Shinn, 1989, Varying the difficulty of testing materials: Implications for curriculum-based measurement, Journal of Special Education, 23, 223, 10.1177/002246698902300208 *Shinn, 1989, Summarizing trend in student achievement: A comparison of methods, School Psychology Review, 18, 356, 10.1080/02796015.1989.12085432 *Shinn, 1992, Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading, School Psychology Review, 21, 459, 10.1080/02796015.1992.12085629 *Shinn, 1992, Curriculum-based measurement and problem-solving assessment: Basic procedures and outcomes, Focus on Exceptional Children, 24, 1 *Shinn, M. R., & Langell, L. A. (n.d.). Progress monitoring: Strategies for writing individual goals in general curriculum and more frequent formative evaluation. Retrieved from http://langell.org/handouts/PMPres6pp.ppt.pdf. Shinn, 1985, Differentiating mildly handicapped, low-achieving, and regular education students: A curriculum-based approach, Remedial and Special Education, 6, 31, 10.1177/074193258500600207 *Shinn, 2002, Using curriculum-based measurement in general education classrooms to promote reading success, 113 2010 Shinn, 1986, A comparison of differences between students labeled learning disabled and low achieving on measures of classroom performance, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 545, 10.1177/002221948601900906 *Shriner, 2009, Assessment and students with EBD, 45 Silberglitt, 2005, Formative assessment using CBM-R cut scores to track progress toward success on state mandated achievement tests: A comparison of methods, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 304, 10.1177/073428290502300402 Skiba, 1989, Influence of trend estimation and subject familiarity on practitioners' judgments of intervention effectiveness, Journal of Special Education, 22, 433, 10.1177/002246698902200405 *Skiba, 1986, Characteristics of time-series data collected through curriculum-based reading measurement, Diagnostique, 12, 3, 10.1177/073724778601200101 Speece, 2001, Classification in context: An alternative to identifying early reading disability, Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 735, 10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.735 *Stecker, 2000, Effecting superior achievement using curriculum-based measurement: The importance of individual progress monitoring, Learning Disabilities. Research & Practice, 15, 128, 10.1207/SLDRP1503_2 *Stecker *Stecker, 2005, Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research, Psychology in the Schools, 42, 795, 10.1002/pits.20113 *Stecker *Stecker, 2008, Using progress-monitoring data to improve instructional decision making, Preventing School Failure, 52, 48, 10.3200/PSFL.52.2.48-58 *Tindal, 1985, Empirical validation of criterion-referenced tests, Journal of Educational Research, 78, 203, 10.1080/00220671.1985.10885601 *VanDerHeyden, 2005, The emergence and possible futures of response to intervention, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 339, 10.1080/00220671.1985.10885601 *Wayman, 2007, Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading, The Journal of Special Education, 41, 85, 10.1177/00224669070410020401 *Wesson, 1991, Curriculum-based measurement and two models of follow-up consultation, Exceptional Children, 57, 246, 10.1177/001440299105700307 White, 1980, 10.1177/001440299105700307 *Wright, J. (n.d.). Curriculum-based measurement: A manual for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.jimwrightonline.com/pdfdocs/cbaManual.pdf. *Wright, 2006, Kids in the tutor seat: Building schools' capacity to help struggling readers through a cross-age peer-tutoring program, Psychology in the Schools, 43, 99, 10.1002/pits.20133 *Yell, 2003, Developing legally correct and educationally meaningful IEPs using curriculum-based measurement, Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28, 73