A state-by-state comparison of middle school science standards on evolution in the United States
Tóm tắt
The focus of this study is a state-by-state comparison of middle school science standards on evolution in the United States. In 2009, Louise Mead and Anton Mates reviewed the high school science standards on evolution, giving each state a grade based on multiple factors including the number of times the word “evolution” is mentioned, the types of evolution covered, and the inclusion of creationist jargon (Mead and Mates in Evol Educ Outreach 2:359, 2009). Their study was a replication of an earlier one completed in 2000 by Lawrence Lerner and the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation (Lerner in Good science, bad science: teaching evolution in the states. Thomas Fordham Foundation, Washington, 2000). Mead and Mates indicated that, on average, the quality of the standards had increased over the decade between studies. This study concludes that this positive trend is now evident in the middle school science standards across the nation. We propose that early evolutionary education will be an excellent indicator of future acceptance of evolution across the United States and strongly encourage that evolution be introduced as the underlying theme of biology early in a student’s academic career.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Evolution and climate change in the NGSS. National Center for Science Education. 2013. http://ncse.com/news/2013/04/evolution-climate-change-ngss-0014800. Accessed 30 Sept 2016.
Florida Department of Education. 2016. http://www.fldoe.org/. Accessed 13 July 2017.
Great Schools. 1999. http://greatschools.org/gk/articles/why-are-standards-important/. Accessed 3 May 2016.
Gross PR, Buttrey D, Goodenough U, Koertge N, Lerner L, Schwartz M, Schwartz R. Final evaluation of the next generation science standards. Washington, DC: Thomas B Fordham Institute. 2013. http://edexcellence.net/publications/final-evaluation-of-NGSS.html.
Harris DE, Carr JK. How to use standards in the classroom. Virginia: ASCD; 1996.
Lerner L. Good science, bad science: teaching evolution in the states. Washington: Thomas Fordham Foundation; 2000.
Mead LS, Mates A. Why science standards are important to a strong science curriculum and how states measure up. Evol Educ Outreach. 2009;2:359.
National Research Council. A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2012.
National Research Council. Next generation science standards. 2013. http://www.nextgenscience.org/. Accessed 30 Sept 2016.
Next Generation Science Standards, For States, By States. 2016. http://www.nextgenscience.org/. Accessed 13 July 2017.
Petto AJ, Godfrey LR, editors. Scientists confront intelligent design and creationism. New York; 2008. ISBN: 0-393-05090.
Scott EC. Evolution vs. creationism: an introduction. Berkeley & Los Angeles, California: University of California Press; 2004. ISBN 0-520-24650-0. Retrieved 16 June, 2010. Also: Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-32122-1.