A socio‐economic framework of interpretation and analysis

Emerald - Tập 32 Số 1/2 - Trang 155-173 - 2005
Pieter Keizer1
1Economics Department, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

PurposeEconomics and sociology are two different theoretical disciplines dealing with one and the same subject. The aim of the paper is to integrate the two paradigms into one framework of interpretation and analysis.Design/methodology/approachEconomics is presented as a science that approaches human behaviour being subject to the omni‐present phenomenon of scarcity, assuming rationality and social independence of human actors. Sociology is presented as a science that interprets human behaviour as group behaviour. Groups are motivated to rank one another in terms of status. Integration must take place by relating the two analyses based on these paradigms.FindingsThe basic economic framework is about the relationship between preferences and scarce resources, determining the structure of allocation of goods. The basic sociological framework is about the relationship between the distribution of socially valued goods and the culture that gives goods their social meaning. A socio‐economic framework is about the relation between allocation, distribution, culture and preferences.Originality/valueWhen applying the socio‐economic framework to real‐life phenomena both the economic and the social motives play a role in the explanation, which is not the case in applied economics and applied sociology.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aron, R. (1965), Main Currents in Sociological Thought, Vols 1 and 2, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth. Bauman, Z. and May, T. (1999), Thinking Sociologically, 2nd ed., Blackwell Publishers, Oxford. Beauchamps, T.L. (1991), Philosophical Ethics: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy, 2nd ed., McGraw‐Hill, Maidenhead. Campbell, T. (1981), Seven Theories of Human Society, Clarendon Press, Oxford. Copleston, F. (1985), “The word of Heraclitus”, A History of Philosophy, Volume I: Greece and Rome, Ch. 5, Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, New York, NY. de Cremer, D. (1999), “Trust and fear of exploitation in a public goods dilemma”, Current Psychology, Vol. 18 No. 2. Ekelund, R.B. and Hebert, R.F. (1996), A History of Economic Theory and Method, 4th ed., McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY. Hobbes, T. (1651), Leviathan, Fontana, London. Hodgson, G.M. (1988), Economics and Institutions, A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics, Polity Press, Cambridge. Hodgson, G.M. (1996), Economics and Evolution, Bringing Life Back into Economics, The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI. Homans, G. (1961), Social Behavior, Its Elementary Forms, Routledge, New York, NY. Hume, D. (1751), Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, A. Millar, London. In't Veld, J. (1988), Analyse van organisatieproblemen, 5de druk, Wolters Noordoff, Leiden. Lawson, T. (1997), Economics and Reality, Routledge, New York, NY. Locke, J. (1689), An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, William Tegg, London. Norman, R. (1998), The Moral Philosophers, An Introduction to Ethics, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford. Parsons, T. (1937), The Structure of Social Action, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY. Parsons, T. (1951), The Social System, Free Press, Glencoe, IL. Ritzer, G. (1996), Sociological Theory, 4th ed., McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY. Robbins, L. (1932), An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, Macmillan, London. Schinkel, M.P. (2001), Disequilibrium Theory, Universitaire Pers Maastricht, Maastricht. Smelser, N. and Swedberg, R. (1994), Handbook of Economic Sociology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. Smith, A. (1982), The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, IN, (originally published in 1759). Smith, A. (1994), The Wealth of Nations, The Modern Library, New York, NY, (originally published in 1776). Turner, J.H. (1998), The Structure of Sociological Theory, 6th ed., Wadsworth Publishing, Cincinnati, OH. White, H.C. (1981), “Where do markets come from”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 87 No. 5, pp. 14‐47. Williamson, O.E. (1991), “Strategizing, economizing and economic organization”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12 No. 8, pp. 75‐94. Williamson, O.E. (1996), “Efficiency, power, authority and economic organization”, in Groenewegen, J. (Ed.), TCE and beyond, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, NY. Wolff, J. (1996), An Introduction to Political Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Becker, G.S. and Stigler, G.J. (1977), “De gustibus non est disputandum”, American Economic Review, Vol. 67 No. 2, pp. 76‐90. Collins, R. (1994), Four Sociological Traditions, Oxford University Press, Oxford. de Cremer, D. and Van Vlugt, M. (1999), “Social identification effects in social dilemmas: a transformation of motives”, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 29 No. 7, pp. 871‐93. Hodgson, G.M. (1999), Evolution and Institutions, Routledge, New York, NY. Hollis, M. (1994), The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Kramer, R.M. and Wei, J.C. (1999), “Social uncertainty and the problem of trust in social groups: the social self in doubt”, in Tyler, T.R., Kramer, R.M. and John, O.P. (Eds), The Psychology of the Social Self, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. Sargent, T.J. (1979), Macroeconomic Theory, Academic Press, New York, NY. Sargent, T.J. (1993), Rational Expectations and Inflations, 2nd ed., HarperCollins, College Publishers, New York, NY. Williamson, O.E. (1998), “Transaction cost economics: how it works: where it is headed”, The Economist, Vol. 146 No. 1.