A scoping review of research instruments for measuring student engagement: In need for convergence

Katja Buntins1, Michael Kerres1, Anna Heinemann1
1University of Duisburg-Essen, Learning Lab, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Allen, 2002 Antonenko, 2015, The instrumental value of conceptual frameworks in educational technology research, Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 53, 10.1007/s11423-014-9363-4 Aparicio, 2020, A holistic bibliometric overview of the student engagement research field, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1 Arving, 2014, Registered nurses' thoughts on blended learning in a postgraduate course in cancer care–content analyses of web surveys and a focus group interview, Journal of Cancer Education: The Official Journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 29, 278, 10.1007/s13187-013-0594-6 Ashwin, 2015, The Meanings of Student Engagement: Implications for Policies and Practices, 343 Ben-Eliyahu, 2018, Investigating the multidimensionality of engagement: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement across science activities and contexts, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 87, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.002 Biggs, 2001, The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133, 10.1348/000709901158433 Bond, 2019, Facilitating Student Engagement through Educational Technology: Towards a Conceptual Framework, Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2019, 10.5334/jime.528 Bond, 2020, Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map, International journal of educational technology in higher education, 17, 1, 10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8 Boudreau, 2001, Validation in Information Systems Research: A State-of-the-Art Assessment, MIS Quarterly, 25, 1, 10.2307/3250956 Buchner, 2021, A Systematic Map of Research Characteristics in Studies on Augmented Reality and Cognitive Load, Computers and Education Open, 100036 Buntins, 2016, Psychological tests from a (fuzzy-) logical point of view, Quality & Quantity, 50, 2395, 10.1007/s11135-015-0268-z Carini, 2006, Student Engagement and Student Learning: Testing the Linkages, Research in Higher Education, 47, 1, 10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9 Carle, 2009, Psychometric Properties of Three New National Survey of Student Engagement Based Engagement Scales: An Item Response Theory Analysis, Research in Higher Education, 50, 775, 10.1007/s11162-009-9141-z Chen, 2008, Mining interactive social network for recommending appropriate learning partners in a Web-based cooperative learning environment Chen, 2001, Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale, Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62, 10.1177/109442810141004 Cocea, 2007, Cross-System Validation of Engagement Prediction from Log Files, 14 Cortina, 1993, What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98, 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 Cronbach, 1951, Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika, 16, 297, 10.1007/BF02310555 Cronbach, 1955, Construct validity in psychological tests, Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281, 10.1037/h0040957 Darr, 2012, Measuring Student Engagement: The Development of a Scale for Formative Use, 707 Dennis, 2014, A Replication Manifesto, AIS Transactions on Replication Research, 1, 1, 10.17705/1atrr.00001 Du, 2016, African American female students in online collaborative learning activities: The role of identity, emotion, and peer support, Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 948, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.021 Eccles, J. S. (2016). Engagement: Where to next?Learning and Instruction, 43, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.003 Fredricks, 2004, School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence, Review of Educational Research, 74, 59, 10.3102/00346543074001059 Fredricks, 2016, Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues, Learning and Instruction, 43, 1, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002 Fredricks, 2012, The Measurement of Student Engagement: A Comparative Analysis of Various Methods and Student Self-report Instruments, 763 Gunuc, 2015, Student engagement scale: development, reliability and validity, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40, 587, 10.1080/02602938.2014.938019 Henrie, 2018, Exploring the potential of LMS log data as a proxy measure of student engagement, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 344, 10.1007/s12528-017-9161-1 Henrie, 2015, Exploring intensive longitudinal measures of student engagement in blended learning, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16, 10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2015 Henrie, 2015, Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review, Computers & Education, 90, 36, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005 Hepplestone, 2011, Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: a literature review, Research in Learning Technology, 19, 10.3402/rlt.v19i2.10347 Kahu, 2013, Framing student engagement in higher education, Studies in Higher Education, 38, 758, 10.1080/03075079.2011.598505 Kahu, 2018, Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success, Higher Education Research & Development, 37, 58, 10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197 Karabulut-Ilgu, 2018, A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education, British Journal of Educational Technology, 49, 398, 10.1111/bjet.12548 Keller, 2010 Kim, 2009, Validation of psychometric research instruments: The case of information science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 1178, 10.1002/asi.21066 Korbach, 2018, Differentiating Different Types of Cognitive Load: a Comparison of Different Measures, Educational Psychology Review, 30, 503, 10.1007/s10648-017-9404-8 Kuh, G. D. (2001). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Leslie, 2015, Enhancing the online learning experience using virtual interactive classrooms, Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, the, 32, 22 Lin, 2019, The impact of student engagement on learning outcomes in a cyber-flipped course, Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 1573, 10.1007/s11423-019-09698-9 Lin, 2018, Assessing College Student Engagement: Development and Validation of the Student Course Engagement Scale, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36, 694, 10.1177/0734282917697618 Ling, 2010, The Reasons for Encouraging or Inhibiting Students’ Active Participation in Asynchronous Online Discussion: Three Cases from Malaysia, International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5 Lu, 2014, The effect of social interaction on learning engagement in a social networking environment, Interactive Learning Environments, 22, 401, 10.1080/10494820.2012.680966 Luszczynska, 2005, The general self-efficacy scale: Multicultural validation studies, The Journal of Psychology, 139, 439, 10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457 Mameli, 2017, Measuring four-dimensional engagement in school: A validation of the Student Engagement Scale and of the Agentic Engagement Scale. TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 527 Marshall, 2002, The Index of Cognitive Activity: measuring cognitive workload Mazer, 2013, Validity of the Student Interest and Engagement Scales: Associations with Student Learning Outcomes, Communication Studies, 64, 125, 10.1080/10510974.2012.727943 McCormick, 2013, Student Engagement: Bridging Research and Practice to Improve the Quality of Undergraduate Education, 47, 10.1007/978-94-007-5836-0_2 McCredie, 2019, Convergence between Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) and self-report: Another look at some old questions, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75, 1838, 10.1002/jclp.22826 Mokhtari, 2002, Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies, Journal of Developmental Education, 25, 2 Motz, 2019, The validity and utility of activity logs as a measure of student engagement, 300 Müller, 2018, Student Engagement, Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 21, 649, 10.1007/s11618-017-0799-2 Nkomo, 2021, Synthesis of student engagement with digital technologies: a systematic review of the literature, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, 34 Paas, 2003, Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory, Educational Psychologist, 38, 63, 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8 Park, 2015, Examining Learning Experience in Two Online Courses Using Web Logs and Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Pianta, 2012, Teacher-Student Relationships and Engagement: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Improving the Capacity of Classroom Interactions, 365 Pike, 2011, If and When Money Matters: The Relationships Among Educational Expenditures, Student Engagement and Students’ Learning Outcomes, Research in Higher Education, 52, 81, 10.1007/s11162-010-9183-2 Pike, 2012, The Mediating Effects of Student Engagement on the Relationships Between Academic Disciplines and Learning Outcomes: An Extension of Holland's Theory, Research in Higher Education, 53, 550, 10.1007/s11162-011-9239-y Pintrich, 1993, Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq), Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801, 10.1177/0013164493053003024 Reeve, 2012, A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement, 149 Reeve, 2011, Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002 Reschly, 2012, Jingle, Jangle, and Conceptual Haziness: Evolution and Future Directions of the Engagement Construct, 3 Robinson, 2008, New Benchmarks in Higher Education: Student Engagement in Online Learning, Journal of Education for Business, 84, 101, 10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109 Rovai, 2002, Development of an instrument to measure classroom community, The Internet and Higher Education, 5, 197, 10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00102-1 Sander, P., & Sanders, L. (2003). Measuring confidence in academic study: a summary report. Sharma, 2016, Examining Patterns of Participation and Meaning Making in Student Blogs: A Case Study in Higher Education, American Journal of Distance Education, 30, 2, 10.1080/08923647.2016.1119605 Sherer, 1983, Construct Validation of the Self-Efficacy Scale, Psychological Reports, 53, 899, 10.2466/pr0.1983.53.3.899 Spangler, 1992, Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 140, 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.140 Veiga, 2014, Assessing students’ engagement: A review of instruments with psychometric qualities Wageman, 1995, Interdependence and Group Effectiveness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145, 10.2307/2393703 Wang, 2017, An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in flipped classroom supported by learning management system, Computers & Education, 114, 79, 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.012 Wang, 2016, The Math and Science Engagement Scales: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties, Learning and Instruction, 43, 16, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.008 West, 2015, Beyond the Tweet, Journal of Marketing Education, 37, 160, 10.1177/0273475315586061 Zhoc, 2019, Higher Education Student Engagement Scale (HESES): Development and Psychometric Evidence, Research in Higher Education, 60, 219, 10.1007/s11162-018-9510-6