A scheme for performing strong and weak sequential measurements of non-commuting observables

Aharonov, Y., Albert, D.: Is the usual notion of time evolution adequate for quantum-mechanical systems? Phys. Rev. D 29, 223 (1984). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.29.223. (ISSN 0556–2821) Hofmann, H.F.: Sequential measurements of non-commuting observables with quantum controlled interactions. N. J. Phys. 16, 063056 (2014). doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/6/063056. (ISSN 1367–2630) Diosi, L.: Structural Features of Sequential Weak Measurements. (2015). arXiv:1511.03923 Mermin, N.D.: Hidden variables and the two theorems of John Bell. Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 803–815 (1993). doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.65.803. (ISSN 1539–0756) Hardy, L.: Quantum Mechanics, Local Realistic Theories, and Lorentz-Invariant Realistic Theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2981 (1992). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2981. (ISSN 0031–9007) Aharonov, Y., Botero, A., Popescu, S., Reznik, B., Tollaksen, J.: Revisiting Hardy’s paradox: counterfactual statements, real measurements, entanglement and weak values. Phys. Lett. A 301, 130 (2002). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960102009866 Guhne, O., Kleinmann, M., Cabello, A., Larsson, J.-A., Kirchmair, G., Zahringer, F., Gerritsma, R., Roos, C.F.: Compatibility and noncontextuality for sequential measurements. Phys. Rev. A 81 (2010). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.81.022121. (ISSN 1094–1622) Kochen, S., Specker, E.P.: The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics. The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics, pp. 293–328. Springer, Dordrecht (1975). doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1795-4_17 Pusey, M.F.: Anomalous Weak Values Are Proofs of Contextuality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014).doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.200401. (ISSN 1079–7114) Leggett, A.J., Garg, A.: Quantum mechanics versus macroscopic realism: Is the flux there when nobody looks? Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 857–860 (1985). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.857. (ISSN 0031–9007) Williams, N.S., Jordan, A.N.: Weak Values and the Leggett-Garg Inequality in Solid-State Qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 026804 (2008). http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v100/i2/e026804 Marcovitch, S., Reznik, B.: Testing Bell inequalities with weak measurements. (2010). arXiv:1005.3236 Goggin, M.E., Almeida, M.P., Barbieri, M., Lanyon, B.P., O’Brien, J.L., White, A.G., Pryde, G.J.: Violation of the Leggett-Garg inequality with weak measurements of photons. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1256 (2011). http://www.pnas.org/content/108/4/1256.short Dressel, J., Broadbent, C.J., Howell, J.C., Jordan, A.N.: Experimental Violation of Two-Party Leggett-Garg Inequalities with Semiweak Measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 040402 (2011). http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.040402 Suzuki, Y., Linuma, M., Hofmann, H.F.: Violation of Leggett–Garg inequalities in quantum measurements with variable resolution and back-action. New. N. J. Phys. 14, 103022 (2012). http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/14/10/103022/meta Groen, J.P. et al.: Partial-Measurement Backaction and Nonclassical Weak Values in a Superconducting Circuit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 090506 (2013). http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.090506 White, T.C., Mutus, J.Y., Dressel, J., Kelly, J., Barends, R., Jeffrey, E., Sank, D., Megrant, A., Campbell, B., Chen, Y., et al.: Preserving entanglement during weak measurement demonstrated with a violation of the Bell-Leggett-Garg inequality. NPJ Quantum Inform. 2, bibinfopages15022 (2016). http://www.nature.com/articles/npjqi201522 Katiyar, H., Brodutch, A., Lu, D., Laflamme, R.: Experimental violation of the Leggett-Garg inequality in a 3-level system. (2016). arXiv:1606.07151 Nagali, E., Felicetti, S., de Assis, P.-L., D’Ambrosio, V., Filip, R., Sciarrino, F.: Testing sequential quantum measurements: how can maximal knowledge be extracted? Sci. Rep. 2 (2012). doi:10.1038/srep00443. (ISSN 2045–2322) Aharonov, Y., Bergmann, P.G., Lebowitz, J.L.: Time Symmetry in the Quantum Process of Measurement. Phys. Rev. 134, B1410 (1964). http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v134/i6B/pB1410_1 Aharonov, Y., Vaidman, L.: The Two-State Vector Formalism: An Updated Review. Lect. Notes Phys. 734, 399–447 (2007). http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-540-73473-4_13.pdf Aharonov, Y., Rohrlich, D.: Quantum Paradoxes Quantum Theory for the Perplexed. Wiley-VCH, New York (2005). (ISBN 3527403914) Aharonov, Y., Albert, D.Z., Vaidman, L.: How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1351 (1988). http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v60/i14/p1351_1 Duck, I., Stevenson, P., Sudarshan, E.: The sense in which a “weak measurement” of a spin-1/2 particle’s spin component yields a value 100. Phys. Rev. D 40, 2112 (1989). http://prd.aps.org/abstract/PRD/v40/i6/p2112_1 Ritchie, N., Story, J., Hulet, R.G.: Realization of a measurement of a “weak value”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1107 (1991). http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v66/i9/p1107_1 Aharonov, Y., Cohen, E., Ben-Moshe, S.: Unusual Interactions of Pre-and-Post-Selected Particles. EPJ Web Conf. 70, 00053 (2014). http://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/abs/2014/07/epjconf_icfp2012_00053/epjconf_icfp2012_00053.html Mitchison, G., Jozsa, R., Popescu, S.: Sequential weak measurement. Phys. Rev. A 76, 062105 (2007). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.76.062105 Mitchison, G.: Weak measurement takes a simple form for cumulants. Phys. Rev. A 77, 052102 (2009). http://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.77.052102 Aberg, J., Mitchison, G.: Cumulants and the moment algebra: Tools for analyzing weak measurements. J. Math. Phys. 50, 042103 (2009). http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jmp/50/4/10.1063/1.3093270 Piacentini, F., et al.: Measuring incompatible observables of a single photon. (2015). arXiv:1508.03220 Glick, J.R., Adami, C.: Quantum Mechanics of Consecutive Measurements. (2016). arXiv:0911.1142 Brodutch, A., Cohen, E.: Nonlocal Measurements via Quantum Erasure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 070404 (2016). http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.070404 Kocsis, S., Braverman, B., Ravets, S., Stevens, M.J., Mirin, R.P., Shalm, L.K., Steinberg, A.M.: Observing the Average Trajectories of Single Photons in a Two-Slit Interferometer. Science 332, 1170 (2011). http://www.sciencemag.org/content/332/6034/1170.short Vaidman, L.: Past of a quantum particle. Phys. Rev. A 87, 052104 (2013). http://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.052104 Vaidman, L.: Tracing the past of a quantum particle. Phys. Rev. A 89, 024102 (2014). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.89.024102. (ISSN 1094–1622) Danan, A., Farfurnik, D., Bar-Ad, S., Vaidman, L.: Asking Photons Where They Have Been. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 240402 (2013). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.240402. (ISSN 1079–7114) Li, Z.H., Al-Amri, M., Shuail, M.S.: Comment on “Past of a quantum particle”. Phys. Rev. A 88, 046102 (2013). http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.046102 Vaidman, L.: Reply to “Comment on ‘Past of a quantum particle”’. Phys. Rev. A 88, 046103 (2013). http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.046103 Saldanha, P.: Interpreting a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer with classical optics. Phys. Rev. A 89, 033825 (2014). http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.033825 Bartkiewicz, K., Černoch, A., Javůrek, D., Lemr, K., Soubusta, J., Jiří, J.: One-state vector formalism for the evolution of a quantum state through nested Mach-Zehnder interferometers. Phys. Rev. A 91, 012103 (2015). http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.91.012103 Potoček, V., Ferenczi, G.: Which-way information in a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Phys. Rev. A 92, 012103 (2015). http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.023829 Vaidman, L.: Comment on “One-state vector formalism for the evolution of a quantum state through nested Mach-Zehnder interferometers”. (2015). arXiv:1508.07614 Vaidman, L.: Comment on “Which-way information in a nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer”. (2015). arXiv:1509.02388 Aharonov, Y., Vaidman, L.: Complete description of a quantum system at a given time. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 24, 2315 (1991). http://iopscience.iop.org/0305-4470/24/10/018 Hu, M.J. Are observables necessarily Hermitian? (2016). arXiv:1601.04287 Kedem, Y., Vaidman, L.: Modular Values and Weak Values of Quantum Observables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 230401 (2010). http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v105/i23/e230401 Silva, R., Guryanova, Y., Brunner, N., Linden, N., Short, A.J., Popescu, S.: Pre- and postselected quantum states: Density matrices, tomography, and Kraus operators. Phys. Rev. A 89, 012121 (2014). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.89.012121. (ISSN 1094–1622) Brun, T.A., Diósi, L., Strunz, W.T.: Test of weak measurement on a two- or three-qubit computer. Phys. Rev. A 77, 032101 (2008). http://pra.aps.org/abstract/PRA/v77/i3/e032101 Wu, S., Molmer, K.: Weak measurements with a qubit meter. Phys. Lett. A 374, 34 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2009.10.026. (ISSN 0375–9601) Lu, D., Brodutch, A., Li, J., Li, H., Laflamme, R.: Experimental realization of post-selected weak measurements on an NMR quantum processor. New. N. J. Phys. 16, 053015 (2014). http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/16/5/053015 Resch, K., Steinberg, A.: Extracting Joint Weak Values with Local, Single-Particle Measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 130402 (2004). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.130402 Brodutch, A., Vaidman, L.: Measurements of non local weak values. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 174, 012004 (2009). http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/174/1/012004 Brodutch, A.: Weak measurements of non local variables. (2008). arXiv preprint arXiv:0811.1706 Resch, K.J., Lundeen, J.S., Steinberg, A.M.: Experimental realization of the quantum box problem. Phys. Lett. A 324, 125 (2004). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375960104002506 George, R.E., Robledo, L.M., Maroney, O.J.E., Blok, M.S., Bernien, H., Markham, M.L., Twitchen, D.J., Morton, J.J.L., Briggs, G.A.D., Hanson, R.: Opening up three quantum boxes causes classically undetectable wavefunction collapse. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3777–3781 (2013). doi:10.1073/pnas.1208374110. (ISSN 1091–6490) Aharonov, Y., Popescu, S., Rohrlich, D., Skrzypczyk, P.: Quantum Cheshire Cats. New. J. Phys. 15, 113015 (2013). doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/11/113015. (ISSN 1367–2630) Denkmayr, T., Geppert, H., Sponar, S., Lemmel, H., Matzkin, A., Tollaksen, J., Hasegawa, Y.: Observation of a quantum Cheshire Cat in a matter-wave interferometer experiment. Nat. Commun. 5 (2014). doi:10.1038/ncomms5492. (ISSN 2041–1723) Lundeen, J., Steinberg, A.: Experimental Joint Weak Measurement on a Photon Pair as a Probe of Hardy’s Paradox. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 020404 (2009). http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v102/i2/e020404 Aharonov, Y., Nussinov, S., Popescu, S., Vaidman, L.: Peculiar features of entangled states with postselection. Phys. Rev. A 87, 014105 (2012). http://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.87.014105 Salvail, J.Z., Agnew, M., Johnson, A.S., Bolduc, E., Leach, J., Boyd, R.W.: Full characterization of polarization states of light via direct measurement. Nat. Photonics 7, 316–321 (2013). http://www.nature.com/nphoton/journal/v7/n4/abs/nphoton.2013.24.html Dressel, J., Brun, T., Korotkov, A.N.: Implementing generalized measurements with superconducting qubits. Phys. Rev. A 90, 032302 (2014). http://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.032302 Schrödinger, E.: Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 31, 553 (1935). http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1737068&fileId=S0305004100013554 Wiseman, H.M., Jones, S.J., Doherty, A.C.: Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140402 (2007). http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.140402 Kent, A.: A no-summoning theorem in relativistic quantum theory. Quantum Inf. Process. 12, 1023–1032 (2013). http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11128-012-0431-6 Hayden, P., May, A.: Summoning Information in Spacetime, or Where and When Can a Qubit Be? (2012). arXiv:1210.0913