A race beyond the bottom: the nature of bidding for a firm

International Tax and Public Finance - Tập 22 - Trang 452-475 - 2014
Taiji Furusawa1, Kazumi Hori2, Ian Wooton3
1Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, Kunitachi, Japan
2College of Economics, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Japan
3Department of Economics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK

Tóm tắt

We examine how the bidding environment may affect the outcome of tax competition between two countries (or two regions) in attracting a firm’s foreign direct investment (FDI). We compare the equilibrium location choice and payoffs from an English auction, with both complete and incomplete information, relative to those in the traditional setting of a sealed-bid first-price auction. We find that an English auction leads to more aggressive bidding in “race beyond the bottom,” where the nations may bid beyond their own valuations of the FDI. We also discuss the roles of auction protocol and information asymmetry on the auction outcome.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bjorvatn, K., & Eckel, C. (2006). Policy competition for foreign direct investment between asymmetric countries. European Economic Review, 50, 1891–1907. Black, D. A., & Hoyt, W. H. (1989). Bidding for firms. American Economic Review, 79, 1249–1256. Bond, E. W., & Samuelson, L. (1986). Tax holidays as signals. American Economic Review, 76, 820–826. Burkart, M. (1995). Initial shareholdings and overbidding in takeover contests. Journal of Finance, 50, 1491–1515. Chattanooga Times Free Press, 16 July 2008, Chattanooga, TN. www.timesfreepress.com/news/2008/jul/16/chattanooga-vw-incentives-could-top-400-million-ov/. Davies, R. B. (2005). State tax competition for foreign direct investment: A winnable war? Journal of International Economics, 67, 498–512. Dembour, C. (2008). Competition for business location: A survey. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 8, 89–111. Devereux, M. P., Lockwood, B., & Redoano, M. (2008). Do countries compete over corporate tax rates? Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1210–1235. Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R. (1994). Auctions with price-proportional benefits to bidders. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 339–346. Ferrett, B., & Wooton, I. (2010). Tax competition and the international distribution of wwnership: An invariance result. International Tax and Public Finance, 17, 518–531. Fumagalli, C. (2003). On the welfare effects of competition for foreign direct investment. European Economic Review, 47, 963–983. Greenstone, M., & Enrico, M. (2004), Bidding for industrial plants: Does winning a ‘Million Dollar Plant’ increase welfare? NBER Working Paper 9844. Haaland, J. I., & Wooton, I. (1999). International competition for multinational investment. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 101, 631–650. Haaparanta, P. (1996). Competition for foreign direct investments. Journal of Public Economics, 63, 141–153. Haufler, A., & Wooton, I. (1999). Country size and tax competition for foreign direct investment. Journal of Public Economics, 71, 121–139. Jehiel, P., & Moldovanu, B. (1996). Strategic nonparticipation. Rand Journal of Economics, 27, 84–98. Kaplan, T., Luski, I., & Wettstein, D. (2003). Government policy towards multi-national corporations. Economic Bulletin, 6, 1–8. Kempf, H., & Rota-Graziosi, G. (2010). Endogenizing leadership in tax competition. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 768–776. Kessing, S. G., Konrad, K. A., & Kotsogiannis, C. (2009). Federalism, weak institutions and the competition for foreign direct investment. International Tax and Public Finance, 16, 105–123. King, I. R., McAfee, P., & Welling, L. (1993). Industrial Blackmail: Dynamic tax competition and public investment. Canadian Journal of Economics, 26, 590–608. New York Times, October 18, 2002. Ogawa, H. (2013). Further analysis on leadership in tax competition: The role of capital wwnership. International Tax and Public Finance, 20, 474–484. Olsen, T. E., & Osmundsen, P. (2003). Spillovers and international competition for investments. Journal of International Economics, 59, 211–238. Panteghini, P. M., & Schjelderup, G. (2006). To invest or not to invest: A real options approach to FDIs and tax competition. International Tax and Public Finance, 13, 643–660. Press Register, 16 July 2008, Mobile, AL. www.al.com/news/press-register/index.ssf?/base/news/1216262708120070.xml&coll=3. Scoones, D., & Wen, J.-F. (2001). Common and private values of the firm in tax ccompetition. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 3, 373–389. Singh, R. (1998). Takeover bidding with toeholds: The case of the owner’s curse. Review of Financial Studies, 11, 679–704. Wilson, J. D. (1986). A theory of interregional tax competition. Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 296–315. Wilson, J. D. (1999). Theories of tax competition. National Tax Journal, 52, 269–304. Wilson, J. D., & Wildasin, D. E. (2004). Capital tax competition: Bane or boon? Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1065–1091. Zodrow, G. R., & Mieszkowski, P. (1986). Pigou, tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of local public goods. Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 356–370.