A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral uracil, ftorafur, and leucovorin in patients with advanced cancer

Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology - Tập 37 - Trang 581-586 - 1996
N. J. Meropol1, Yousef M. Rustum2, Nicholas J. Petrelli3, Miguel Rodriguez-Bigas3, Cheryl Frank2, Dah H. Ho4, Marilyn Kurowski1, Patrick J. Creaven1
1Division of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA, , US
2Department of Experimental Therapeutics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA, , US
3Division of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA, , US
4University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Houston, TX 77030, USA, , US

Tóm tắt

 A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral uracil, ftorafur, and leucovorin was performed in patients with advanced cancer. Uracil plus ftorafur (UFT) was given in a 4:1 molar ratio in three divided doses for 28 consecutive days. Patient cohorts were treated at 200, 250, 300, and 350 mg/m2 of UFT daily. For all patients, 150 mg of leucovorin was given daily in three oral doses. A 1-week rest period followed each 28-day treatment course. Gastrointestinal toxicity, characterized by diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, was dose-limiting at 350 mg/m2 UFT in patients who had received prior chemotherapy. Mild fatigue and transient hyperbilirubinemia were also common. In previously untreated patients, UFT at 350 mg/m2 was well-tolerated, suggesting this as an acceptable phase II dose in this schedule with leucovorin. Two of eight previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer had partial responses with UFT (350 mg/m2) plus leucovorin. Pharmacokinetic parameters [ftorafur, uracil, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-methyltetrahydrofolate] showed wide interpatient variations. Plasma levels of 5-FU (Cmax 1.4±1.9 μM) were comparable to those achieved with protracted venous infusions, and folate levels (Cmax 6.1±3.6 μM) were sufficient for biochemical modulation. Ongoing study will determine if this convenient oral regimen will compare favorably in terms of efficacy, toxicity, and cost with intravenous fluoropyrimidine programs.