A parametric study of the hydrodynamic roughness produced by a wall coating layer of heavy oil

Elsevier BV - Tập 14 - Trang 155-166 - 2017
S. Rushd1, R. S. Sanders1
1Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

Tóm tắt

In water-lubricated pipeline transportation of heavy oil and bitumen, a thin oil film typically coats the pipe wall. A detailed study of the hydrodynamic effects of this fouling layer is critical to the design and operation of oil–water pipelines, as it can increase the pipeline pressure loss (and pumping power requirements) by 15 times or more. In this study, a parametric investigation of the hydrodynamic effects caused by the wall coating of viscous oil was conducted. A custom-built rectangular flow cell was used. A validated CFD-based procedure was used to determine the hydrodynamic roughness from the measured pressure losses. A similar procedure was followed for a set of pipe loop tests. The effects of the thickness of the oil coating layer, the oil viscosity, and water flow rate on the hydrodynamic roughness were evaluated. Oil viscosities from 3 to 21300 Pa s were tested. The results show that the equivalent hydrodynamic roughness produced by a wall coating layer of viscous oil is dependent on the coating thickness but essentially independent of oil viscosity. A new correlation was developed using these data to predict the hydrodynamic roughness for flow conditions in which a viscous oil coating is produced on the pipe wall.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Andrewartha JM, Sargison JE, Perkins KJ. The influence of freshwater biofilms on drag in hydroelectric power schemes. WSEAS Trans Fluid Mech. 2008;3(3):201–6. ANSYS CFX-Solver Theory Guide. Release 13.0. ANSYS Inc., Southpointe, 275 Technology Drive, Canonsburg, PA 15317. 2010. http://www.ansys.com. Arney MS, Bai R, Guevara E, Joseph DD, Liu K. Friction factor and holdup studies for lubricated pipelining—I. Experiments and correlations. Int. J. Multiph Flow. 1993;19(6):1061–76. doi:10.1016/0301-9322(93)90078-9. Arney MS, Ribeiro GS, Guevara E, Bai R, Joseph DD. Cement-lined pipes for water lubricated transport of heavy oil. Int. J. Multiph Flow. 1996;22(2):207–21. doi:10.1016/0301-9322(95)00064-X. Barton AF, Wallis MR, Sarglson JE, Bula A, Walker GJ. Hydraulic roughness of biofouled pipes, biofilm character, and measured improvements from cleaning. J Hydraul Eng. 2008;134:852–7. Brauer H. Flow resistance in pipes with ripple roughness. Chemische Zeitung (Chemist Review Eng). 1963;87:199–210. Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP). Crude oil, forecast, market and transportation. 2014. http://www.capp.ca. de Andrade THF, Crivelaro KCO, Neto SRdeF, de Lima AGB. Numerical study of heavy oil flow on horizontal pipe lubricated by water. In: Ochsner A, da Silva LFM, Altenbach H, editors. Materials with complex behaviour II, vol. 16., Advanced Structured MaterialsHeidelberg: Springer Berlin; 2012. p. 99–118. Fletcher DF, Geyer PE, Haynes BS. Assessment of the SST and omega-based Reynolds stress models for the prediction of flow and heat transfer in a square-section U-bend. Comput Therm Sci. 2009;1:385–403. doi:10.1615/ComputThermalScien.v1.i4.20. Hart A. A review of technologies for transporting heavy crude oil and bitumen via pipelines. J Pet Explor Prod Technol. 2014;4:327–36. doi:10.1007/s13202-013-0086-6. International Energy Agency (IEA). World energy outlook 2014. www.iea.org. Jones OC Jr. An improvement in calculation of turbulent friction in rectangular ducts. J Fluid Eng-T ASME. 1976;98:173–80. Joseph DD, Bai R, Mata C, Sury K, Grant C. Self-lubricated transport of bitumen froth. J Fluid Mech. 1999;386:127–48. doi:10.1017/S0022112099004413. McKibben MJ, Gillies RG, Shook CA. Predicting pressure gradients in heavy oil-water pipelines. Can J Chem Eng. 2000;78:752–6. doi:10.1002/cjce.5450780418. McKibben M, Gillies R, Rushd S, Sanders RS. A new technique for the scale-up of pilot plant tests of water-lubricated pipeline flows of heavy oil and bitumen. J Petrol Explor. Prod. Technol. 2016. Manuscript submitted for publication (under revision) Nunez GA, Rivas HJ, Joseph DD. Drive to produce heavy crude prompts variety of transportation methods. Oil Gas J. 1998;96(43):59–63. Perry RH, Green DW. Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook. Section 6. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill International Editions; 1997. Picologlou BF, Characklis WG, Zelver N. Biofilm growth and hydraulic performance. J Hydraul Div. 1980;106(5):733–46. Rodriguez OMH, Bannwart AC, de Carvalho CHM. Pressure loss in core-annular flow: modeling, experimental investigation and full-scale experiments. J Pet Sci Eng. 2009;65(1–2):67–75. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2008.12.026. Rushd S, Islam A, Sanders RS. A CFD methodology to determine the hydrodynamic roughness of a surface with application to viscous oil coatings. J. Hydraul Eng. 2016. Manuscript submitted for publication (under revision). Rushd S. A new approach to model friction losses in the water-assisted pipeline transportation of heavy oil and bitumen. PhD thesis, University of Alberta, Canada. 2016. Saniere A, Henaut I, Argillier JF. Pipeline transportation of heavy oils, a strategic, economic and technological challenge. Oil Gas Sci Technol—Rev. IFP. 2004;59:455–66. Schaan J, Sanders RS, Litzenberger C, Gillies RG, Shook CA. Measurement of heat transfer coefficients in pipeline flow of Athabasca bitumen froth. In: Proceedings of 3rd North American conference on multiphase technology, Banff, Canada. BHR Group, Cranfield, UK. 2002:25–38. Shook CA, Gillies RG, Sanders RS. Pipeline hydrotransport with applications in the oil sand industry. SRC Publication No. 11508-1E02. Saskatchewan Research Council Pipeflow Technology Centre, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. 2002. Vuong DH, Zhang HQ, Sarcia C, Li M. Experimental study on high viscosity oil/water flow in horizontal and vertical pipes. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. 4–7 October, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. 2009. doi:10.2118/124542-MS. Whyte FM. Fluid mechanics. 4th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 1999.