A novel approach to explore Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives in in situ simulations—the structured what if functional resonance analysis methodology

Advances in Simulation - Tập 6 - Trang 1-13 - 2021
Ralph James MacKinnon1,2, Karin Pukk-Härenstam1,3, Christopher Kennedy4, Erik Hollnagel5, David Slater6
1Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
2Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK
3Paediatric Emergency Department, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
4Paediatric Emergency Department, Children’s Mercy Hospital Kansas City, Kansas City, USA
5Department of Patient Safety, Jönköping Academy, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden
6Institute of Energy, School of Engineering, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

Tóm tắt

With ever increasingly complex healthcare settings, technology enhanced simulation (TES) is well positioned to explore all perspectives to enhance patient safety and patient outcomes. Analysis from a Safety-II stance requires identification of human adjustments in daily work that are key to maintaining safety. The aim of this paper is to describe an approach to explore the consequences of human variability from a Safety-II perspective and describe the added value of this to TES. The reader is guided through a novel application of functional resonance analysis methodology (FRAM), a method to analyse how a system or activity is affected by human variability, to explore human adaptations observed in in situ simulations (ISS). The structured applicability of this novel approach to TES is described by application to empirical data from the standardised ISS management of paediatric time critical head injuries (TCHI). A case series is presented to illustrate the step-wise observation of key timings during ISSs, the construction of FRAM models and the visualisation of the propagation of human adaptations through the FRAM models. The key functions/actions that ensure the propagation are visible, as are the sequelae of the adaptations. The approach as described in this paper is a first step to illuminating how to explore, analyse and observe the consequences of positive and negative human adaptations within simulated complex systems. This provides TES with a structured methodology to visualise and reflect upon both Safety-I and Safety-II perspectives to enhance patient safety and patient outcomes.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Kolb DA. Experiential Learning : Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.; 1984. Rosen AM, Hunt AE, Pronovost JP, Federowicz AM, Weaver JS. In Situ Simulation in Continuing Education for the Health Care Professions: A Systematic Review. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012;32:243–54. Gaba DM, Howard SK, Fish KJ, Smith BE, Sowb YA. Simulation-Based Training in Anesthesia Crisis Resource Management (ACRM): A Decade of Experience. Simul. Gaming. 2001;32:175–93. Hollnagel E. Coping with complexity: past, present and future. Cogn Technol Work. 2012;14:199–205. Flach J. Complexity: learning to muddle through. Cogn Technol Work. 2012;14:187–97. Hollnagel E WR, Braithwaite J. From Safety-I to Safety -II: A white paper. 2015. https://www.england.nhs.uk/signuptosafety/wpcontent/uploads/sites/16/2015/10/safety-1-safety-2-whte-papr.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2020. Reid JMD, Stone KMD, Huang LMD, S. Deutsch EMD. Simulation for Systems Integration in Pediatric Emergency Medicine. Clin. Pediatr. Emerg. Med. 2016;17:193–9. Dubé MM, Reid J, Kaba A, Cheng A, Eppich W, Grant V, et al. PEARLS for Systems Integration: A Modified PEARLS Framework for Debriefing Systems-Focused Simulations. Simul Healthc. 2019;14:333–42. Holden RJ, Carayon P, Gurses AP, Hoonakker P, Hundt AS, Ozok AA, et al. SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics. 2013;56:1669–86. Adler MD, Mobley BL, Eppich WJ, Lappe M, Green M, Mangold K. Use of simulation to test systems and prepare staff for a new hospital transition. J Patient Saf. 2018;14(3):143–7. Ventre KM, Barry JS, Davis D, Baiamonte AAVL, Wentworth AC, Pietras M, et al. Using In Situ Simulation to Evaluate Operational Readiness of a Children’s Hospital-Based Obstetrics Unit. Simul Healthc. 2014;9:102–11. Patterson MD, Geis GL, Falcone RA, LeMaster T, Wears RL. In situ simulation: Detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:468–77. Geis GL, Pio B, Pendergrass TL, Moyer MR, Patterson MD. Simulation to Assess the Safety of New Healthcare Teams and New Facilities. Simul Healthc. 2011;6:125–33. Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc. 2007;2(2):115–25. Dieckmann P, Patterson M, Lahlou S, Mesman J, Nyström P, Krage R. Variation and adaptation: learning from success in patient safety-oriented simulation training. Adv Simul. (London). 2017;2(1):21. Wears R, Hollnagel E, Braithwaite J. The resilience of everyday clinical work. London: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.; 2015. Braithwaite J, Wears RL, Hollnagel E, editors. Resilient health care: volume 3 : reconciling work-as-imagined and work-as-done. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group USA, 2017. Hollnagel E. FRAM: The functional resonance analysis method, modeling complex socio-technical systems. London: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.; 2013. p.117–8. Hollnagel E. The FRAM Model Interpreter. 2020. https://functionalresonance.com/the-fram-model-interpreter.html. Accessed 7 Nov 2020. Jensen AR, McLaughlin C, Wong CF, McAuliff K, Nathens AB, Barin E, et al. Simulation-based training for trauma resuscitation among ACS TQIP Pediatric centers: Understanding prevalence of use, associated center characteristics, training factors, and implementation barriers. Am J Surg. 2019;217:180–5. Cheng A, Kessler D, MacKinnon R, Chang TP, Nadkarni VM, Hunt EA, et al. Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements. (Report). Adv Simul. 2016;1(1). MacKinnon RJ, Kennedy C, Doherty C, Shepherd M, Cole J, Stenfors-Hayes T. Fitness for purpose study of the Field Assessment Conditioning Tool (FACT): a research protocol. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e006386. The International Network for Simulation-based Pediatric Innovation Research & Education (INSPIRE). https://www.inspiresim.com. Accessed 23Feb 2021. Hollnagel E. FRAMILY. 2020. https://functionalresonance.com/framily-meetings/framily%202018-2/framily%202018%20tutorial%20resources.html. Accessed 18 May 2020. Rees C. FRAM Model Visualiser. 2020. http://zerprize.co.nz/FRAM/index.html. Accessed 18 May 2020. Patriarca R, Di Gravio G, Woltjer R, Costantino F, Praetorius G, Ferreira P, et al. Framing the FRAM: A literature review on the functional resonance analysis method. Saf. Sci. 2020;129:104827. Auerbach M, Cole J, Violano P, Roney L, Doherty C, Shepherd M, et al. An International Interprofessional Study of Mental Models and Factors Delaying Neuroimaging of Critically Head-Injured Children Presenting to Emergency Departments. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018;34:797–801. Macrae C. Moments of Resilience: Time, Space and the Organisation of Safety in Complex Sociotechnical Systems. In: Wiig S, Fahlbruch B, editors. Exploring Resilience: A Scientific Journey from Practice to Theory. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 15–23. Salzano KA, Maurer CA, Wyvratt JM, Stewart T, Peck J, Rygiel B, et al. A Knowledge Management Framework and Approach for Clinical Development. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016;50:536–45. Cox M, Irby DM, Reznick RK, MacRae H. Teaching Surgical Skills — Changes in the Wind. New Engl J Med. 2006;355:2664–9.