A new model for managing change: the holistic view

Journal of Business Strategy - Tập 29 Số 1 - Trang 40-45 - 2008
AndyAdcroft1, RobertWillis2, JeffHurst3
1Teaches strategy in the School of Management at the University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
2Reader at the Ashcroft International Business School at Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK.
3Director of Alternative Minds, Burgh Heath, UK.

Tóm tắt

PurposeIn an age where organizational transformation is becoming more important to both the theory and practice of strategic management, the aim of this paper is to provide a model through which organizational transformation and strategic change can be understood in an holistic manner.Design/methodology/approachIn developing a model to explain organizational transformation, the paper draws on two different theoretical traditions. First, the paper draws on theories of political revolutions and, second, the paper draws on interpretative theories, in particular, speech act theory.FindingsThe paper argues that in order to provide a realistic understanding of how and why an organization has attempted a transformational strategy it is important to consider four issues: the event which triggered the transformation, the program and process through which transformation was attempted, the outcome of the transformational strategy, and the myths which have been built up around the transformation.Originality/valueThe paper takes a novel approach by drawing on non‐management theories to develop an understanding of management phenomena. In doing this the paper generates an original model useful for the post rational explanation of transformational strategies.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Calvert, P. (1970), A Study of Revolution, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Chaharbaghi, K. and Willis, R. (1998), “Strategy: the missing link between continuous revolution and constant evolution”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 18 Nos 9/10, pp. 1017‐27.

Sillince, A.A. (1999), “The role of political language forms and language coherence in the organizational change process”, Organisational Studies, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 485‐518.