A multiple regression model for patent appraisal

Industrial Management and Data Systems - Tập 106 Số 9 - Trang 1304-1332 - 2006
Jiang‐Liang Hou1, Hsiu‐Yan Lin
1Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan, Republic of China

Tóm tắt

PurposeConcerning the general patent trading mechanism, this paper proposes a systematic patent appraisal model to provide patent transferors and transferees a reasonable price suggestion of the target patent.Design/methodology/approachBased on the appraisal factors (including the patent transferor, patent transferee, patent features, and patent trading specifications) and regression model, a patent trading system is developed with an automatic patent appraisal function.FindingsBased on the case study, it is found that the system performance is better if the non‐critical factors can be identified and dropped out from the appraisal model.Practical implicationsThe proposed model and platform can enhance patent trading performance and, therefore, the enterprise R&D tasks can be accomplished more efficiently.Originality/valueThis study proposes quantitative models of patent appraisal factors and a multiple regression model for patent appraisal to present an automatic patent price determination mechanism.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bose, R. (2004), “Knowledge management metrics”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 104 No. 6, pp. 457‐68.

Chang, M‐Y. (2002), “A study on the affecting factors and valuation models in intangible assets”, doctoral dissertation, Department of Information Management, National Chengchi University, Taipei.

Chen, Y‐C. (2002), “Development of knowledge industry: appraisal of intangible assets and industrial policies”, Technology Development Policy Report, Taipei City Science and Technology Information Center, Taipei.

Cheng, B‐Y. (2003), “A study on the legalization of intellectual property valuation”, doctoral dissertation, Graduate Institute of Law, National Taipei University, Taipei.

Choy, C.S., Yew, W.K. and Lin, B. (2006), “Criteria for measuring KM performance outcomes in organizations”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 106 No. 7, pp. 917‐36.

Danchev, A. (2006), “Social capital and sustainable behavior of the firm”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 106 No. 7, pp. 953‐65.

Davidson, W.H. and McFetridge, D.G. (1985), “Key characteristics in the choice of international technology transfer mode”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 5‐21.

Gelle, E. and Karhu, K. (2003), “Information quality for strategic technology planning”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 103 No. 8, pp. 633‐43.

Goh, A.L.S. (2006), “Evolution of industrial policy‐making in support of innovation: the vase of Singapore”, International Journal of innovation and Learning, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 110‐25.

González‐Alvarez, N. and Nieto‐Antolín, M. (2005), “Protection and internal transfer of technological competencies: the role of causal ambiguity”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 105 No. 7, pp. 841‐56.

Hou, J‐L. and Huang, C‐H. (2006), “Quantitative performance evaluation of RFID applications in the supply chain of the printing industry”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 106 No. 1, pp. 96‐120.

Hsu, C‐Y. (2003), “A study on the operational mechanism of technical trading platform”, master thesis, Graduate Institute of Information Management, Chung Yuan Christian University, Jhongli.

Huang, E.Y. and Lin, S‐C. (2006), “How R&D management practice affects innovation performance: an investigation of the high‐tech industry in Taiwan”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 106 No. 7, pp. 966‐96.

Hunt, F.H., Probert, D.R., Wong, J.C. and Phaal, R. (2003), “Valuation of technology: exploring a practical hybrid model”, paper presented at the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, pp. 47‐53.

Lemos, A.D. and Porto, A.C. (1998), “Technological forecasting techniques and competitive intelligence: tools for improving the innovation process”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 98 No. 7, pp. 330‐7.

Li, S‐D. (1999), “Evaluation of patent values”, Legal Problems in Evaluation of Intellectual Property Values, p. 32.

Li, Y‐L. (2004), “A study on the technical capacity and development path of biochip companies: using USPTO database”, master thesis, Graduate Institute of Business Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin.

Liu, J‐B., Liu, W‐C., Sun, Y‐C., Chang, M‐Y., Lai, G‐Y. and Ruan, T‐S. (2001), “A study on the technology and patent valuation model for technical trading specifications”, ITRI Project Report.

Lu, J‐L. (2002), “A study on the application technology and patent valuation of options pricing model”, master thesis, Graduate Institute of Business Management, Shih Chien University, Taipei.

Malewicki, D. and Sivakumar, K. (2004), “Patents and product development strategies: a model of antecedents and consequences of patent value”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 5‐22.

Raymond, L. and Croteau, A‐M. (2006), “Enabling the strategic development of SMEs through advanced manufacturing systems: a configurational perspective”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 106 No. 7, pp. 1012‐32.

Razgaitis, R. (1999), Early‐Stage Technologies: Valuation and Pricing, Wiley, New York, NY.

Samli, A.C. (1985), “Technology transfer: the general model”, Technology Transfer: Geographic, Economic, Cultural, and Technical Dimensions, Quorum Books, Westport, CT, pp. 8‐14.

Teece, D.J. (1977), “Technology transfer by the multinational firms: the resource cost of transferring technological know‐how”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 87 No. 2, pp. 242‐61.

Welch, N.O. (1990), “Foundation for technology valuation: a survey of practice, a conceptual framework, and a valuation tool”, PhD thesis, The George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Industrial Management and Data Systems

Tập 106 Số 9

1304-1332

Thông tin tác giả